by meemoe_uk » Sun 03 Jun 2012, 04:46:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', 'J')apan like Europe and the U.S. got rid of a lot of manufacturing offshore
it's great for the mother companies , they keep the Research and development ,
the financial structure ,the merchandizing ....Etc
all the energy intensive , socially troublesome manufacturing process is send far away
energy costs are now hidden in the containers unloaded at the docks
By that logic Japan should have hit an energy consumption high around 1995 when its manufacturing was still 94% domestic, but it didn't. Now it's down to 80% while its energy consumption has plateaued.



It's curious that Japan's average energy use per capita is actually about the same for western European countries. Both Europe and Japan get by with about half the energy per capita of the USA.
So the question becomes : So why was JD so interested in expounding Japan as some sort of unique example of an energy efficiency economy when several countries in Europe are seemingly just as energy efficient?
The answer negates one of your assumptions. Unlike the USA and most of Western Europe, Japan retains most of its domestic manufacturing, and its the manufacturing industry that consumes most of the energy. The Japanese citizens get relatively little of their country's annual energy. In the US and western Europe its other other way round. The citizens get the energy, while manufacturing doesn't need it because it's mostly offshore.
Japan retains about 80% of its domestic maufacturing. For the USA it's down to around 30%.
Countries don't tend to decomission power plants as soon as a manufacturing plant goes offshore. Instead the citizen's get the energy. It's only now in the West, 15 years after the bulk of manufacturing has been offshored to china and india that efforts are made by the powers that be to shut down energy production - cue the creation of the AGW religion.