Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

As Rome Burns....

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 21 Oct 2009, 12:44:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'A')bout half of the eligible Americans voted during the last presidential election. Those who bothered to vote had a fuzzy choice between choosing more war or ... more war. They selected .... surprise!: more war.


Then why are you complaining? That's democracy for you. Don't be a sore loser.


My morning coffee has worn off by now. Was that irony?
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby eastbay » Wed 21 Oct 2009, 12:50:58

Actually what the USA has is a Johnson/Nixon style body count now accumulating. It's the most interesting type of all. It features millions of people getting killed to accomplish absolutely nothing whatsoever.

And Rangerone, I agree with you on one point: I don't particularly care for the new communists. They prance around displaying their 'Che' symbols and have usurped the name 'communist' and twisted it into a culturally destructive ideology devoid of common sense and hope.

The path of progress forged by the USSR was lost sometime during the 70's. Their party leaders too started fiddling. Just like ours are now.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby dorlomin » Wed 21 Oct 2009, 18:04:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'A')fghanistan is the premier signal that the empire is cracking. It was among the British empire's final gasps of imperialism, it marked the final breath of the USSR, and future history books may very well mark this disaster as the end of the American Empire too.

Much like fiddling during the inferno, the American public is strangely silent on this and other deadly US military transgressions worldwide. In fact, the American public demanded by a greater than 98% margin the pouring of more gas on the Afghanistan inferno while 'fiddling' mindlessly with pro sports, pop music, and screaming about relatively irrelevant minor social issues.

Afghanistan is the sign that the USA is dying. This should be clear to all.
I disagree, actualy I disagree quite strongly. Defeat in a asymetric war is not a good sign of strength. The US was defeated in Vietnam yet went on to have near 30 year streak in growth of dominance that seen its major rival totally collapse. It is not millitary strength but political failure that is killing the US in Afghanistan.

The UK analogy is also a bit weak, the UK never really tried to rule Afhanistan directly but used it as a buffer state between India and Russia. The two major Anglo Afghan wars, both of which the UK achieved its goals.

The British empire died from two causes one was the rise of compatative industrial economies that caught up with the indistrial revolution and reduced the UKs industrial advantage. The second was the arrival of nationalism too the educated classes. The growth of nationalism from its nacsent forms (such as the declaration of Arbroath) through to the post Treaty of Westphalia world and finaly into Wilsonian self determination is a long and windy one, but this spread of nationalism had a long history in Ireland and had finaly reached the Indian middle classes around the time of the Armistar massicare. This lead to widespread civil dissobediance and open revolt that made colonial possesions ungovernable, or at least uneconomic to govern.

Offcourse the rise of two world powers who had their own agendas and reasons to support anti colonial forces (the US and the USSR) also had a huge impact, especialy in Africa (the breaking of the imperial prefference trade block for example made governing Africa uneconomical).

The US has much less of a formal empire and is largely an 'empire' of willing treaties and mutually beneficial trade agreements. Nations it has conquered have gone on to stellar perfromances in economic and social development such as Germany and Japan. That is not to whitewash the occasional brutality excesized by proxies to keep nations within the US sphere of influence (such as Honduras, El Salvador, Chile).

The US is nothing like the UK in either 1909 or 1946. There is no similarity I can see between the positions (other than being indebt in 46 but even then China is hardly to the US what the US was to the UK in 46).

I feel that the whole end of empire thing is very over done and mistakes a clawing back of America to still be the worlds only super power, but not quite as far ahead as it was for a complete loss of 'empire'.

The US is redrawing the 'limes' a la Hadrian, but its soldiers sit on top of Kurdish and Saudi oil fields, not Chinas. Its fleets are real and built not Russias, it has more land than people, more water than mouths and is for the moment the worlds science heavy weight. It can afford to lose in Afghanistan and still dominate the world.

Controversialy I think that peak oil and cliamte change will strengthen Americas power.

Rome did not die with Teutoburgwald, nor Britain with Ishandwala.

Its an opinion anyway.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'T')he path of progress forged by the USSR was lost sometime during the 70's. Their party leaders too started fiddling. Just like ours are now.


Actualy the USSR went of the rails when it addopted state capitalism and started waffling about socialism in one country. The whole point of Marxism was worker ownership of the means of production not the state. Were I comunist orientated I would strongly favour anarcho-syndicalism. Perhaps its the romantic inspired by Homage to Catalonia in me. :)
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby dinopello » Wed 21 Oct 2009, 21:51:39

America dominates in large part because we KICK-ASS at consumption ! Isn't that weird ? Does anyone disagree?
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby eastbay » Thu 22 Oct 2009, 02:38:55

dorlomin, I said it was a 'signal' foretelling a coming collapse much like a 'tell-tale sign of trouble on the horizon', not a 'cause'. I suppose I could have been clearer.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: As Rome Burns....

Unread postby rangerone314 » Thu 22 Oct 2009, 09:48:16

The Athenian defeat in the campaign at Syracuse in 413 BC didn't signal the collapse of the Athenian empire (which does share a lot in common with the American one). I'd say it was a pretty good warning sign that they were overextending themselves. (They had a far flung economic empire with many client city-states, obligations, and resentful would-be enemies)

The Peloponnesian War went on until 404 BC. The great Athenian empire was dismantled, they lost their foreign possessions. Only the fact that the Spartans were more honorable and merciful than Athen's other enemies (Corinth and Thebers) prevented the destruction of Athens itself and the enslavement of its people.

Athens was singularly powerful in Greece, like the US is singularly powerful in the world. We should be more mindful than the Athenians were to the fact that a pack of wolves can bring down a much larger bear.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron