by Carlhole » Sat 24 Oct 2009, 10:40:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Last_Historian', '@')pstarr,
I still think it's easier to define what I am not, which is a moderate. Of course I hope for, and think that if the right steps are taken, the cornucopian outcome is possible; on the other hand collapse is far more realistic due to political and social reasons. Perhaps I'm something like a... singularitarian doomer?
@essex,
I agree, but it's still the renewable source with the best long-term prospects. Short of a massive retooling of world industrial capacity to build wind turbines, though, it will not make a significant impact quickly enough.
Ha! You're the only other Singularitarian on this board! I'm the other one. You're in the midst of a bunch of technology-hating Luddites, my friend. The Doomers around want the Stone Age and they WANT IT NOW, DAMMIT!
I don't believe you can reliably predict the future out more than a few years. I don't believe (as many do around here) that all the most important scientific discoveries have already been made. Science underlying the The Universe if still poorly understood. Game-changers are completely possible. So I avidly follow CERN and the National Ignition Facility and the various approaches to fusion and so forth.
As for the Singularity stuff, personally I'm absolutely gobsmacked by the
Blue Brain Project, for example. But only a few around here are interested in such things.
Welcome, and don't be afraid talk about whatever the hell you feel like talking about.