Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Cantarell Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby lonewolf » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 18:34:30

So, just how is the Mexican 'government' going to withhold product from their citizenry? Create intentional shortages? Drive up the price? Raise taxes significantly? All of the above? Just how long could that tactic possibly last? Mexicans for the most part are fully aware of the extent of their domestic oil production. If they perceive that their access to their own oil is being even minimally constrained/manipulated in ANY way, well ... all bets are off wrt the national government effecting/retaining any degree of 'control' during the collapse. IMO.
User avatar
lonewolf
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun 06 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: past tense

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby eastbay » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 20:58:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
')
By the way lonewulf, I do appreciate your efforts at warning. Ive been saying for quite some time now to folks who might listen that Mexico is an important case to watch.



Yup. Me too. Mexico's pending collapse is The Big Issue facing the USA from... just about now on. A happy ending is impossible. And that's the optimistic prognostication. The pessimistic one is unthinkable.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby lonewolf » Mon 04 Jan 2010, 21:32:39

Over the short term, the degree/extent of effects in the US of Mexico in petro-collapse will largely depend on the rate at which they reduce exports.
If they started now and cut 10% per month, that could ease the US transition of other sources. But I doubt that they do this since they are utterly dependent upon that income (invested in graft). So, more true to form, they'll likely procrastinate with lies until they have no choice (aka NO oil) and are forced to dramatically slash deliveries on a shortened time frame.

I'm wondering how/when the oil speculators/traders/market will react, regardless of actual delivery or public pronouncements from Mexico - or not.

Over the long term, this 'transition point' - and much more to come - was wholly anticipated and utterly inevitable. No matter what happens when with Cantarell/to Mexico, one thing is certain. FAR worse is yet to come.
User avatar
lonewolf
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun 06 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: past tense

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby OutOfGas » Tue 05 Jan 2010, 07:43:42

I would not advise anyone to relocate to a state next to the Mexican border. When TSHTF additional millions of Mexicans will be heading north. There will be no way to stop them. Look for massive FEMA camps in the border states.
OutOfGas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat 21 Mar 2009, 19:31:45

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby AirlinePilot » Wed 06 Jan 2010, 20:07:54

lonewulf,

Your being naive if you dont think that TPTB can with hold certain amounts of production and use that for export. How is the common man even going to know? How does he find out?

Shortages can have Many reasons, Im sure the Mexican Govt can be pretty creative.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby TheDude » Wed 06 Jan 2010, 23:21:06

Avg 2009 Cantarell production: 638.74 kb/d, a decline of 406.76 kb/d from 2008.

Avg 2009 production for Mexico: 2951.08 kb/d, a decline of 234.56 kb/d from 2008. This is due in large part to boosted production from KMZ, which will in all likelihood crash the same way eventually.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby lonewolf » Thu 07 Jan 2010, 12:29:14

Not that I (or anyone should) necessarily believe that particular number set but the values reported in your link provide an interesting contrast. First, if true, Mexico currently produces far more than enough crude to meet domestic demand (assuming reimport of refined product). Actually, according to those values, Cantarell could (and will soon be) at zero output and their export capacity would barely (minimally) be effected. Is that actually believable? The third largest field on the planet can and will go completely dry and this has no significant effect on the export capacity! Yeah Right!

Also of interest is the stated "Proven Reserves" of 11.650 billion barrels. [Not 11 comma 650 B]
Which, by simple division, at the current pro-suction rate of 2,791,500 bpd gives 11.4 years to achieve precisely F-all.
Or 5.7 years to burn through 1/2 of all their remaining oil (at steady output rates, which isn't possible IMO)
Good luck with that 'plan'.
===========
And at 'sky ape' (truncated version): You must 'think' that "the common man" is even more stupid than yourself. When they go to purchase fuel and there isn't any to buy and/or the price has doubled, they just aren't going to notice. How convenient. ROF. And although I may be naive, that would make you a self-alleged proud high-priest apologist for a dying paradigm.
User avatar
lonewolf
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun 06 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: past tense

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby mcgowanjm » Thu 07 Jan 2010, 13:00:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lonewolf', 'A')s to "which one" you are, that is for you to determine.
=========

Not "my numbers" - rather from multiple allegedly informed sources - including (not limited to) http://www.energybulletin.net/node/41707
http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=73581
http://www.post1.net/lowem/entry/mexico ... in_7_years
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/01 ... ntare.html

However, regardless of which 'number set' one happens to chose/believe, the trend line is clear, accelerating and the end is nigh.

But you can 'prove' me wrong by 'kindly' showing us in 'official' terms where Mexico can continue to export a Mbpd to anyone and still meet domestic demand - if you can.


I've been watching Cantarell since before Katrina.

I'm going with this:


As we last reported, in May 2009, Cantarell Field's April 2009 production averaged 713,000 barrels per day, down from 862,060 barrels per day in late 2008.

Now, according to a September 9, 2009 article in the Wall Street Journal, Cantarell is down to 500,000 barrels per day. (presumably for August 2009, and not yet plotted on the above graph). This represents a 30 % drop over only 4 months, which far exceeds the last calculated decline rate of 35 % PER YEAR.

http://peakopps.blogspot.com/2009/09/ca ... -peak.html

And the Decline of 35% is still underway, so, Jan 14, 2010
Pemex issues it's semi annual report:

SWAG: Cantarell pumping maybe 400 kbpd now, dropping to a flatline
of less than 200kbpd by Jan 2011.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby TheDude » Thu 07 Jan 2010, 18:08:06

Sources for my info:

You need the Net Imports info from the EIA, then factor in that Mexico imports 550 kb/d, while at the same time exporting 192 kb/d - in 2008, this figure could very likely vanish in coming years owing to state stricture to maintain adequate supplies for domestic markets, i.e., politics at work. If you subtract the 330 kb/d the US exports to Mexico you are left with 220 kb/d they obtain from other nations, primarily Venezuela.

The Pemex homepage has historic data for the country as a whole, for monthly updates to field production go to SIE :: Sistema de Información Energética. This is a Spanish-only site but it is easy enough to find the field data.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Cantarell at 25% of Peak

Postby pup55 » Mon 01 Mar 2010, 14:19:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ostly it was a controlled decline with a predictable outcome for the trend


Sorry for joining this conversation late.

I suppose that in Espanol, "technical nerd" is "El Nerd Techinico"...

so if I was "El Nerd Technico" at my desk in the bowels of the oil ministry, and wanted to maximize my production long-term, and I knew that Cantarell was collapsing, and I knew that my big export customer (the US) demand is down some percentage.....maybe 6% versus 2007, right?

What I would do is deliberately reduce production out of Cantarell to give it a bit of a rest which, from what I understand, actually "works".... I would run my other, healthy fields at or near capacity to keep that oil money flowing, until the drug business can get big enough to support the country.

So I guess a project would be to check the rest of their field data, see if the production has been fairly flat since before the crash and then you might be able to figure out whether they are thinking the same way....

What I am really saying is, there may be some other logic behind it.

Either that or we're screwed.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Cid_Yama » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 02:36:32

From August 2009:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he giant Cantarell oil field, the world's eighth largest will be dead by the end of next year. Output peaked in 2004/2005 at around 2.2 million barrels a day (mbd) but will be well below the 0.5 mpd predicted by the end of 2009 - and extrapolating its apparently linear decline, it will be around zero by the end of 2010. Cantarell was a late field, since it was discovered in 1976, by which time there was a host of new technology available to make sure it kept pumping out oil, and by pressurizing the field, oil was pumped out at around 2 mbd for several years, when without this help a field would normally be expected to fall into decline.

However, a well only has so much oil to begin with and the faster this is recovered the quicker it becomes exhausted. It is likely therefore that the depletion side of Hubbert's peak will be a far steeper decline than the incline that rose to it, for many fields around the world, and it is debatable just how much recoverable oil there is all told. It has been suggested that the use of enhanced recovery techniques - i.e. pumping millions of barrels of seawater per day into e.g. the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia has damaged the geological structure, meaning that less of its oil will ultimately be recovered.

link

Mexico is now trying to hide the fact that Cantarell is dead.

C'mon folks. This is PeakOil.com. The Death of Cantarell should be big news. Even if they are trying to hide it, WE should know.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby cipi604 » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 03:03:41

we already knew
User avatar
cipi604
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Cid_Yama » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 03:15:22

Glad YOU knew. WE knew it was in rapid decline and predicted to be dead in 2014. Not 2010.

I hadn't seen anybody post the obituary for Cantarell yet. But apparently it's dead.

They are offering bonuses to any oil company that can bring in a big deepwater find quickly, offering bonuses for volume and speed.

We are talking desperation on the part of Mexico.

Bet they wish they could have the oil back they lost to Ixtoc.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Quinny » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 03:31:58

Anyone got detailed (monthly) figures for last couple of years on Cantarell?
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby anador » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 03:55:38

Just wondering, but will a major exporter suddenly curtailing trade effect different parts of the country disproportionately? Presumably a majority of cantarell oil flows to refineries in a certain region.

Does anyone know any statistics about this?

Could there be local effects experienced somewhere in the US that are not felt elsewhere?
@#$% highways
User avatar
anador
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 17:31:18

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Pops » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 07:12:59

Cid the blog you linked to cites no sources, there are some links for Viagra in the comments tho...

Mexico is our #2 supplier @ 1.2Mb/d way behind Canada at 2.5Mb/d followed by our other friends KSA and Venezuela at around 1.0. Mexico will be a net importer by '15 if you can believe the EIA

I don't know a lot about field tech but I think you can either get a lot of production fast or a greater percent recovered but not both at this point.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Pops » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 07:22:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anador', 'C')ould there be local effects experienced somewhere in the US that are not felt elsewhere?

That's a good question. I'd just guess unless the state decides to cut off exports befor that bottom-of-the-glass sucking sound, the timeline is already baked in with other suppliers. Here is a map of pipelines I found, oil and gas to CA and TX - then on to the midwest... I suppose there will be a higher cost for shipment from more distant suppliers.

Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Cid_Yama » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 08:13:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hris Nelder, energy analyst and author of Profit from the Peak, also watches Mexico quite keenly and we both had an enormously long telephone call about Cantarell back in early January, of this year 2009. While we both have been tracking the decline of Mexico’s oil production for years, and knew that Cantarell was crashing, I was shocked when Chris said, “Oh yeah. That field could head below 500 thousand barrels a day (kb/day) by the end of this year.”

Now, one has to realize that this conversation was occurring just after New Year’s, and the most recently available data was for November, which had closed out just 5 weeks earlier. In that month, Cantarell produced 862 kb/day. In addition, Cantarell had started 2008 with January production of 1243 kb/day. Now let’s look at Cantarell’s production numbers for the most recent month of 2009, in July: 588 kb/day. As someone remarked on The Oil Drum, this looks to be a linear, rather than an exponential decline. Interesting observation. If Cantarell is indeed losing a steady 35 kb/day a month in production, then by Christmas of next year we’ll be close to zero.

link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nother month, another decline for Cantarell...

1243000 1.2008
1192000 2.2008
1110000 3.2008
1074000 4.2008
1038000 5.2008
1017000 6.2008
1010000 7.2008
988100 8.2008
940020 9.2008
901796 10.2008
862060 11.2008
811000 12.2008
772000 1.2009
744778 2.2009
754063 3.2009
713036 4.2009
692925 5.2009
658700 6.2009
588210 7.2009

link
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Top

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Pops » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 08:24:47

Country......Aug-10.......YTD 2010.......Aug-09....... YTD 2009
MEXICO.......1,158.......... 1,119 ............1,057............1,119
EIA, 10/28/2010
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Mexico Cantarell Oil Field Dead by End of 2010

Postby Cid_Yama » Thu 04 Nov 2010, 08:30:19

From May 2010:

Cantarell Finally Slips Below 500 kbpd
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s you can see from the chart, Cantarell Crude Oil Production 2008 – 2010, Mexico’s single giant finally slipped below 500 thousand barrels per day of production in May, to 499,286 kbpd. It’s still pretty astonishing to reflect that just two years ago, Cantarell was still producing a million barrels per day. The Mexican government, like the average layperson, continues to trade publicly in the idea that some new discovery could occur in Mexico that would alter the country’s production decline. But unlike the layperson, PEMEX knows better. (Indeed, insider reports on PEMEX indicate they’ve known for years).

link

chart
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron