by Roy » Fri 21 May 2010, 08:08:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')magine, no more tax returns or IRS
A dream come true.
Which I don't think will ever happen as long as the corpgov is still in charge: raising money to pay interest to central bankers and making handouts to multinational corporations.
Instead of a gas tax, they will implement a VAT. I don't know if you all saw anything about this, but the IMF is currently doing an audit of the United States' finances. Also, for countries that are 'at risk', or deeply indebted, like us. We'll pay interest on our debt as long as the rep/dem status quo continues.
To whom? The ones who own EVERYTHING. [look around yourself, and think about how many of those cars, houses, and businesses you see are owned by banks versus owned by a person]. I'd venture to say roughly 80% of everything in sight is owned by some bank/financial institution. That created the money basically out of thin air, and then charges on interest on money they created themselves. Hell of a racket, but it sucks for the debtors. Americans, as individuals, and as members of the 'public'.
I think the gas tax would be a great idea. I wish the sovereigns would just tell these shyster international bankers to go piss up a rope, default, and start spending all the interest payments on transitioning economies for the real future we face, not some fantasy of endless growth which still seems to be the dominant meme in DC and other first world capitals.
time to get outside now and get some chores done...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he United States’ national debt will soon reach 100 percent of gross domestic product, the International Monetary Fund predicts in a new report.
The sharp rise in U.S. debt started in 2006 and by 2015, the IMF suggests, debt could reach more than 100 percent of GDP.
At the end of first quarter of 2010, the gross debt was 87.3 percent of GDP, of which about 56 percent was held by the public, and about 44 percent was intragovernmental, U.S. officials have said.
The IMF predicts that the U.S. would need to reduce its structural deficit by the equivalent of 12 percent of GDP, a much larger portion than any other country analyzed except Japan.
Greece, in the midst of a financial crisis, needs to reduce its structural deficit by just 9 percent of GDP, according to the IMF's analysis.
The IMF also encouraged rich countries including the U.K. to eliminate value- added-tax loopholes to help cut their budget deficits, the Financial Times reported.The IMF said the United Kingdom could raise an amount equivalent to 3.3 percent of GDP, or a third of its estimated deficit, by removing exemptions and improving collection of the sales tax, according to Bloomberg. As the global economy recovers, governments’ fiscal balances are on average continuing to deteriorate, the IMF said.
Meanwhile, the IMF also waded into the debate over healthcare reform, questioning the CBO's analysis that healthcare reform would reduce the U.S. deficit, according to thehill.com.
"There are some risks to the CBO estimates, however, including that the substantial decrease in Medicare payment rates to healthcare providers may prove difficult to implement," the report reads.
President Barack Obama has established a fiscal commission to make recommendations on addressing the nation's fiscal woes.
end article-
The recent global crisis has shown that the health of a country's financial sector has far reaching implications for its economy. The IMF's Financial Sector Assessment Program is a voluntary, comprehensive and in-depth analysis of a country's financial sector. Established in 1999, in the aftermath of the Asian crisis, the assessments are conducted by joint Bank-Fund teams in developing and emerging market countries and by the Fund alone in advanced economies. Assessments are assisted by experts from cooperating agencies, such as national central banks and financial supervisors. To date, more than three-quarters of the member countries have undergone assessments, many of them more than once.
The focus of FSAP assessments is twofold: to gauge the stability of the financial sector and to assess its potential contribution to growth and development.
To assess the stability of the financial sector, FSAP teams examine the soundness of the banking and other financial sectors; conduct stress tests; rate the quality of bank, insurance, and financial market supervision against accepted international standards; and evaluate the ability of supervisors, policymakers, and financial safety nets to respond effectively in case of systemic stress. While FSAPs do not evaluate the health of individual financial institutions and cannot predict or prevent financial crises, they identify the main vulnerabilities that could trigger one.
To assess the development aspects of the financial sector, FSAPs examine the quality of the legal framework and of financial infrastructure, such as the payments and settlements system; identify obstacles to the competitiveness and efficiency of the sector; and examine its contribution to economic growth and development. Issues related to access to banking services and the development of domestic capital markets are particularly important in low-income countries.
Many systemically important countries have participated, including most G-20 members.