Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby pablonite » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 13:08:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', ' ')But this would be the case in any collapse scenario unless you're an advocate of butchering all refugees.



Has any other solution to the Zombie Horde problem been offered?

Lawmaker: Climate change just ruse to control population
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_14337716?source=rss
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Rep. Mike Noel, the Legislature's chief climate-change skeptic, declared Thursday that global warming is a conspiracy to control world population.

The House Natural Resources Committee then approved a resolution that expresses the Utah Legislature's belief that "climate alarmists' carbon dioxide-related global warming hypothesis is unable to account for the current downturn in global temperatures."

The resolution, sent to the House on a 10-1 vote, would urge the Environmental Protection Agency to drop plans to regulate the pollution blamed for climate change "until a full and independent investigation of the climate data conspiracy and global warming science can be substantiated."

"We're at the breaking point," said Rep. Kerry Gibson, the resolution's sponsor, who warned that the supply of safe and affordable food is already threatened by over-regulation...

...But Noel defended the "conspiracy" wording, pointing to an out-of-print textbook, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment , written in the 1970s by biologist Paul Ehrlich, Ehrlich's wife, Anne, and physicist John Holdren about the potential hazards of unchecked population.

The Kanab Republican, referring to Holdren as the Obama administration's "energy czar," read from passages of the 1,000-plus-page tome about population-control alternatives that included abortion and forced sterilization. He did not share the authors' conclusion: that voluntary population-limiting methods are "a far better choice."

"Now, if you can't see a connection [of a conspiracy] to that," the legislator said, "you're absolutely blind to what is going on. This is absolutely -- in my mind, this is in fact a conspiracy to limit population not only in this country but across the globe."

The Limits to Growth, The Club of Rome, The Green Revolution...it was an engineered global social revolution and it's all coming to fruition. Some of the frogs are snapping out of the spell cast over them for the last 40 years because seeing is believing! It's all there in black and white, the plan that is, not the science.
User avatar
pablonite
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 13:36:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pablonite', '
')Lawmaker: Climate change just ruse to control population



And population isn't a problem?

I'll believe climate change is a ruse to control population when TPTB make even a slight attempt to control world population. So far, they're still fighting worldwide access to birth control (some conservatives want to do away with it entirely), women's equality (some conservatives think women should be barefoot and pregnant) and many nations still give tax breaks or even cash bonuses for having babies.

Again, this "climate change conspiracy to control us all" is one of the lamest Evil Plans to come along.
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 13:44:56

Ludi, I don't think that's true overall. The UN has very aggressive family planning policies. Here is a clip I cut out of a documentary about the TED conference. This professor modeled fertility and life expectancy. Check out his 2-minute presentation.

<tin foil alert>I think it's really interesting to note that Africa didn't respond to family planning policies and AIDS just happened to conveniently and dramatically reduce their life expectancy.</tin foil alert>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHoX-NDQXsU
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 13:54:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'L')udi, I don't think that's true overall.



Maybe it isn't. But you might notice the nation which uses 25% of the entire world's resources (the US) still encourages reproduction through tax breaks and other benefits, and of course allows immigrants in on the flimsiest of pretexts ("we need more qualified workers").

Maybe the UN has tried to control population, but they have done a totally lame-ass job at it. I don't know why anyone is worried about their Global Warming Master Control Plan having any more of an effect than their population control plan. :|
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 14:12:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', '
')I think the zombie horde problem could be partially resolved due to the hugely increased requirement for agricultural workers. It'd be a delicate time for sure, as these people would need to be fed before they become productive. But this would be the case in any collapse scenario unless you're an advocate of butchering all refugees.


That paragraph opens up quite a lot of issues.

For instance, one can see landowners becoming the new lords of the manor in which ex-urbanites become the new serfs, human beasts of burden who work the farmer's land (because the fuel isn't available for the tractors anymore) in exchange for barely enough scraps to survive. Is that preferable to "green communism"?

Also, the term "partially" implies some acknowledgement of EROEI. If you have a dozen serfs, maybe it's a net gain vs. trying to do everything yourself. If you have a thousand serfs, the mouths to feed exceed the productivity gains of their labor. Negative EROEI. So you just can't find a job for an infinite number of people because the resources of the land reaches a point of diminishing returns. They literally eat you out of house and home.

Most of the time when your ideas are presented (by others) they aren't even qualified with "partially". There is this idea that maybe we aren't really in overshoot, but just our way of life is. So this really cuts to the core of the matter.

Either natural resources will be a limiting factor on population or it won't.

Al Bartlett explained how beyond a certain sweet spot, adding more people drags society down. This would be true of a society with or without fossil fuels. There is only so much food you can produce out of the soil, so much fresh water, so much wood for heating and crafting.

I do expect that people will labor over carrying capacity calculations because they are so elusive, and highly colored by people's emotions (fear, fantasy, greed, guilt, compassion, etc...). Many will make bad calls, either letting too many people in, or not being generous enough.

What I see most likely is that we will be at this crossover point between BAU and post-peak doom in which, at the civic level, there won't even be a recognition of carrying capacity, and so collectively, these seemingly resilient communities, whether they are official transition towns or not, will allow their populations to swell, hence dooming them.

In a slow collapse, creeping demographic changes will be almost impossible to enforce. But it would seemingly be a lot easier to keep people out than to find a way to kick them out after they've settled. You see this play out currently with illegal immigration, and that's far more of a clear-cut case of lawbreaking.

So when people advocate local solutions, you HAVE to consider the above. if you're going to attempt to draw a circle around your town and say with confidence that you can support your community solely on local resources, then you have to find a way to prevent the local population from exceeding carrying capacity, either through immigration or birth rates.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 14:17:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')aybe the UN has tried to control population, but they have done a totally lame-ass job at it. I don't know why anyone is worried about their Global Warming Master Control Plan having any more of an effect than their population control plan. :|


If you're on dial-up, you might not be able to watch that video, but it shows that the UN has actually had pretty darned good success since 1962.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 14:32:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', ' ')it shows that the UN has actually had pretty darned good success since 1962.



And still we have nearly 7 billion people. :| If that's "good success" I wouldn't worry too much about their Global Warming Total World Control plan. :|
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 14:46:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', ' ')it shows that the UN has actually had pretty darned good success since 1962.



And still we have nearly 7 billion people. :| If that's "good success" I wouldn't worry too much about their Global Warming Total World Control plan. :|


Well, Africa was still not responding to family planning. They still are having like 4-7 kids per family while the rest of the world was down to around 1-3 kids per family.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 16:26:47

The relative rate of population growth actually peaked in the 1960's, but the problem is that demographic systems have immense inertia so the absolute rate continues to be substantial. Even under the UN's Low estimate, global population will not peak until 2040.

Another problem is that it seems that one of the most reliable way to actually cut down on fertility rates is industrialization. Africa has high fertility rates because it is poor. They will fall if we manage to get fast economic development rolling there, like it got rolling in China in the 1970's and in India from the 1980's, but then we obviously just get another problem.

Incidentally, pretty much the only poor countries that have managed to cut down their fertility rates to around just the replacement level rate are those with substantial social welfare systems (one major reason for having children is for old-age security) and good women's rights (educated urban women have far fewer children than illiterate rural women).

@mos,

I completely agree, varieties of neo-feudalism will likely become another highlight of collapse. Probably the dominant one if history from the fall of Rome to post-1990 North Korea is any guide.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Olaf » Fri 05 Feb 2010, 16:30:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nother problem is that it seems that one of the most reliable way to actually cut down on fertility rates is industrialization.


Yet industrialization will cause them to require more resources and energy input.
Olaf
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby pablonite » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 23:50:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', ' ')it shows that the UN has actually had pretty darned good success since 1962.
And still we have nearly 7 billion people. :| If that's "good success" I wouldn't worry too much about their Global Warming Total World Control plan. :|
Well, Africa was still not responding to family planning. They still are having like 4-7 kids per family while the rest of the world was down to around 1-3 kids per family.
The UN has a longer history than post ww2, they were first the League of Nations created after WW1.

The league was the brainchild of American president Woodrow Wilson who later admitted to "ruining my country" by selling out America to the bankers by helping to pass the Federal Reserve act in 1913, the year before the first "world war". The UN headquarters and New York Federal Reserve are just down the road from each other in New York City and probably around the corner from a CFR outlet.

If you look at where we today, another world war later with a third seemingly forever threatening, you might want to ask yourself why the mission statements of the central bankers and global politicalians are complete and polar opposites of what they actually do and what has has happened with their hands on the reins for the last 100 years.

The bankers have devalued the currency by %1 every year and the people have been dragged into never ending wars with thousands of military bases spread far and wide.

I don't think we've seen any real effort by TPTB to control population yet because they haven't had their hands on the global population controls for very long now. Global GM food, resource - monetary - military - political - media control...it adds up to population control sooner or later. The programs are being refined on a regional basis to start with, lord help your homeland should it become a target of UN aggression!

They can even convince people to surrender all control over their life into the hands of green communists to save mother earth. The primary weapon is social control and the primary target is to maintain control, population reduction is more of an underlying theme running through the UN.
User avatar
pablonite
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 07 Feb 2010, 10:47:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pablonite', '
')They can even convince people to surrender all control over their life into the hands of green communists to save mother earth.



Which people have been convinced to surrender all control into the hands of green communists?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby davep » Sun 07 Feb 2010, 15:54:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')hat paragraph opens up quite a lot of issues. For instance, one can see landowners becoming the new lords of the manor in which ex-urbanites become the new serfs, human beasts of burden who work the farmer's land (because the fuel isn't available for the tractors anymore) in exchange for barely enough scraps to survive. Is that preferable to "green communism"?
I think you missed the bit where I mentioned Anarchism, which isn't about feudalism.

Where I live we have 10 acres per person, and the whole of the region is the same. I feel we could potentially have five times the population without any risk to the ecosystem if we did it properly.

Even though I own some land, I wouldn't be looking at a feudal scenario.

I think you'd have to put newcomers into a training farm so they can learn the basics. Then, depending on their age, ability etc, they could have a certain amount of land for themselves. I'd look at having specialists such as passive solar home builders, doctors, renewable energy specialists, water retention and land terracing specialists (etc) who could live without needing to tend the land.

I'd be looking at everyone living on the land to make a healthy surplus, so that we could enjoy a relatively decent lifestyle (including supporting the specialists and exporting food if needs be).

The problem would arise when there are too many newcomers. Hopefully other towns would build a similar model, so that we could create a population limit and stick to it. If the standard of living is high enough, this could be the case.

Any newcomers will be armed and be part of the militia. As time goes on it will be natural for people to be armed and available, as in Switzerland.

I make an LH disclaimer here, in that this is in no way a finished philosophy.

There would be one stratum of Government, with all laws requiring general consensus. Hopefully a constitution and bill of rights will be established that governs all other laws. It would be fun to flesh a template out here that could be put to the populace when required, as I'm guessing it would prove difficult to find the time in the painful throes of transition.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Sun 07 Feb 2010, 16:53:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pablonite', 'I') don't think we've seen any real effort by TPTB to control population yet because they haven't had their hands on the global population controls for very long now.


Did you see how fertility rates have plummeted in third world countries in the presentation?
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby pablonite » Sun 07 Feb 2010, 20:06:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'D')id you see how fertility rates have plummeted in third world countries in the presentation?
I got this "This video contains content from SnagFilms LLC, who has decided to block it. "
Agenda 21? There are so many programs being implemented now it gets hard to keep up. I thought the third world was going to be the primary target of carbon taxation and control. Like i said...

Iraq and the sanctions against it supported by the UN since 1991 or so has got to go down as one of the largest wholesale slaughters of women and children in history, mostly absent from the media after the first few years of occupation. To add insult to injury, have the birth place of civilization host the slaughter.

The UN is a blunt tool used to exploit third world countries from Latin America to east Asia for their resources and anything else an occupying army cares to do with a civilian population. The history of this organization is quite horrific when you start looking into it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hich people have been convinced to surrender all control into the hands of green communists?
Green fascism better describes the marriage of state and business?
Image
User avatar
pablonite
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 07 Feb 2010, 20:31:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pablonite', 'G')reen fascism better describes the marriage of state and business?
Can you give some specific examples of green fascism in which people are being forced to, I guess, use fewer resources, pollute less, have fewer children, etc, by corporate-owned government?
Thanks.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Stonemason » Wed 10 Feb 2010, 18:24:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'H')ow can the government solve a problem like societal collapse when they can't seem to do anything well that is even slightly complicated? Why should individuals trust any government when the government has shown that it is only concerned with its own survival?


That is good and valid questions. The thing is, I am not very confident at all about the ability of any government - even one that really understands Limits to Growth - to solve the problem. However, I have zero confidence in the ability of individuals or small communities to solve the problem at the global level - which is ultimately the level that matters most, because our overshoot crisis is global.


That's the thing. The collective is a religious delusion - a concept with no referent in the environment. (ala trees exist, but what is a forest? Can you point to a forest without pointing at individual trees?)

My point being, if individuals cannot do something, neither can a group of individuals who separate themselves and label themselves a separate species (called "the government") who claim to have different properties than other human beings and different rights which contradict all logical reasoning.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 10 Feb 2010, 18:33:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', 'M')y point being, if individuals cannot do something, neither can a group of individuals who separate themselves and label themselves a separate species (called "the government") who claim to have different properties than other human beings and different rights which contradict all logical reasoning.


Exactly. It seems so basic but many people who propose grand solutions have zero understanding about human beings and why that is so important to any social, economic or political planning.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 10 Feb 2010, 18:33:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pablonite', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'D')id you see how fertility rates have plummeted in third world countries in the presentation?
I got this "This video contains content from SnagFilms LLC, who has decided to block it. "


Arg, they blocked it. I'll re-upload it if possible.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron