by Carlhole » Tue 16 Feb 2010, 01:44:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kpeavey', 'C')ontrary to what Carlhole said, many of us have done our homework...
Again, the only "us" you'll ever hear about on this site are those whose doom fantasies are bolstered by the groupthink here. Far more people are "peak oil aware" elsewhere. They have read the books, the hundreds of articles, seen the movies, have made investment decisions based on what they have investigated, etc. However, on a site like PeakOil.com, doomers are the only ones who stick around - quoting each other, agreeing with one another, and otherwise reinforcing the clusterf%*k concensus.
Take a look at the Google Trends graph of the general interest in the subject of peak oil:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=peak+oilInterest is fairly steady but is trending downwards.
If you want to read a good anti-doomer study of the subject of peak oil, I recommend
The Age Of Oil: The Mythology, History, and Future of the World's Most Controversial Resource. This book was written with the peak oil crowd in mind. If your first inclination is to refuse to even read the book, then you can be fairly well-assured that you are merely one who has drunk too much of the doomer kool-aid (rather than someone who seriously investigates all sides of an important debate).
I always like to refer
FatherOfTwo's last post. He was someone who really investigated all aspects of the peak oil debate thoroughly and conscientiously. He REALLY "did his homework" on this subject over a period of about 4 years. I miss his contributions.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', ' ')I'm going to throw this thread off on a bit of a tangent, the only reason I'm doing so is because I received a PM about it. I was originally going to reply directly via the PM, but perhaps this will be read and appreciated by others. Apologies if this tangent annoys you.
Honestly I don't follow peakoil.com that much anymore (although I do pop in every now and then to the economic forum to read MrBill's very, very insightful posts) Here's why I don't follow it too much anymore, and why I would suggest doing a lot more reading before taking the "doomer's prep stage":
I started reading and researching peak oil in 2004 (as you can see by my join date and number of posts) It rattled me extensively as I was seriously uneducated about the topic at the time. I became a frequent visitor to this site and my appetite for energy related news and information became ravenous. I also became pretty depressed about the whole thing.
Over the years I have done a tremendous amount more reading and I've also attended the UofC's IEEE speaker sessions too. (I highly recommend those) With much more info under my belt and 4 years of reflection, I have a very different point of view now - and that is that we are headed for a gut wrenching adjustment, but doom due to peak oil is not on the horizon. This thread is not the place for me to extrapolate on my position.
In general I think blukatzen has good recommendations: living locally and sustainably is good regardless of what happens with Peak Oil. But as someone who has 4 years of this topic under his belt, I'd caution you to do more research before "prepping". peakoil.com is slanted hard towards the doomer side of things, and as with any topic it's best to get all the facts and a full sampling of viewpoints before betting the ranch on any one outcome.
I'm willing to discuss things further via PM but this thread isn't the place to continue any discussions on this matter.
Cheers and best of luck,
FoT