Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Israel Thread pt 4 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Israel proposes work camps for illegal migrants

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 12:41:46

I thought that's what the West Bank was. 8O
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Israel proposes work camps for illegal migrants

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 12:50:24

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_made_ ... an_corpses

The Israeli's won't be turning anyone into soap. It's never been done in camps before and it won't in the future. It's a tale of silly folklore and exaggeration, like so many other tales of war throughout history.

And yes, the West Bank is already a self governing work camp.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

EU: Jerusalem should be capital of two states

Unread postby Bas » Tue 08 Dec 2009, 17:23:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')uropean Union ministers have called for Jerusalem to serve as the capital of both Israel and a future Palestinian state as part of a negotiated peace.
The foreign ministers dropped an earlier reference stating explicitly that East Jerusalem should be the capital of a Palestinian state.
Palestinians welcomed the statement. Israel said it contained "nothing new".
I liked this bit$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he EU will not recognise any changes to the pre-1967 borders including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties."
BBC news

Ofcourse America ruled by their AIPAC overlords will never allow a peace-treaty on this basis...
Last edited by Ferretlover on Tue 08 Dec 2009, 20:19:16, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Isreal Thread pt 3.
Bas
 

Re: EU: Jerusalem should be capital of two states

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Tue 08 Dec 2009, 18:22:11

And what happens to the Israeli settlements?

There are half a million Israelis living in Palestinian territory. Are they to be forcibly removed? Incorporated into Palestine?

Until the world has some kind of reasonable answer to that question, a two state solution will be impossible.

Image

As it stands, there isn't enough Palestine left to build a country.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: EU: Jerusalem should be capital of two states

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Tue 08 Dec 2009, 18:37:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s it stands, there isn't enough Palestine left to build a country.


Great point. I think your graphics are a little old though. They dismantled all of the Jewish settlements in Gaza a few years ago. And there's a lot more in W. Bank now.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: EU: Jerusalem should be capital of two states

Unread postby Bas » Tue 08 Dec 2009, 19:48:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'A')nd what happens to the Israeli settlements?
How could the statement be less clear?

All the settlements should be given up. Israel created them, so it's their problem how to deal with the settlers.
Bas
 

Re: THE Israel Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby hermit » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 15:40:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'B')est case scenario for a Middle East: a massive asteroid about to hit the Earth breaks apart over the Middle East and shatters into thousands of smaller pieces, and flattens the Middle East from Morocco to Pakistan.

Of course the survivors would probably continue the fight from the rubble.


Best case scenario for the Middle East: A massive asteroid flattens Washington DC, demolishing America's ability to use the ME for proxy wars, resource theft, and military stomping grounds.
User avatar
hermit
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 13 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Israel harvested organs in ’90s without consent

Unread postby crude_intentions » Mon 21 Dec 2009, 12:56:49

I'm going to stir up a fire, but this is starting to turn into a John Grisham novel. 8O

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Israel harvested organs in ’90s without consent
Military confirms informal practice, claims it ‘does not happen anymore’

JERUSALEM - Israel has admitted that in the 1990s, its forensic pathologists harvested organs from dead bodies, including Palestinians, without permission of their families.

The issue emerged with publication of an interview with the then-head of Israel's Abu Kabir forensic institute, Dr. Jehuda Hiss. The interview was conducted in 2000 by an American academic, who released it because of a huge controversy last summer over an allegation by a Swedish newspaper that Israel was killing Palestinians in order to harvest their organs. Israel hotly denied the charge.

Parts of the interview were broadcast on Israel's Channel 2 TV over the weekend. In it, Hiss said, "We started to harvest corneas ... Whatever was done was highly informal. No permission was asked from the family." Link


From August Top Sweden newspaper says IDF kills Palestinians for their organs
orginal article in swedish here you will need to use google translate to read it.

In July that weird corruption bust in New Jersy.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he case began with bank fraud charges against a member of an insular Syrian Jewish enclave centered in a seaside town. But when that man became a federal informant and posed as a crooked real estate developer offering cash bribes to obtain government approvals, it mushroomed into a political scandal that could rival any of the most explosive and sleazy episodes in New Jersey’s recent past.

it was replete with tales of the illegal sales of body parts; of furtive negotiations in diners, parking lots and boiler rooms; of nervous jokes about “patting down” a man who turned out to indeed be an informant; and, again and again, of the passing of cash — once in a box of Apple Jacks cereal stuffed with $97,000. link
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
- Albert Einstein
User avatar
crude_intentions
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: South Carolina
Top

Re: Israel harvested organs in ’90s without consent

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 21 Dec 2009, 13:02:44

Surprise, surprise, NOT! And yet again...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Friedrich Nietzsche', 'T')he man who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Israel prepares to strike Iran from Gulf and N. Iraq

Unread postby KevO » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 05:25:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')rab voices were fanning Middle East war fever Wednesday night, Feb. 3. DEBKAfile's military sources report that not only are Syrian leaders beating war drums - Syrian foreign minister Walid Muallem said in Damascus: "Israelis, do not test the power of Syria since you know the war will move into your cities" - but Egyptian military sources have put out information purporting to outline Israel's preparations to strike Iran.
They report that the Israeli Navy together with the US Fifth Fleet have for some weeks been charting Persian Gulf waters and Iranian shorelines in preparation for attacks by Israeli naval and special operations forces.
IDF intelligence and special forces officers, they also say, have been marking out routes for their air and ground forces to drive into Iran and hit its nuclear installations.
According to these Egyptian sources, Saudi Arabia has demanded clarifications from Washington about reported US-assisted Israeli preparations to strike Iran and asks why they were not brought to the notice of Riyadh and the Gulf Arab governments.
The Saudis added that several Gulf intelligence and naval units had tracked Israeli movements and gathered documentary evidence.
Some of this information was leaked in Cairo Wednesday night to Shorouk, a publication which Egyptian intelligence often uses as an outlet for information held to be credible.
Shorouk was first out with the story of the Israeli Air Force attack on Iranian arms convoys in Sudan in January 2009.

http://www.debka.com/article/8580/
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 04 Feb 2010, 11:13:36, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Current Events is for energy-related breaking news.
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA
Top

Re: Israel prepares to strike Iran from Gulf and N. Iraq

Unread postby EndOfGrowth » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 09:37:54

Related article--

US Sends Ships and Missiles to the Gulf, Raises Stakes On Iran


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ja ... siles-gulf

This could get interesting
Machines are what distinguish modern man from the savage.
User avatar
EndOfGrowth
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon 04 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: End of the plateau

Re: Israel prepares to strike Iran from Gulf and N. Iraq

Unread postby Roy » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 09:59:21

I've got a case of "Israel is REALLY going to attack Iran THIS TIME" fatigue.

Debka frequently posts articles that seem to center around scaring the Iranians and getting the Israeli people and their sympathizers worldwide to support what I think would be a very foolish move with disastrous consequences for the world economy, and the US in particular.

Part of me hopes that they don't do it... there is no need for so many more innocent people to perish.

Yet, a selfish part of me wants it to happen, so that the consequences for Americans will (hopefully) serve as a giant 2x4 to the head of the sleep walking American public. I'm prepared for that outcome or at least reasonably so, yet so many are not.

I've studied this issue in great detail from many different angles, yet every scenario I can imagine has a poor outcome for the US and possibly other oil importing countries.

I have yet to see any news presentation that talks about the possible consequences and the knock-on effects. Rather, the media presents the issue as imminent doom for Israel -- another holocaust-- without immediate action by the US and Israel to neuter the Iranian threat.

Iran doesn't have us surrounded. On the contrary, we have their country surrounded by powerful military forces in an offensive posture. Why wouldn't they be paranoid?

If there were a serious discussion of the potential consequences, including disruption of the oil markets and radioactive fallout drifting into neighboring countries, I think people would realize the folly of the 'attack Iran' strategy.

It's pretty obvious to me why the western media is only telling one side of the story. Reminiscent of the build up to our invasion of Iraq.

My 2¢
A nations military should only be used in a nations self defense, not to entertain liberal cravings for shaping poor nations into images of themselves by force. -- Eastbay

Shooting the messenger is typical when you are incapable of arguing against them. -- Airline Pilot
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck

Re: Israel prepares to strike Iran from Gulf and N. Iraq

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 10:13:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Iran doesn't have us surrounded. On the contrary, we have their country surrounded by powerful military forces in an offensive posture. Why wouldn't they be paranoid?


B.S. Iran has been given every opportunity to ratchet down tensions. There is no excuse for their behavior.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')If there were a serious discussion of the potential consequences, including disruption of the oil markets and radioactive fallout drifting into neighboring countries, I think people would realize the folly of the 'attack Iran' strategy.


So Iran with nukes is OK? I don't think you've thought this through at all. it's just "israel and the west = bad, anybody who opposes them = good".
mos6507
 
Top

Re: THE Israel Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby Roy » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 11:32:04

Mos I appreciate your input.

