by BigTex » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 01:24:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')'ve been waiting for the demise of capitalism, hoping I suppose that I might outlive it.
As a Marxist, it is self evident that a system based around the wasteful use of common resources is doomed to regress us back to a brutal age in due course due to depletion.
However, given the current corporate acculturated climate, I suspect that the slide out of civilisation will be protracted but the drop into barbarism will be swift and brutal.
You think capitalism is wasteful? Dude, you've seen nothing yet. Your dear socialistic system is uncomparably more wasteful.
By the way, why didnt u move to a socialist country? Its nice I am sure to be a marxist and live in capitalist country. I already picture myself, college professor, Trotsky-style beard and and a lot of passion in the voice.
Reminds me of Al Haig talking about Moscow after the fall of communism. He said something to the effect of:
"In Moscow, it's not uncommon to see a limo pull up in front of a fancy hotel and a young millionaire will get out with a beautiful woman on each arm. It's like you're in Hollywood,
except there are no communists."
I thought that was hilarious, especially from a grouch like Al Haig.

by mos6507 » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 01:32:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')I get a doomer boner about every seven years.
Could be a new population control strategy
It obviously didn't work. Doesn't he have 5 kids already?
by BigTex » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 02:18:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')I get a doomer boner about every seven years.
Could be a new population control strategy
It obviously didn't work. Doesn't he have 5 kids already?
I didn't say those were the ONLY boners I got.
And come on, we're talking allegorical boners here anyway. About the only thing a doomer boner could impregnate would be a gun cabinet.
As for the more traditional non-ideological style of erection, those come more regularly and have assisted in the creation of three very fine looking children, the conception of which didn't seem to have any relation at all to doom cycles.
In fact, I'm pretty sure doom was nowhere in my thoughts as the baby batter was being mixed.
BigTex riding the range:
"Get along little dogies!"
![XXspermy [smilie=XXspermy.gif]](https://udev.peakoil.com/forums/images/smilies/XXspermy.gif)
by americandream » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 03:48:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')'ve been waiting for the demise of capitalism, hoping I suppose that I might outlive it.
As a Marxist, it is self evident that a system based around the wasteful use of common resources is doomed to regress us back to a brutal age in due course due to depletion.
However, given the current corporate acculturated climate, I suspect that the slide out of civilisation will be protracted but the drop into barbarism will be swift and brutal.
You think capitalism is wasteful? Dude, you've seen nothing yet. Your dear socialistic system is uncomparably more wasteful.
By the way, why didnt u move to a socialist country? Its nice I am sure to be a marxist and live in capitalist country. I already picture myself, college professor, Trotsky-style beard and and a lot of passion in the voice.
How difficult is it for you to get your head round the simple concept that an industrial system devoted to wants and not needs is unsustainable.
Is that so far off your radar?
by vision-master » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 09:33:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')'ve been waiting for the demise of capitalism, hoping I suppose that I might outlive it.
As a Marxist, it is self evident that a system based around the wasteful use of common resources is doomed to regress us back to a brutal age in due course due to depletion.
However, given the current corporate acculturated climate, I suspect that the slide out of civilisation will be protracted but the drop into barbarism will be swift and brutal.
You think capitalism is wasteful? Dude, you've seen nothing yet. Your dear socialistic system is uncomparably more wasteful.
By the way, why didnt u move to a socialist country? Its nice I am sure to be a marxist and live in capitalist country. I already picture myself, college professor, Trotsky-style beard and and a lot of passion in the voice.
How difficult is it for you to get your head round the simple concept that an industrial system devoted to wants and not needs is unsustainable.
Is that so far off your radar?
Seen a interesting show on health care last night (PBS). Our great capitalistic health care system ranks 37 and is MORE expensive than those socialistic systems. Go figure.

by jlw61 » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 10:56:34
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')'ve been waiting for the demise of capitalism, hoping I suppose that I might outlive it.
As a Marxist, it is self evident that a system based around the wasteful use of common resources is doomed to regress us back to a brutal age in due course due to depletion.
However, given the current corporate acculturated climate, I suspect that the slide out of civilisation will be protracted but the drop into barbarism will be swift and brutal.
You think capitalism is wasteful? Dude, you've seen nothing yet. Your dear socialistic system is uncomparably more wasteful.
By the way, why didnt u move to a socialist country? Its nice I am sure to be a marxist and live in capitalist country. I already picture myself, college professor, Trotsky-style beard and and a lot of passion in the voice.
How difficult is it for you to get your head round the simple concept that an industrial system devoted to wants and not needs is unsustainable.
Is that so far off your radar?
Marxism, like many "isms" fail to take into one very basic concept: human nature. "From each, according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" works great if there is no greed, lust, or desire. Socialism fails because there are always those who insist on being in charge "for the good of the people". While, in a perfect world it can work, we live in a very imperfect world and socialism, to date, has caused a lot of pain and suffering to it's people.
Is capitalism better? Well, since it's not a political system, it's like comparing apples and potatoes. The two are not related. Capitalism, as China shows, can live in a socialist/communist country. It's a form of economics.
Are you able to see the problem with this argument?
So what form of political thought can help? It must understand that human nature has this problem with selfish desires. While it would be impossible to create the perfect government because of human nature, it is possible to create a better government that what the US currently has. That government would require a few things to work, at a minimum, and they are:
1) Government that is designed solely to protect the rights of it's citizens and has clearly delineated powers granted to it by the citizens.
2) A constitution that clearly puts limits on the government, which acknowledges the unalienable rights of people.
3) Laws that protect the rights of the individual from others and the group.
4) Laws that recognize only people have rights, not corporations, not governments (Corporations are business entities that protect owners and provide a multi-state or multi-national presence while governments have duties that obligate it to its citizens needs).
5) Clearly delineated separation of powers between multiple government entities that can not be handed off to subordinate agencies.
Then the citizens of this wonderful country need to be taught at a young age and throughout their lives to understand:
1) It is their duty to jealously guard against the excess of government and to fight any signs of such excess.
2) That their rights are limited only to the point where their activities interfere with another person's rights.
3) Should they violate another person's rights, they will be punished and required to compensate the person they wronged, no exceptions.
4) That we are on this finite world with others and the world and others should be treated with respect.
Unfortunately, while such a system actually could work quite well, as it takes into account human desires and needs, I'm sure over time there would be those who would work against it. Such people would desire power, money, etc for their own ends. Unfortunately there is no easy fix for that short of termination with extreme prejudice (which would go against this above stated philosophy).
Such a form of political thought is called Libertarianism. Libertarianism does have it's failings, but it is a hell of a lot better than any of the systems we've tried so far. While the US did not get it right, we did get a taste of it. However, the system was easily corrupted over time and now it looks like we may have to start over at some time in the near future. Luckily for those responsible for that event, the constitution and bill of rights are there as a guide to something better. I simply hope they take advantage of history's lessons and have the courage to give freedom a try.
When somebody makes a statement you don't understand, don't tell him he's crazy. Ask him what he means. -- Otto Harkaman, Space Viking
by jlw61 » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 16:51:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'O')ne thing about Libertarianism, there is no tolerance for differences of opinion. Libertarianism talks about freedom, but in reality is another political philosophy (smoke and mirrors) for a fascist state.

That's a nice statement! Care to back it up with any facts?
When somebody makes a statement you don't understand, don't tell him he's crazy. Ask him what he means. -- Otto Harkaman, Space Viking
-

jlw61
- Tar Sands

-
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon 03 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
- Location: Sunny Virginia, USA
-
by mos6507 » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 17:02:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jlw61', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'O')ne thing about Libertarianism, there is no tolerance for differences of opinion. Libertarianism talks about freedom, but in reality is another political philosophy (smoke and mirrors) for a fascist state.

That's a nice statement! Care to back it up with any facts?
Has strict libertarianism ever been put into practice to know whether it works or not?