Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: How nerd addicted to planes uncovered CIA's "tortur

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 12:57:57

Not surprised yet "wow" is all I can get out ;-)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: How nerd addicted to planes uncovered CIA's "tortur

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 22:26:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')EOPO you are one of the few on this site to be horrified and outraged by this behavior.


I'm just plain annoyed.

There's a term for such things. It's called treason. A violation of our constitution is just that.


The CIA should be dismantled.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Angry_Chimp » Mon 22 Oct 2007, 17:24:12

If you follow up on Ali Mohamed you'll see why his role was very much covered up in the 9/11 commission report.

From Peter Dale Scott:

“The Commission also steps carefully around the embarrassing case of Ali Mohamed, an important al Qaeda agent who (as the Commission was told) "trained most of al Qaeda's top leadership," including "persons who would later carry out the 1993 World Trade Center bombing." [27] There are indications that the 9/11 Report minimized Mohamed's background because Mohamed was almost certainly an out-of-control informant for the FBI. [28]”
It has been widely reported, and never denied, that after Mohamed first came to the United States from Egypt in the early 1980s he was in contact with the CIA and worked with U.S. Army Special Forces. [34] Mohamed trained the 1993 WTC bombers at an Islamist center in Brooklyn, New York, where earlier he had been recruiting and training Arabs for the U.S.-supported Afghan War. The London Independent has reported that he was on the U.S. payroll at the time he was training the Arab Afghans, and that the CIA, reviewing the case five years after the first WTC bombing, concluded in an internal document that the CIA itself was "partly culpable" in the World Trade Center attack. [35] But the 9/11 Report is utterly silent about Mohamed's links to the CIA and FBI.

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Fi ... 1sep04.htm



Robert Friedman [New Yorker Magazine 3/17/95]

The CIA’s Jihad, by Robert I Friedman - March 1995

<<SNIP>>

In a tiny, cramped storefront at 552 Atlantic Avenue in Boerum Hill, right next to the New York Beauty School and across the street from a Domino’s Pizza, first-generation Arab immigrants sit for hours over cups of strong, dark coffee, fondling their worry beads and engaging in kalam, or ‘idle talk.’

‘They talked against Zionism, blaming American foreign policy,’ says M.T. Mehdi, president of the American-Arab relations Committee. ‘The usual stuff of people who have nothing else to do.’

The Alkifah Refugee Centre, in addition to providing a hangout for the disaffected, distributed pamphlets and videotapes on the rebel war in Afghanistan. On any given day, a visitor to the centre might take martial-arts classes, or sign up for an automatic-weapons training course taught by instructors from the National Rifle Association. The club even had its own T-shirts: A MUSLIM TO A MUSLIM IS A BRICK WALL. But the highlight for the centre’s regulars were the inspirational jihad lecture series, featuring CIA-sponsored speakers.

One week on Atlantic Avenue, it might be a CIA-trained Afghan rebel travelling on a CIA-issued visa; the next, it might be a clean-cut Arabic-speaking Green Beret, who would lecture about the importance of being part of the mujaheddin, or ‘warriors of the Lord.’ The more popular lectures were held upstairs in the roomier Al-Farooq Mosque; such was the case in 1990 when Sheikh Abdel Rahman, travelling on a CIA-supported visa, came to town. The blind Egyptian cleric, with his ferocious rhetoric and impassioned preaching, filled angry, discontented Arab immigrants with a fervour for jihad – holy war. This was exactly what the CIA wanted: to stir up support for the Muslim rebels and topple the Soviet-backed government in Afghanistan.

The sheikh, however, had a somewhat broader agenda.

A former investigative counsel for the Senate Foreign Relatiosn Committee, now a private attorney in Washington, Jack Blum speaks bitterly but fatalistically. ‘After every covert war there is an unintended disposal problem,’ he says, as if he were talking about unexpected land mines and not potential Islamic terrorists living in Brooklyn. ‘We steered and encouraged these people. Then we dropped them. Now we’ve got a disposal problem. When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?’

The answer for the CIA was, you don’t. And then when the fanatical fervour you’ve whipped up leads to unintended consequences – the assassination of a Jewish militant leader in Manhattan, the bombing of the World Trade Centre, a terror conspiracy to blow up the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels and other Manhattan landmarks – you try to discourage local law enforcement agencies and the FBI from looking into the matter too deeply.

Negative fallout from CIA operations is nothing new; there’s even spook jargon for it: blowback. But the CIA’s secret support and training of Afghan rebels during the past decade has created a blowback of monumental proportions and lasting impact. The CIA has inadvertently managed to do something that America’s enemies have been unable to: give terrorism a foothold in the United States.

http://www.currentviewpoint.com/cgibin/ ... newsid=294
Last edited by Ferretlover on Sat 14 Mar 2009, 23:39:51, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE CIA Thread.
User avatar
Angry_Chimp
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 22 Oct 2007, 20:18:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', ' ')When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?


Moslems have been going on jihad ever since Muhammad conquered Mecca. The Mujahadeen went on jihad against the USSR in Afghanistan long before the U.S. aided them. The US supplied funding and Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, but its silly to claim the US was also the source of their motivation. The motivation of the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets came from Islam. :twisted:
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Angry_Chimp » Mon 22 Oct 2007, 21:59:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', ' ')When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?


Moslems have been going on jihad ever since Muhammad conquered Mecca. The Mujahadeen went on jihad against the USSR in Afghanistan long before the U.S. aided them. The US supplied funding and Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, but its silly to claim the US was also the source of their motivation. The motivation of the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets came from Islam. :twisted:


If that’s all you took away from those two articles you are not too perceptive.

==AC
“A utilitarian civilization will always go on to its logical conclusion – forced labor camps.”
~Romain Gary
User avatar
Angry_Chimp
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 22 Oct 2007, 22:21:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', ' ')When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?


Moslems have been going on jihad ever since Muhammad conquered Mecca. The Mujahadeen went on jihad against the USSR in Afghanistan long before the U.S. aided them. The US supplied funding and Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, but its silly to claim the US was also the source of their motivation. The motivation of the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets came from Islam. :twisted:


If that’s all you took away from those two articles you are not too perceptive.



Your premise is that the US motivated the Mujahadeen to the fight in Afghanistan, and now they have turned on us.

But your premise is wrong.

The US never controlled the Mujahadeen and the Mujahadeen never drew their motivation to fight against the USSR invasion of Afghanistan from the US. They were motivated entirely by their religous beliefs.

Your lack of understanding of those historical events and of the importance of Islam to the Mujahadeen shows you are not very perceptive about history or knowledgeable about different cultures. :P
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby AlCzervik » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 00:10:57

Yup, AC. The FBI was actively working with Emad Salem in 1993 and essentially ran the whole thing. Salem had the audiotapes to prove it.

And as anyone with knowledge of things like Peter Dale Scott deep politics understands, CIA>>>Pakistani ISI>>>Taliban.
AlCzervik
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Motor City

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby AlCzervik » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 00:14:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', ' ')When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?


Moslems have been going on jihad ever since Muhammad conquered Mecca. The Mujahadeen went on jihad against the USSR in Afghanistan long before the U.S. aided them. The US supplied funding and Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, but its silly to claim the US was also the source of their motivation. The motivation of the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets came from Islam. :twisted:


If that’s all you took away from those two articles you are not too perceptive.



Your premise is that the US motivated the Mujahadeen to the fight in Afghanistan, and now they have turned on us.

But your premise is wrong.

The US never controlled the Mujahadeen and the Mujahadeen never drew their motivation to fight against the USSR invasion of Afghanistan from the US. They were motivated entirely by their religous beliefs.

Your lack of understanding of those historical events and of the importance of Islam to the Mujahadeen shows you are not very perceptive about history or knowledgeable about different cultures. :P


You might want to talk to Zbiggie.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
http://www.answers.com/topic/zbigniew-brzezinski
AlCzervik
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Motor City
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 00:38:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Angry_Chimp', ' ')When you motivate people to fight for a cause – jihad – the problem is, how do you shut them off?


Moslems have been going on jihad ever since Muhammad conquered Mecca. The Mujahadeen went on jihad against the USSR in Afghanistan long before the U.S. aided them. The US supplied funding and Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, but its silly to claim the US was also the source of their motivation. The motivation of the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets came from Islam. :twisted:


No, that's not right.

