by MonteQuest » Sun 23 Nov 2014, 15:28:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', ' ')I don't expect TPTB to get their BAU very much in the future.
They will do the right thing as soon as they get done trying everything else.
I am looking at what might possibly work, not what might pass the current congress. If they can convert coal to liquid fuel at a profit by growing corn let them ,but don't mandate or subsidize it. Few tractors run on coal so it is only useful as a heat source at the refinery or for electricity to run the pumps.
Keeping the status quo in my view is out of the question. What the best alternative course is, is the question.
But the right thing is reducing the population to a level that can be sustained without fossil fuels.
That isn't going to happen, except by Nature's hand.
Coal would provide the heat for the distillation process to make ethanol or biodiesel to run in tractors.
Of course keeping the status quo is out of the question, but the question is what can you get done in a gridlocked Congress here in the US?
My point of this thread is what will TPTB do to
increase liquid fuel supply?
Will the govt step in with support for fracking when it becomes uneconomical to produce?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."