by Tanada » Tue 10 May 2005, 18:18:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')here's no need to suffer from health or lifespan loss due to a "simpler" way of life. There's no need to lose knowledge of basic sanitation, which has been the main preventer of disease in modern times. Nor a need to lose knowledge of sterile surgical techniques. Why people insist on equating a different way of life with suffering, I don't understand.
Have you seen pictures from Ethiopia, Tibet or Nicaragua? World wide knowledge of sepsis and antiseptic treatments does not keep those people healthy and promote long life, why do you think it would be any different for you in a post modern world?
Knowledge is a great first step, but all the knowledge in the world won't help if you do not have the ability to implement it. After you spend an exhausting 12 hours a day hoeing corn and pulling up tares in the wheat will you have energy to dig the new outhouse pit deep and down hill from your water supply? Without bleach the only way to keep your water supply bacteria free is extensive boiling, best done in a pressure cooker. Where do you get your heat source of the supply is strictly local? And so on and so forth, saying we can all live a simple healthy life is not at all the same as doing it, and the older you get the harder it will be for you to dig a new latrine and haul in enough firewood to sterilize your drinking and washing water.