I knew my post would draw you out. LOL

Now to address your comments:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')oy wrote:
Iran doesn't have us surrounded. On the contrary, we have their country surrounded by powerful military forces in an offensive posture. Why wouldn't they be paranoid?


MOS wrote: B.S. Iran has been given every opportunity to ratchet down tensions. There is no excuse for their behavior.


What part of that particular statement is BS?

Have you looked at a map of the middle east lately and mentally noted where US forces are located in relation to Iran? Please do so before continuing this discussion with me because it seems you are not aware of the disposition and deployment of US military assets in that region.

Have you not heard the sabre rattling of America and Israel and the direct threats against Iranian sovereignty... IE calls in our media for regime change in Iran, and our active support of opposition groups in Iran?

If Iran were supporting the KKK, would you think that was ok? If they were calling for regime change in America, and putting their money where there mouths are, would that be ok too? After all what's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Or does that rule only apply when Israel and the US are not involved?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o Iran with nukes is OK? I don't think you've thought this through at all. it's just "israel and the west = bad, anybody who opposes them = good".


Iran with a few nukes is a threat to anyone who would attack them. A first strike on Israel would be national suicide for them. Israel has between 200 and 300 nuclear weapons, submarines capable of launching nuclear tipped missiles, and a very capable and advanced air force. In other words, they have multiple and redundant methods to accurately deliver nuclear weapons to Iran.

An Iranian first strike would make them into an even bigger pariah than they already are and it is difficult to imagine any nation opposing a punitive retaliation to such an attack. Recall the world's support of the US invasion of Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks. And that was small potatoes compared to the scenarios described in our media of a hypothetical Iranian nuclear first strike on Israel.

And finally, to analyze your comment... What I think is that you are dealing with some serious cognitive dissonance.

First of all, since you have been here a while, I can safely presume that you understand how the US economy functions and what the petro-dollar system is.

You must also understand that our current paradigm is unsustainable. You say as much in your more well thought out posts, of which there are many on this site. (that's a compliment to your eloquence and your intellect friend).

Yet you have this emotional attachment to Israel that seems to over ride your understanding of those issues. I have no emotional attachment to any foreign country or the current government of the US.

With emotional issues like this, it's easy to label someone who presents unpleasant facts as someone who 'hates that which you love'.

Maybe I can be more objective, and see this as a conflict between two sets of ideologies, and I can look at a map and determine which side is actively threatening the other without any bias or pre-conceived notions of who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. I don't see things in that melodramatic light.

Also, I think you may be projecting a bit. After all, according to our media, anyone who opposes American hegemony is the "Axis of Evil" and a threat to our non-negotiable way of life: Chavez, Iran, NK, and formerly Saddam Hussein.

I don't hate Israel or Jews, nor do I hate Iranians or Muslims. To me this is a struggle of resource importing countries against countries that posses those resources but are unwilling to 'play ball' with the west's ideas of how things should run-- ie letting multinational corporations harvest the resources of poor countries at maximum profit for said corporations and minimal profit for the regimes and people of those countries.
A nations military should only be used in a nations self defense, not to entertain liberal cravings for shaping poor nations into images of themselves by force. -- Eastbay

Shooting the messenger is typical when you are incapable of arguing against them. -- Airline Pilot
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck
Top

Re: THE Israel Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 12:05:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Have you looked at a map of the middle east lately and mentally noted where US forces are located in relation to Iran?


Iran has not said "we are building nuclear weapons because we feel surrounded". If it did, maybe I'd have more respect for them. it's NK and Venezuela that play the "we feel threatened" card, which is also bogus, but is a little more honorable a tactic.

But no, Iran has hidden behind lies and subterfuge, like the secret facility that was just uncovered.

Obama went on a "mea culpa" tour of the middle-east to try to throw out the olive branch. But Iran would not seize the moment because they were too stuck in their GW Bush axis-of-evil mindset. They are like a jilted lover who can't let go of a grudge.

You don't understand that Iran NEEDS the US as the Great Satan(TM) to pacify its public, and even that is wearing thin (as the election crisis shows).

The actual threat by the US (or Israel) to an Iran that is not acting hawkish is minimal.

Iran has had 30+ years since the Shah was kicked out and it has suffered more casualties from its Muslim neighbor of Iraq than Israel or the US.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Have you not heard the sabre rattling of America and Israel and the direct threats against Iranian sovereignty... IE calls in our media for regime change in Iran, and our active support of opposition groups in Iran?


I sense no sabre rattling from official government circles, no. I do see a lot of sabre rattling on the part of Iran. Should the US strike Iran because it feels threatened by the Iranians constant chantings of "death to america"? You are calling for selective restraint.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')If Iran were supporting the KKK, would you think that was ok?


They are already supporting Hezbollah. That's bad enough.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Iran with a few nukes is a threat to anyone who would attack them.


Translation: The NPT treaty should be selectively ignored whether we can tolerate one country going nuclear over another.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')First of all, since you have been here a while, I can safely presume that you understand how the US economy functions and what the petro-dollar system is.


Your problem is you see all US foreign policy in the middle east revolving around resource grabs and preparations for resource grabs. And so in opposition to that, you wrap your arms around rogue states that do not deserve such coddling.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Yet you have this emotional attachment to Israel that seems to over ride your understanding of those issues.


The overarching rule I go by is to reject the idea of "the devil made me do it". Your argument merely amounts to "Hey, let Iran build nukes and potentially set off WWIII. Whatever happens, it's the US and Israel's fault". This blame game and lack of balanced sense of responsibility is what I reject.

G W Bush has been out of office for over a year now. Obama, from the very start, has tried to forge a new dialogue with Iran. Every single inflection point in the post-Bush era has been MISPLAYED by Iran. They have done nothing but establish themselves as corrupt manipulators with dangerous ulterior motives. They have steadily eroded their international support. And despite all this, all you can do is give them free pass after free pass. I don't give a crap where the US troops are. The US troops have been somewhere in the middle east for many decades now. There is no excuse for Iranian actions.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
') I have no emotional attachment to any foreign country or the current government of the US.


No, it's the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Also, I think you may be projecting a bit. After all, according to our media, anyone who opposes American hegemony is the "Axis of Evil" and a threat to our non-negotiable way of life: Chavez, Iran, NK, and formerly Saddam Hussein.


You are still stuck in a G W Bush neocon timewarp.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')To me this is a struggle of resource importing countries against countries that posses those resources but are unwilling to 'play ball' with the west's ideas of how things should run-- ie letting multinational corporations harvest the resources of poor countries at maximum profit for said corporations and minimal profit for the regimes and people of those countries.

Regardless of what happened with G W Bush in Iraq, I don't think there is any evidence that the Obama administration intends to do an oil-grab of Iran. And no, I won't be moved by a bunch of Alex Jones hyperlinks. In fact, I think he's bending over backwards NOT to strike Iran because he knows we are militarily and financially overextended.

Sending ships to the gulf and arming our allies with patriot missiles is also a sign of weakness, that we are playing defense rather than offense.

It is this weakness on the part of the US that is emboldening Iran to go the distance with its nuclear program, which will force Israel's hand in the end.

As bad as resource wars may be, touching off WWIII is even worse, which I would hold Iran primarily responsible for.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: THE Israel Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby gollum » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 14:24:57

Israel or Iran, Muslim or jew- Both sides have been so aggressive the past fifty years I think maybe they need to blow the hell out of each other and get it out of their system. I just don't want the USA involved on either side.
gollum
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Wyoming

Re: Israel prepares to strike Iran from Gulf and N. Iraq

Unread postby gollum » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 14:38:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')If there were a serious discussion of the potential consequences, including disruption of the oil markets and radioactive fallout drifting into neighboring countries, I think people would realize the folly of the 'attack Iran' strategy.


So Iran with nukes is OK? I don't think you've thought this through at all. it's just "israel and the west = bad, anybody who opposes them = good".[/quote]

Yes, to me an Iran with nukes is ok. It may very well be in Israels interest to go to war to keep Iran from going nuclear, and I dont begrudge them that if they so choose. That said it is not in our interest, a nuclear iran, even an Iran with a dozen bombs is not a threat to the USA....

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... _graph.png
gollum
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Wyoming
Top

Israel's Recent Assassination In Dubai

Unread postby mattduke » Sun 21 Feb 2010, 23:07:19

They conspired to kill him in his hotel room. They used fake British, German, French, and Irish passports. They made it look like natural causes. They left a do not disturb sign on the door.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 034933.ece
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Israel's Recent Assassination In Dubai

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 21 Feb 2010, 23:32:27

Cry me a river.
mos6507
 

Re: Israel's Recent Assassination In Dubai

Unread postby lowem » Mon 22 Feb 2010, 01:18:56

The plot sounds very Jason Bourne-ish.
Except Bourne would have done it alone.
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron