by dashster » Sat 29 Nov 2014, 01:12:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dashster', 'I') don't think you have given it much thought.
Didn't have to. There is a concept called being scalable.
Give me what you estimate is the cost to build track. This site says
1 to 2 million per mil. Let's use 2 million per mile. To build an extra track we get:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', '
miles cost
New York San Francisco 2910 $5,820,000,000.00
Charleston, SC Los Angeles 2495 $4,990,000,000.00
Seattle San Diego 1254 $2,508,000,000.00
Minneapolis San Antonio 1223 $2,446,000,000.00
Portland, MA Miami, FL 1602 $3,204,000,000.00
Portland, MA Seattle, WA 3155 $6,310,000,000.00
12,649 $25,278,000,000.00')
The issue is complicated by the fact that there are already double tracks in areas and there are also certain spots where putting an extra track would be very expensive (new bridge, new tunnel, new right of way in built-up area). And you can get a big gain from an extra track, even if it is single track through a tunnel or over a bridge in spots.
But for cost comparison, the military spends in a $30,000,000,000.00 dollars in a 10 year period on just the DDG 51 Burke-class Aegis Destroyer. That is more than the cost to do 12,649 miles of railroad track at $2 million per mile. A lot of steel would be freed up as well if we stopped building DDG 51 Burke-class Aegis Destroyers.