Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 21:16:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', 'O')ne you "band" up and manage to keep the warlords away, I suspect there will be a certain temptation to become warlords yourselves. I will bet that a few years of hard life marked by constant toil, disappointments, deaths, etc, will make modern day ethics go out of the window.
I don't know that you need "modern day ethics." The old band system of "give support, get support" is sufficient. One certainly hopes folks can come up with ways of life which avoid "constant toil." I haven't managed to get through life without disappointments and deaths, so I don't think that plays into it at all. Disappointments and deaths are features of life. If you yourself have managed to avoid them I can only assume you are either extremely young or extremely lucky!
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 21:19:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m wondering how that psycho rules without help from a lot of other psychos.
Here is one way it was done.

Image

Here is another way it's been done at a lower level.
mos6507
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 21:21:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m wondering how that psycho rules without help from a lot of other psychos.
Here is one way it was done.
Hitler rose to power via the state, not as a warlord taking over from anarchy. He was legitimized by the state.

I got the impression you all were talking about warlords arising from anarchy, not warlords arising via the "lawful" state.

So I guess I'm just confused about what's being discussed. No big surprise there.
Ludi
 

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 21:37:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', 'F')eel proud in your role as a "bandit"* contributing to reducing the carrying capacity of the land and increasing the chances of a catastrophic collapse into dieoff.
Please describe how you are contributing to increasing the carrying capacity of the land and how you are increasing the chances of avoiding a catastrophic collapse. From what you said, you're actually not DOING anything, you're just theorizing. Nor have you indicated you have any interest in actually DOING anything, since you're "not an activist."
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 22:03:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'H')ere is one way it was done. Here is another way it's been done at a lower level.
Hitler had plenty of help, Mos. Bad example.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 22:12:26

LH labelled me a 'bandit' as a non supporter of his totallitarianist regime. "Those who are not with us are gainst us" is the core of his argument here.
His next response to me on the Medina system "How would those outside the walls be prevented from forming against the city?" Is no less valid now than it would be in a post collapse Medina style system.
My reading of the history of Medina is that there were extremely few crimes committed inside the walled city for the following reasons: 1/ The Law of the city was very clearly explained to all entering. 2/ Punshments were extremely harsh (cutting off limbs/ execution) 3/ The Law had consensus support, therefore all citizens would not hesitate to report a crime. 4/ The city was a kinder place to be than the wilderness, visitors would not want to lose their right to visit and trade, take refuge etc.

As far as the actual accomplishments required for 'power down' I don't believe any kind of Statist totalitarianism will cut it. There is massive inefficiency in our current systems, this should be the 1st measure taken by any realistic government; cutting out obvious and blatent inefficiency. In conjuction a massive education campaign on the reality of resource constraints would start the waking up process necessary for broad support of the necessary privations.

If civilisation is to prevail beyond peak oil etc. It must do so by being simply appealing to the ordinary person, by being 'nice'. Any attempt at setting up a 'sousveillance' state is bound to fail because of the natural resistance and distrust of such powers. The idea is fundamentally ugly, therefore will fail from within if not by attack from outside.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby pablonite » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 22:45:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '&')quot;Thanks for the waste of time, your a tool." - pablonite
:)
It was derogatory I admit, the enviromental forum does that to me, it was also meant as something useful to TPTB - the injection of global warming art into global warming science. Gives the religion of climate change some more heart.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy ', 'A')s far as the actual accomplishments required for 'power down' I don't believe any kind of Statist totalitarianism will cut it. There is massive inefficiency in our current systems, this should be the 1st measure taken by any realistic government; cutting out obvious and blatent inefficiency. In conjuction a massive education campaign on the reality of resource constraints would start the waking up process necessary for broad support of the necessary privations.


I have a problem with this idea of imminent or near future power down being "inefficient" seeing as how we might only be at peak oil. There is all the time in the world to power down when you control the resources in question. The question is who is going to go first and how fast. People orbiting your world in private jets want you to go second right after the third world and probably have zero intention of powering down in their own lifetimes.

There is quite a bit being done IMO. We have control of the food supply, military, government, and most "services" critical to life being passed into the hands of fewer and fewer people. History has nothing comforting to offer us except that although statism, totalitarianism or and other ism may not cut it, they sure will try. The preparations are obvious, your prediction of the 'sousveillance' state going down quickly will be interesting to watch but don't hold your breath, it's still got plenty of juice as far as our own puny lifetimes are concerned.
User avatar
pablonite
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 00:31:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'A') bunch of individuals acting independently is not a "system" so you can't actually have an "anarchic system with no rule of law." Such a thing simply can't and doesn't exist, as far as I can tell. You can't call it a "system," certainly.
It is quite possible for a system to be in a chaotic state. For instance, the "climate system" today is in a steady state (just about). But further warming could destabilize and send it into a "chaotic state" of wild and unpredictable behavior, before it stabilized at a new, hothouse equilibrium. But it will remain a "climate system" throughout.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'D')isappointments and deaths are features of life. If you yourself have managed to avoid them I can only assume you are either extremely young or extremely lucky!

In modern industrial nations, by far the majority of people die in their 70's+, and their passing is not that sad because it is expected and considered part of the natural life cycle. But if death begins to creep into and become universalized across all age groups, especially considering that modern man is used to an entirely different experience, I suspect you won't be able to shrug it off in this way in longer.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'P')lease describe how you are contributing to increasing the carrying capacity of the land and how you are increasing the chances of avoiding a catastrophic collapse.

I have no obligation to answer this question*. We are not discussing personalities, we are discussing Green Communism.

* That said, one example is that I have publicized resource depletion and climate change issues on a blog that receives 200 visitors daily. That is at least as powerful a contribution as that of a typical Greenpeace or Green Party activist (not to mention peakoil.com member).
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'L')H labelled me a 'bandit' as a non supporter of his totallitarianist regime. "Those who are not with us are gainst us" is the core of his argument here.

Just preparing you for the inevitable. :wink: I'm not enthusiastic about it, I just see the "sousveillance state" as the least of possible evils, since I do not think anyone else has workable alternatives that could keep society together on the downslope without resorting to coercive politics.

Your Medina system does not address the fundamental flaw, in that it is not global, whereas 1) the resource depletion and pollution issues *are* global, and 2) political formations - not burdened by the task of transition to sustainability - outside will form an irresistibly attraction to your own people.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 00:55:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'H')ere is one way it was done. ... Here is another way it's been done at a lower level.
so have you read this book Mos?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 01:02:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', ' ')Your inability to read carefully or use your browser's search function is not my problem.
Sorry, are you seriously suggesting that you answered this question or that this theme had been discussed previously? By you?
If you dont know the what the difference is, which is my guess, you are more than welcomed to state so.

Till then, I will repeat the question: Last_Historian, whats the difference between Green Communism and Green Fascism?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 02:06:05

@Ludi,$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')lease describe how you are contributing to increasing the carrying capacity of the land and how you are increasing the chances of avoiding a catastrophic collapse.
Actually I wrongly took the bait, so I retract my answer in favor of the following:

In reality, the people who now do most to raise the Earth's carrying capacity are in fact oil and fertilizer companies. As you well know, however, this carrying capacity is "phantom" (to use Catton's expression). Ironically, it is those same people who contribute the most to increasing the chances of catastrophic collapse by taking us into way into overshoot.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'W')hat jobs (real work) have you done in your life?
As I already mentioned, this has precisely nothing to do with Green Communism. Shouting is not going to convince me to answer irrelevant questions.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'T')ill then, I will repeat the question: Last_Historian, whats the difference between Green Communism and Green Fascism?
Here you go:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Back on page 6, I', 'O')ff the top of my head, Green Communism is socially progressive and does not exalt militarism or nationalism or the cult of a Great Leader, and its economic structure is not based on corporatism.

Text deleted-FL It appears your questions about fascism are redundant, since you presumably know all there is about it. I will feel free to ignore you in the future.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Last_Historian » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 06:06:41

@Pretorian,

Our discussion is neither productive nor enjoyable (to me anyway), nor is it of any use to other forum members. I see no point in continuing it, and will not be doing so.
my Sublime Oblivion blog on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil.
You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them. - Chateaubriand.
User avatar
Last_Historian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:01:14

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:27:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')I got the impression you all were talking about warlords arising from anarchy, not warlords arising via the "lawful" state.


Power abhors a vacuum. You just said in another post that true anarchy probably never actually exists. Since many people equate the direction the US is going to that of the Weimar Republic, I think the Hitler analogy is apt. We may go straight from where we are now to fascism. Certainly that is a recurring meme (pretty much the entire schtick of Alex Jones, Amy Goodman, etc...).

You seem to push a kind of Anne Frank thesis in these sorts of threads, that people are fundamentally good. Zombie hordes therefore can't happen, or at least they can't happen in your neck of the woods because you get along with your neighbors. Of course, everyone's belly is still full. You can't expect the future to be the same as the present.

I am just saying that ordinary people can very well commit acts of atrocity in the name of following the crazy 2% being discussed, whether it's at the small level of gangs or the national level. All you need is the right set of ingredients.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'Y')ou seem to push a kind of Anne Frank thesis in these sorts of threads, that people are fundamentally good.
I don't know if people are "fundamentally good." I certainly don't think they're "fundamentally bad."

People are fundamentally self-involved. Thanks for clarifying about the HItler= warlords thingy.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:35:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', 'A')s I already mentioned, this has precisely nothing to do with Green Communism. Shouting is not going to convince me to answer irrelevant questions.
It has everything to do with it. My suspicion was that you know nothing about how the world and people exist in reality. Ad hom deleted.

You have to establish authority in any debate, especially to convince people that you know how the world should work. Not having any experience outside books, you have no authority at all. You're a cheeky bastard to proffer how 7 billion people should live their lives.

This has ceased to be a serious discussion and is looks more like a child picking shapes out of the clouds. b]What communist countries have you visited from where you draw your experience for this discussion?[/b]
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 03 Feb 2010, 11:49:03, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Ad hom deleted per COC 2.1.4.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:38:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', ' ')Zombie hordes therefore can't happen, or at least they can't happen in your neck of the woods because you get along with your neighbors. Of course, everyone's belly is still full. You can't expect the future to be the same as the present.



I don't, but I don't expect my neighbors to suddenly become vicious killers just because we're all hungry. I don't think I've EVER claimed "Zombie hordes can't happen." Just that I don't personally believe in them or find them likely. I try to weigh the likelihood of events. Zombie hordes is way way way down my list of concerns. I EXPECT to be quite dead by the time any Zombies appear on the scene. :) And if they do show up while I'm alive, I still have my Zombie Escape Plan ("run away").
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:52:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')I don't, but I don't expect my neighbors to suddenly become vicious killers just because we're all hungry.


First of all, it wouldn't be "sudden". Second of all, how do you expect your neighbors to react when they get hungry? And how effective do you think their late adaptations are going to be? Lastly, while you may vouch for your neighbors, what about your neighbors' neighbors, and so on? The zombies don't necessarily have to be your immediate neighbors. While mobility will be hampered post-peak, it won't be completely unavailable. And lastly, even if you are in a better strategic position, whether or not you face zombies doesn't mean other people in other regions won't. We're speaking in broad terms here.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Zombie hordes is way way way down my list of concerns.


Maybe it's way down your list of concerns, but maybe it should be high on the list of, let's say, an inner city new yorker's concerns. This is why topics about picking locations are perennial here. The severity of collapse is likely to vary considerably depending on region.

As futile as it may be, Last Historian is trying to "solve" the problem of overshoot--for everyone. Just because you, I, or others here believe we've found the safest possible spot to ride out the storm doesn't mean there won't be hotspots of violent atrocities. YMMV.
Last edited by mos6507 on Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:54:06, edited 1 time in total.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:53:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', ' ')I do not think anyone else has workable alternatives that could keep society together on the downslope without resorting to coercive politics.
You've looked at all the other plans people have offered here over the years?

Can you list some of them and their failings? Thanks.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:54:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'M')aybe it's way down your list of concerns, but maybe it should be high on the list of, let's say, an inner city new yorker's concerns.
That's fine. She can worry about it. But you seem to think I should worry about it for her?

Personally I think there is no shortage of people on the Zombie Horde bandwagon here at po.com.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Politics: We need to embrace Green Communism

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Fri 29 Jan 2010, 10:58:47

Cities will exhibit Zombie Hordes first. Takes a crowd. 8) Rural troops will be sent in to stifle.

Stoneleigh: The headlines will get much worse from here. Negative t-bill rates are coming in a much bigger way, but always less negative than would yield a low real rate of interest, so the liquidity trap persists. Negative t-bill rates will make cash on hand look better than bonds, even of the shortest duration, as cash won't have a built in depreciation. T-bills will still be a good deal relative to most things, but cash on hand will be better. That will increase the likelihood of cash withdrawals leading to bank runs.
Welcome to the perfect financial storm

And per Ludi's post. Why do you want to 'keep society together'. When society only helps the Top 50,000 Households? 91 Million Americans are at or near the already 'low balled' poverty line.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'P')ersonally I think there is no shortage of people on the Zombie Horde bandwagon here at po.com.
:twisted: :twisted: 8O 8O
Hey, Zombie!! Throw me some beads and dubloons :!: :!: Mardi Gras :!: :!: :!:
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests