by killJOY » Tue 11 Mar 2008, 13:54:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t heart, he seems like a humble man to me. He believes life is inherently tragic and humanity, full of hubris as always, continues to believe we can cheat nature and now nature is about to get really pissed.
Sorry, dino, but this strikes me as utter bullshit.
I started out liking Kunstler (via End of Suburbia), but the more I read and listen, the LESS humble, the MORE CAREERIST he sounds.
He's pimping a goddamn novel, for chrissakes.
Think of Richard Pryor vs Eddy Murphy.
Pryor was truly a visionary, someone who never spared himself, even, to utter the unpleasant truths about race.
Murphy, on the other hand, made millions being a smart-ass who made fun of people.
Kunstler is the Eddy Murphy of peak oil, a crude, exploitative bastard who laughs at his own jokes.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile you may disagree with his conclusions, why denigrate the man? Writers put themselves at risk of ridicule when they offer their own views; that should foment discussion of the ideas, not the person making them. Those who disagree should should state their arguments to the contrary and let the reader decide. Attacks on the man don't offer much enlightenment.
He's a novelist: he makes shit up.