by MrBill » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 13:29:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gt1370a', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o based on The Efficient Market Theory we should expect gold to be $495, the euro to be $1.1885, crude to be $58.25, the DJIA to be 10.805 and housing prices to be approximately what they are today. They may not be in one year's time, in which case there is money to be made being a market contrarian and betting that your inside knowledge and skill as an investor is better than everyone else's?
Surely this is not a correct application of Efficient Market? That prices never change because everything is known?I remember somebody saying that peak oil can't be for real because if it was then the market would have crashed already, based on Efficient Market Hypothesis. But simply knowing that one day oil will peak is not enough - you'd need to know when. If you decide to go with Deffeyes and bet 2005, so you put the S&P right now, then you could beat the market next year if Deffeyes was right. If he's wrong, you'll lose. There are a number of people betting each way, and the aggregate effect of that is Efficient Market - right? The market arrives at a price based on all the known information, such as historical price trends, Deffeyes' prediction, the USGS prediction, etc.