by Loki » Mon 22 Mar 2010, 18:18:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '
')Now, what you may have been doing is simply relying on the tax payer to provide the stated bronze plan implicitly, because you know, that if you did get cancer, and consequently lost your ability to work and ending up on state support; it is exactly the tax payer that would be paying for your chemo, surgery, or other drugs. Perhaps you entertained the rationalization that if you got one of these crippling diseases that you'd just go out in your backyard and eat a bullet; most do not do so. And a contract between you and the society saying that YOU would be different and do so, would not be binding.
So you get to suck it up, pay your $100/mo in health taxes, and ditch the implicit reliance upon the taxpayer in the event of your unlikely disease-ification.
Actually, for nearly all the 2000s I had employer-based health insurance---also lived in Canada for part of that decade, so I was covered by their most excellent system. Over the last 10 years, I used my insurance to get glasses a couple times, one tetanus shot, one teeth cleaning, and one physical exam. That's it. My employers paid a small fortune for those very simple procedures.
I lost my health insurance in December 09 thanks to a layoff. I feel fortunate to have found a job on an organic farm that starts in May---barely above min wage, no bennies.
Your math assumes a low level of health problems. A more serious problem, or series of problems over 2+ years, would still utterly bankrupt a low income worker with a policy like this.
A garden will make your rations go further.