Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Gas-to-Liquids (GTL)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby VMarcHart » Thu 13 Aug 2009, 09:08:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', 'M')oney is energy.
Come again?
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby copious.abundance » Thu 13 Aug 2009, 16:05:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '1')) Money is energy. No energy, no money. Again that
quadrillion ($1.4 quadrillion+). In debt. Meaning money
already spent. Meaning amy money has to pay off this
debt before any more debt can be issued.

*sigh* Why do I bother? :roll:

That $1.4 quadrillion in "debt" you spoke of refers to the amount in derivatives and is not even debt - derivatives are simply bets. If I bet $50 that X will happen, that means another person has also bet $50 with me that X won't happen. When X does or doesn't happen, no money gets wiped out, it just exchanges hands.

In other words, your concern has absolutely nothing to do with what I pointed out about the ability of companies to raise capital to build natural gas or other projects.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '2')) The five Kings are now in decline. Cantarell will be below
500k bpd this time next year.

That's only 1 king. And there will be others to replace it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '3')) Gas is not fungible. You cannot replace a gallon of
gasoline with a gallon of gas. LNG is the one fungible aspect of the NatGas business:

"Traditionally, LNG has been base loaded, but I think increasingly LNG is going to ... come to be recognized in a much different way in U.S. markets, particularly foreign LNG, because it is the one fungible aspect of the natural gas business. ... You can take a cargo that's en route from "Trinidad Tobago," which is our largest supplier of LNG today, and you can divert it en route, and you can't do that in the pipeline business. So it gives you physical ... [options], it gives you financial ... [options], and so increasingly I think we will see LNG operate in a very flexible fashion."

July 17, 2009

Telecommunications giant AT&T says that it will renovate its gasoline-powered fleet of vehicles so that they can use alternative fuels such as natural gas. Over the next five years, it will convert 8,000 of those cars. It then hopes to have 15,000 clean-burning vehicles on the road by 2019. Altogether, about 120,000 natural gas-fueled vehicles are now in operation in this country. That doesn't even cover the cash for clunkers program.

It's funny you should tell me that natural gas is not fungible, and then in the very next paragraph give an example of natural gas being fungible. :lol: Those 8,000 AT&T vans will run on CNG! :lol:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:56:31

We're gonna have fun. You and I . [smilie=book1.gif]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat $1.4 quadrillion in "debt" you spoke of refers to the amount in derivatives and is not even debt - derivatives are simply bets.


See, the above is THE reason why this is our Last Depression.

Your bosses think just like you. We can treat derivatoves like credit but it's not debt. There is no counter party to your bet.

No clearinghouse.

Someone owes someone but someone's not gonna get paid.
And it's also like five people taking out insurance on your house.

Then stacking cans of gasoline around it. All the while Enronesque Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV) are placed
offshore where accountants can't find 'em.

And I'm just scratching the surface.
Toxic Loans Topping 5% May Push 150 Banks to Point of No Return ...
Aug 14, 2009 ... More than 150 publicly traded US lenders own nonperforming loans that equal 5 percent or more of their holdings, a level that former ...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid..

Now-

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's only 1 king. And there will be others to replace it.


You're serious. Let's bring in pup55 and Dante'sPeak. SEE what they think.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ltogether, about 120,000 natural gas-fueled vehicles are now in operation in this country.


I put that in to show you how far we have to go to retrofit
America's infrastructure. The above is .003 % of our fleet?
Let's compromise. Gas is not fungible like oil.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby shortonsense » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 23:25:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', ' ') Gas is not fungible like oil.


fungible - a commodity that is freely interchangeable with another in satisfying an obligation

I imagine that the Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Australia might discuss how wonderfully fungible natural gas is among themselves, considering the volume of it they ship around.

And considering the sheer quantity of the stuff laying around the planet, its most reasonable to think that this type of trade will only grow through time. Certainly peak oil a few years back certainly hasn't seemed to give any indication of stopping it, or even slowing it down.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby copious.abundance » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 19:25:42

mcgowanjm you are incoherent. Among other things you went from talking about derivatives to mentioning non-performing loans as if they were all one and the same issue, even though that's like saying roast beef is the same thing as a salad. :roll:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 08:47:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'm')cgowanjm you are incoherent. Among other things you went from talking about derivatives to mentioning non-performing loans as if they were all one and the same issue, even though that's like saying roast beef is the same thing as a salad.


So incoherence means 'you don't understand.'

A couple of definitions are in order:

Toxic assets: Toxic = Fraud, assets = horse race tickets.

See 99.9% of people will throw their tickets on the florr after the race and their horse didn't win. the Top Decile are holding onto
theirs, expecting them to be good after the next race.

At the same time they do not acknowledge their debt, these tickets are kept on the books as.

You're right. This debt shouldn't exist. When it is marked down
the derivative won't exist and the debt will be cleared.

Unfortunately, the holder of the fraudulent horse race ticket owner will now be insolvent.

Sub the Top 5 US banks for horse ticket owner. :?
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 08:59:32

Roast beef, salad and the check please.

I notice that you didn't bring up insurance with the derivatives as debt.

for one thing, your bosses made sure that the word "swap"
was used everytime the word "insurance" was needed
in order to keep those pesky regulators out of the scheme. :twisted:

Dear Maria – Credit protection through a credit derivative is practically equivalent to insurance. Consequently, a credit derivative that has underlying non-performing debt is like a life insurance policy written on a dead person. Dr. Risk thinks it makes sense for an insurance company to write a life insurance policy on a dead person, but it may not make sense for a credit derivatives desk to offer credit protection on non-performing debt. http://www.margrabe.com/CreditDerivatives.html Or:

“Without nightly margin supervision on CDS short positions these vehicles have turned into the means to launch monstrous focused attacks on specific companies; the buyer has limited risk and virtually unlimited reward.

This is exactly like me buying fire insurance on your house, and in addition I can name the amount of insurance I want to buy, even exceeding the house’s value!

How nervous will you get if I buy $10 million in “fire insurance” against your $100,000 bungalow and then start stacking up gasoline cans in my driveway?"

A used horse race ticket couple with insurance that it will be
good and no counterparty risk. That's where we are.
Oh yeah, and the FedRes saying they'll back this up with taxpayer $$$. $23.7 Trillion. One year. Interest Only on the Quadrillion. 8)
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 09:10:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aking matter worse: Most of the additional market exposure came from off-balance-sheet derivatives, giving the appearance to investors that the funds’ portfolios were not highly leveraged and therefore more fiscally sound than what was reality. And despite the fact that both the Core Bond fund and the Champion Fund were highly exposed to commercial mortgage-backed securities, detailed information regarding the extent of that over-concentration was and is no where to be found in any of Oppenheimer’s marketing materials or on Web site.

The ramifications of Oppenheimer’s behind-the-scenes gamble with derivative bets gone bad have been painful for investors. In particular, parents who invested in several state-run college savings plan are facing major financial losses because of portfolios containing the sinking Oppenheimer funds. To top it off, the losses hit the most conservative plans the hardest.


This is what Denninger means when he states that these Fraudulent Horse Race tickets must be cleared from the system.
Because all debt vehicles will be looked on with
suspicion. Because no one knows if the debt they're buying is performing or not. Only hard green cash and actuals (commodities
in hand) will be traded.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 09:29:09

I'll give you this OilFinder. Debt should have zero to do with structured financial derivatives. Which is why I as a Commodities Trader had nothing to do with them back in 1980.

what started it all:

[PDF]
Options Trading in Agricultural Commodities
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View
sellers. This ban on options in agricultural commodities remained in effect until President Reagan signed into law the Futures Trading Act of 1982. ...
agecon.uwyo.edu/RiskMgt/.../OptionsTradinginAgCommodi.pdf

debt is the amount needed to pay off the Faudulent horse race tickets which the parent (now the Us Gov't) doesn't have.

All of this should've been taken care of in 1985, but now it's too late. Denninger again:

" 8O Bernanke's entire thesis is that the crack addict will be ok IF HE CAN JUST HAVE ONE MORE HIT OFF THE PIPE.

But the crack addict is currently on the ground grasping his chest, as he's suffering a heart attack. Another hit of crack will not make the suffering addict better and in fact he can't get the pipe up to his lips even if he wanted to!"
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 09:43:39

You strike me as particularly coherent McG (Oily will think I'm just butting in to disagree but, I actually mean it) :-D
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Natural Gas can not replace depleting petroleum reserves.

Postby mcgowanjm » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 10:08:47

Thanx, SG.

We have a chance staying local and out of debt. And that's all you can ask for.

Sincerely, James [smilie=lookround.gif]
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby bratticus » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 09:30:20

Since only the tiniest number of people on the planet have any conception of what Micro-GTL is I will start out by giving an example since that's one of the simplest way to explain.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')u]Alchem Fuelformer™ (link)

micro-GTL processing

The Fuelformer™ is a skid-mounted, self-contained, portable, automated, micro-GTL plant that provides robust and reliable gas processing services. Its size allows it to be modularized into multi-unit applications so that GTL services can be sized to fit the customer's needs, with facilities that can be easily expanded or downsized as gas supplies grow or decline.

Fuelformer™ applications include: gas well production, flare elimination, and lean methane streams that include coalmine and coal bed methane, landfill gas, composting, and industrial digesters.


Given that flaring gas is harmful in addition to being wasteful and that you cannot get oil out of the ground without causing the gas to come out and that transporting gas is difficult to do, is building the infrastructure to process the gas into a transportable liquid fuel at the source the right approach?
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby shortonsense » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 10:08:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', ' ')is building the infrastructure to process the gas into a transportable liquid fuel at the source the right approach?


For small scale applications, yiou betcha!
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby SeaGypsy » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 11:30:07

Anyone done the EROI on this? Of course it has to be better than flaring it, the wastefullness of that has freaked me out since I was a kid. I would love to know the relative figures besides manufacture/ intallation cost. How much 3 phase power does the gismo use? Conversion ratio etc. I did look at the site, but I am not really good at technical mathematics; any of the experts here got ideas? :)
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby Ferretlover » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 11:42:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'S')ince only the tiniest number of people on the planet have any conception of what Micro-GTL is I will start out by giving an example since that's one of the simplest way to explain.

THANK YOU! The only thing I know about flaring is what my DH has told me--if it's flaring, there's something wrong somewhere.
Nice topic choice. :)
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby SeaGypsy » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:03:22

Don't want to be a party pooper; BUT.
I just dug through the site. Found a few red flags:

1/ The site seems to have had nothing done to it since 2006.

2/ The 'careers' tag brings up 1 job- a product development engineer position.

3/ The products are forecast (in 2006) to be ready in late 07 and 08/ with no updates in 09 at all or since.

4/ The contact page gets office addresses and phone numbers only, outside of the UK. The web address provided in the UK is for a general 'green consultancy' business which doesn't mention this project at all. It is also very short of links and information in general.

I could get either of these websites knocked up out of thin air in a day for peanuts. A couple of people to answer phones in a couple different countries..... Just thinking out loud. 8)
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby Ferretlover » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:21:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'D')on't want to be a party pooper; BUT.
--snip--I could get either of these websites knocked up out of thin air in a day for peanuts. A couple of people to answer phones in a couple different countries..... Just thinking out loud. 8)

Then, I say: Go For It! :lol: Wait until naptime, then, email them or get on the phone! If they no longer deal with this product / process, what has been put in place as a suitable substitute to deal with flaring?
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby SeaGypsy » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:40:47

The main thrust of my points there is that IF this was for real why the amateur website? The idea is fantastic; I do really like it. But having to get on the phone or email another unrelated company for info? In industry this is very unprofessional and therefore; shall we say, a bit sus?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby TheDude » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:21:11

Google is your friend: Micro-GTL - Google Search

Green Car Congress: Energix Research Successfully Tests Micro GTL Process

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3') February 2009

Energix Research, a developer of gas-phase catalysis processes, technologies and systems, says it has successfully produced gas-to-liquids (GTL) products using its electrically activated nanocatalyst process. Energix Research executed the GTL process via the syngas and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis route at a high conversion rate (87%) and selectivity rate (99%).

Energix Research’s process uses electrically activated nanoparticle catalysts supported on a carbon microfibers with high porosity and surface area. This technique reduces the required bulk feed gas temperatures to less than 50% of conventional processes, as the energy of reaction and activation of catalyst is provided directly where it is needed to create very narrowly targeted reactions with high selectivity and yields, according to the company.

The lower bulk gas temperature reduces the capital costs typically associated with exotic metals and energy recovery equipment in GTL refineries while increasing energy efficiency, making Energix’s micro GTL and other chemical plants more affordable.


Somebody linked to this thread in the comments section of this piece, 3 hours ago. Or maybe they're in the Eastern US and just posted...nothing about potential volumes, and first products are methanol and DME. All of these micro techs are intriguing, though.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Is Micro-GTL a Good Techofix for Gas Flaring?

Postby Ferretlover » Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:37:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')he main thrust of my points there is that IF this was for real why the amateur website? The idea is fantastic; I do really like it. But having to get on the phone or email another unrelated company for info? In industry this is very unprofessional and therefore; shall we say, a bit sus?

Oh! I see what you mean now. :lol: I was only focused on the process, not the wider picture! Ah! I'm having a senior day! *giggle*
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron