by steam_cannon » Tue 11 Sep 2007, 12:01:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'S')team Cannon, You blew off my response. It's well documented that remote viewing occurs during NDE's. If this can be verified independently, it's almost a case closed. It can be concluded that, at the very least, you don't have to maintain a physical connection with your body to maintain consciousness.
So far I directed you to a video dealing specifically with the type of fraudulent studies you are quoting. Honestly think about it, do you really think I'm blowing you off? I want santa clause to be real just as much as the next guy, but the studies mentioned so far are not compelling.
Many studies are published, especially to the web. However what good are they when they don't make it though peer review or are fraudulent?
And historically studies "proving" psychic powers have always later shown to be fraudulent, irreproducible or the result of statistical error. This is an area with a lot of fraud, much like gas vaporisation systems for cars. If you don't know about the fraud that has gone on with studies on psychic powers, perhaps you should start there.
Many intelligent people fall for gas vaporisation scams because they don't check if the studies they are reading are real and not tainted with fraud or other errors. Similarly if you crack open a book on New Age Out of Body experiences, when they list studies that are known to be fraudulent, don't expect them to be removed in the next edition. Like religious texts, errant information accumulates and is rarely edited out. If a study is tainted with fraud or didn't pass peer review, they will still list it. It sells. Books on the Bermuda triangle work this way too. I was reading an amusing book on the dragons triangle a while back, full to the brim with fake statistics and errors, great stories though...
Speaking of statistics, it's like with gas vaporisation fuel scams, most people don't check the studies they read...
I mean you can believe your sources if you want, but the peer reviewed studies and top phd's in neuroscience absolutely disagree with your conclusion.
Here are a few questions. You mentioned some studies, are you mentally strong enough to question those studies and spend a few hours researching them? Looking up if the Phd's in it exist, calling a few to see if they were really involved in the study? Looking up what their peers say about the study? Looking up or even just watching a video on counter studies? Talking to a few phd's in neuroscience? Because that is what I do, I take this question very seriously.
And the deeper question is, if it turns out that your proof of immortality isn't real, can you mentally handle that? Understandably, the answer to that for most people is no. People rarely question religious beliefs about immortality, nobody wants to die. So I guess the first question has to be, is that something you're able to do?
Can you live with the idea of real permanent death hanging over you?
I respect you threadbear, but I disagree with your conclusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
William Shakespeare - To be, or not to be (from Hamlet 3/1)
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action. - Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.