Zbigniew Brzezinski copped to the whole plot long ago. It was his idea to "draw the Soviets into the Afghan trap". Back in the Carter days, he had gone round and round with Cyrus Vance about detente with the Soviets. Vance wanted a more peaceful co-existence with the Soviets and Zbig wanted to see their total and complete defeat. Zbig's belligerent policies won out and his plans to sucker the Soviets into a war of attrition were implemented using Islamist fighters.

The only thing that was already in place was the ring of Islam surrounding the Soviet Union's soft underbelly. It was just a matter of whipping up Islamic hatred for the godless USSR. There was never any love lost between the Soviets and their Islamic population anyway.

But even the Soviet-Afghanistan episode had a precursor when Islamic hatred of the secular Nasser regime in Egypt was whipped up to help ouster the Soviets from that country.

The Muslim Brotherhood began in Egypt largely as a result of that country's leadership kowtowing to the British, whose policies had run counter to Islamic religious doctrines.

It's a very old story - Western powers meddling in the Middle East and manipulating the situation du jour with money, arms, propaganda...whatever.

The history of it is complicated as all hell too.

Image

A History Of The Modern Middle East

Best comprehensive history on the ME I ever read. And it's a standard blue chip text very often used in university courses. Pick it up at your library, Plant.

I'm reading "The Road To 911" by Peter Dale Scott right now. He is densely detailed and I can't pin any lies or exagerations on him either.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 01:10:00

Zbigniew Bzezinski??

Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski did very little to counter the the 1979 USSR invasion of Afghanistan. Bzesinki and Carter's only overt response to the Soviet invasion was to stop the U.S. Olympic team from competing in the 1980 Moscow Olympics. Carter and Brzesinski were too afraid to directly aid the Mujahadeen and refused to send modern US weapons to the Mujahadeen, for fear of antagonizing the Soviets.

It was Reagan who sent U.S. stinger missiles to the Mujahadeen, allowing them to shoot down the Soviet Helicopter gunships and seize control of the countryside and boot the soviets out of Afghanistan.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 02:09:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'Z')bigniew Bzezinski??

Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski did very little to counter the the 1979 USSR invasion of Afghanistan. Bzesinki and Carter's only overt response to the Soviet invasion was to stop the U.S. Olympic team from competing in the 1980 Moscow Olympics. Carter and Brzesinski were too afraid to directly aid the Mujahadeen and refused to send modern US weapons to the Mujahadeen, for fear of antagonizing the Soviets.

It was Reagan who sent U.S. stinger missiles to the Mujahadeen, allowing them to shoot down the Soviet Helicopter gunships and seize control of the countryside and boot the soviets out of Afghanistan.


Well, the history is there, dude. You'll just have to go read about it yourself.

Brzezinski's self-confessed plan was to stir up trouble with the Soviet-installed government in Kabul. And this trouble-making had been going on for quite a while with the Soviets very reluctant to enter into Afghanistan to restore order. This all happened during the Carter years. The war grew hot during the Reagan years.

The idea was to get the Soviets into a war on their southern flank and use the Islamic population from all over the ME as fighters, the US supplying arms. It was intended to bleed the Soviets to death. Brzezinski wanted to hand them their "Vietnam". He has said this and defended it and is proud of it.

The whole story is complicated by Saudi involvment as well. Saudi money financing Wahhabism and the CIA jumping on board that wagon as a way to inflame the ring of Islam around the Soviet Union.

Carter's condemnation of the Soviet Union for invading and his canceling of the Olympics, etc. were all for public consumption and the turning of world opinion against the Soviets.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Angry_Chimp » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 07:34:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Your premise is that the US motivated the Mujahadeen to the fight in Afghanistan, and now they have turned on us.

But your premise is wrong.

The US never controlled the Mujahadeen and the Mujahadeen never drew their motivation to fight against the USSR invasion of Afghanistan from the US. They were motivated entirely by their religous beliefs.

Your lack of understanding of those historical events and of the importance of Islam to the Mujahadeen shows you are not very perceptive about history or knowledgeable about different cultures. :P


That is not my premise. Without the United States the Mujahadeen and the Taliban are nothing more than a bunch of chumps running around in the desert. The CIA gave them visas brought them into the US set up recruitment stations on this soil and trained them in gorilla warfare and armed them with sophisticated weapons.

It is my premise that the CIA has been running agents and creating an enemy that they knew they were going to need after the fall of the Soviet Union. It is my premise that the individuals that were involved in the 9/11 plot were agents being run by the CIA and they were duped and setup in that operation. They were involved in some sort of operation on that day and knew nothing about what was going to happen. These guys were set up just like the dupes that committed the 1993 bombings. The FBI knew what they were going to do and made sure it got done.
“A utilitarian civilization will always go on to its logical conclusion – forced labor camps.”
~Romain Gary
User avatar
Angry_Chimp
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 12:22:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', ' ')The idea was to get the Soviets into a war on their southern flank and use the Islamic population from all over the ME as fighters, the US supplying arms. It was intended to bleed the Soviets to death. Brzezinski wanted to hand them their "Vietnam". He has said this and defended it and is proud of it..


The USSR did indeed have a VietNam-style defeat in Afghanistan, but it didn't occur while Bzezinski and Jimmy Carter were in office. Carter made weak ineffectual protests after the Soviet invasion, like stopping the US Olympic team from competing. Yes, the US participated in aiding the Mujahadeen along with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, China, etc. but US aid was small because Carter was afraid to send aid that could be traced back to the U.S. For that reason Carter refused to authorize Stingers. It was only after Carter and Brzezinski left office and Reagan took over that the US initiated the "Reagan doctrine" and the US greatly expanded its aid effort and provided enough money, weapons and a large numbers of advanced Stinger missiles that allowed the Mujahadeen to destroy the Russian air superiority and led to the military victory by the Mujahadeen. To his credit, Brzezinski was an early advocate of confronting the Russians in Afghanistan, and I'm sure Brezinski supported the expansion of the effort it occurred under Reagan, and I'm sure he supported the Reagan doctrine and cheered when the USSR was defeated. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 15:58:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', ' ')The idea was to get the Soviets into a war on their southern flank and use the Islamic population from all over the ME as fighters, the US supplying arms. It was intended to bleed the Soviets to death. Brzezinski wanted to hand them their "Vietnam". He has said this and defended it and is proud of it..


The USSR did indeed have a VietNam-style defeat in Afghanistan, but it didn't occur while Bzezinski and Jimmy Carter were in office. Carter made weak ineffectual protests after the Soviet invasion, like stopping the US Olympic team from competing. Yes, the US participated in aiding the Mujahadeen along with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, China, etc. but US aid was small because Carter was afraid to send aid that could be traced back to the U.S. For that reason Carter refused to authorize Stingers. It was only after Carter and Brzezinski left office and Reagan took over that the US initiated the "Reagan doctrine" and the US greatly expanded its aid effort and provided enough money, weapons and a large numbers of advanced Stinger missiles that allowed the Mujahadeen to destroy the Russian air superiority and led to the military victory by the Mujahadeen. To his credit, Brzezinski was an early advocate of confronting the Russians in Afghanistan, and I'm sure Brezinski supported the expansion of the effort it occurred under Reagan, and I'm sure he supported the Reagan doctrine and cheered when the USSR was defeated. 8)


You should go argue it with Zbigniew Brzezinski.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Le Nouvel Observateur', 'A')ccording to this 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the CIA's intervention in Afghanistan preceded the 1979 Soviet invasion. This decision of the Carter Administration in 1979 to intervene and destabilise Afghanistan is the root cause of Afghanistan's destruction as a nation.

Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?

B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.

B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.

Translated from the French by Bill Blum


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The URL of this article is:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

Copyright, Le Nouvel Observateur and Bill Blum. For fair use only.



That interview segment has been published far and wide and it is referenced everywhere.

In everything you've ever posted here on PO.com, Plant, you have shown a blind acceptance of any official version of history or current events. But the fact of the matter is, human beings act like human beings the world over and their machinations and ingenuity for intrigue, beguilment and deception are hallmarks of leadership going back thousands of years in any country or region you care to investigate. Nothing is different about our present time.

This sort Truth, Justice & The American Way version of events you subscribe to is a figment! Pure crap. Or, strike that, NOT pure crap, crap mixed with truth, which makes it even more challenging to discern.

Not that there's anything particularly wrong with America or Americans, it's just that this country has been the richest and most powerful for such a long time, that political intrigues here are of so much more consequence than elsewhere.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:33:34

Thanks, Carlhole, for your post of the Brzezinski interview. Brzezinksi is a veteran of the "cold war" and sees things through that prism. So do you. But the world was more complex in 1979 then just the USSR versus the USA. You are forgetting there was a third party to the war in Afghanistan.....the Afghani resistance fighters and the foreign Islamic mujahadeen.

Its too simplistic to see the war in Afghanistan as only part of the "cold war" between the US and USSR...it was also a jihad by Islamic Mujahadeen fighters against a secular government in Kabul.

The Soviets didn't send their own troops into Afghanistan because the US was covertly aiding the Mujahadeen against their puppets in Kabul. US aid was very minimal and was having no effect on the war in 1979...your own post shows that aid had been going on for only six months. The US aid was just the cover story the Communists put out to justify their invasion, knowing well that reflexive anti-Americans would parrot their claim then, just as they are still doing now, and accept it as a justification for the soviet invasion.

In actuality the Soviets invaded BECAUSE THEIR PUPPETS IN KABUL WERE LOSING to the Islamic Mujahadeen. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 18:45:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', ' ')In actuality the Soviets invaded BECAUSE THEIR PUPPETS IN KABUL WERE LOSING to the Islamic Mujahadeen. 8)


The disorder in Kabul would have been a manageable thing for the Soviets to restore normally. Aghanistan has always been factionalized and war-prone due to the wildness and diversity of the constantly warring Afghan tribes.

The Hawks in the US sought to exploit the disorder in Kabul by exacerbating it. So instead of the Soviets having to simply send a small contingent of troops and a few advisors to resore the strength of the government (as would be normal), the soviets had to invade in force. And that was the goal.

I trust Zbigniew Brzezinski's interpretation of events over yours, Plant. He was the National Security Advisor to Carter. He was there and it was his plan.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wiki', 'O')n January 18, 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the Soviet invasion and was indeed designed to prompt a Soviet invasion, leading them into a bloody conflict on a par with America's experience in Vietnam. This was referred to as the "Afghan Trap." Brzezinski viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.

In his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski says that assistance to the Afghan resistance was a tactic designed to bog down the Soviet army while the United States built up a deterrent military force in the Persian Gulf to prevent Soviet political or military penetration farther south (see: the Carter Doctrine).

In a footnote in his 2000 book The Geostrategic Triad, Brzezinski notes:

The full story of the productive U.S.-China cooperation directed against the Soviet Union (especially in regard to Afghanistan), initiated by the Carter Administration and continued under Reagan, still remains to be told.

A memo from Zbigniew Brzezinski to President Carter on December 26, 1979, discusses the implications of a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan on U.S. foreign policy, especially regarding Iran.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: The CIA’s Jihad

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 19:27:31

I trust Brzezinki's statements over yours, Carlhole.

June 13, 1997, in a CNN/National Security Archive interview, Brzezinski detailed the strategy taken by the Carter administration against the Soviets:

"We immediately launched a twofold process when we heard that the Soviets had entered Afghanistan. The first involved direct reactions and sanctions focused on the Soviet Union, and both the State Department and the National Security Council prepared long lists of sanctions to be adopted, of steps to be taken to increase the international costs to the Soviet Union of their actions. And the second course of action led to my going to Pakistan a month or so after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, for the purpose of coordinating with the Pakistanis a joint response, the purpose of which would be to make the Soviets bleed for as much and as long as is possible; and we engaged in that effort in a collaborative sense with the Saudis, the Egyptians, the British, the Chinese, and we started providing weapons to the Mujaheddin, from various sources again—for example, some Soviet arms from the Egyptians and the Chinese. We even got Soviet arms from the Czechoslovak communist government, since it was obviously susceptible to material incentives; and at some point we started buying arms for the Mujaheddin from the Soviet army in Afghanistan, because that army was increasingly corrupt. "

Brzesinski wanted to "bleed" the Soviets after they invaded Afghanistan, and arranged to have the Pakistanis supply the insurgents with soviet armaments. It wasn't until Reagan took office that the "Reagan doctrine" made it US policy to defeat the Soviets and drive them out of Afghanistan and elsewhere in a move to roll back and destroy the Soviet Empire. Under Reagan the US directly aided the Mujahadeen and supplied them with U.S. weapons including Stingers that smashed the Russian Helicopter gunships and disrupted their tactics. This allowed the Mujahadeen to defeat the Soviets. The defeats crippled the Soviets. In a few more years the Russians were pushed out of eastern Europe. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests