by emersonbiggins » Wed 15 Mar 2006, 11:14:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'W')hy do people say that - defining it in how many days consumption it provides? It is nonsense. A field that size would produce for decades at impressive flow rates, so i've no idea why comparing it to how many days consumption it would provide. Its a bad idea and totally misleading - you dont seriously think you can pump 10 billion barrels of oil out in 119 days do you?
The equivocation swings both ways, esp. when you consider ex-Secretary/Interior Gale Norton said that ANWR would provide New Hampshire with all the oil it needs for
315 years (assuming that it would be the only recipient of that oil, of course).
Just for clarification, this field in Mexico could provide 1% of
current world consumption for 32.6 years (119 days @ 100% world consumption; 11900 days @ 1% world consumption), a figure that largely dismisses the facts that depletion follows a bell curve and that consumption trends upward over time.