by Outcast_Searcher » Tue 04 Jan 2011, 14:54:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'W')hat do YOU support?
I'd like to see a coherent and intelligent energy policy from the Obama administration instead of the incoherent, inconsistent and incompetent mess they have produced.
The record of the odd sequence of inconsistent and self-contradictory decisions made by Obama is clear (even if Obama's energy policies aren't).
Well, I agree. And economically, I tend to lean right, certainly far more than left. However, on this type of issue the far right goes too far.
I find the position of the far right (which this FOX piece has been consistently spouting, at least in the VAST majority of any editorial comment from the right wing speakers I have seen on FOX News for several years now), while at least consistent, completely unrealistic and destructive in the long term.
The far right, IMO, OFTEN uses science denial to push their agendas. The main agendas are:
1). Push for the exploitation of all economic resources, and the hell with the consequences now, and especially later (to the planet or to future generations). This makes obvious sense (now) for the super-rich, but how about everyone else?
2). Push for "Christian" based values, such as family values. Things like the ludicrous position of denying evolution, despite ALL the evidence, are clear indicators of this. I'm all for morality, but using lies to try to legitimize one's position (and force one's personal lifestyle choices on everyone else) will lead to bad policy.
A coherent and long term American energy policy, which takes into consideration obvious realities like finite resources AND a generally growing need for for energy for the forseeable future (and the implied trade-offs such a policy would entail) is what we need. We haven't gotten that from EITHER party (much like almost every other serious long term issue the U.S. faces).
Drill baby drill. Yes, we need that in the short term for both economic and security reasons. However, unless you're a corny AND a complete denier of all climate and finite resource issues -- that is NOT a valid intermediate to long term strategy. (Things like carbon sequestration, investment in promising green tech, etc. need to be seriously considered and utilized based on scientific EVIDENCE and economic trends. Science denial precludes the GOP from seriously considering such issues).
Yeah, Obama's energy policies are a mess. So are the GOP's - just a more consistent mess of a different flavor.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.