by americandream » Mon 12 Oct 2009, 23:27:19
Utter nonsense. Whose going to tell the Chinese or Indians to use their SUV's or sports hatch's less frequently? The same ads that implore us on the one hand to save the planet and in the next, to buy super cars with sex appeal?
The capitalist is not willingly going to sacrifiie his profit margins to save the planet or its scarce resources. Most of my business clients are like you..sceptical to the hilt, aggressively so in fact. They have a good reason. They know that any regulation of the market will hit their bottom line. Any they own the lobbyists, politicians and media all over this world.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', ' ')For BAU to continue we don't need to power the planet at current rates; we need an ever increasing supply of power.
Not on a per capita basis we don't. And we certainly can change the amount per capita as we've already demonstated back in the 80's.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')Right now 90%+ of Chinese and Indians do not own a car. They are very busily building them to run on OIL. The entire system is built on growth of oil supply not stability. Even if your wildly optimistic assertion was true we are still in deep shite as stable oil equals flatlining production.
Then each car will have to use less. Thats hybrids, and they've been mainstream for a decade now. Next up? PHEV's and EV's. Just because things are the way they are TODAY doesn't mean they have to be that way TOMORROW. What is it about perfectly obvious change which irritates Peakers so much? There used to be more electrics on the road in the US than ICE powered ones....gasoline only won because it was CHEAP. Maybe random wasteful transport won't be as cheap as it was in the past, it certainly isn't going away just because crude CONTINUES ( its been ongoing since 1969 or so, lets not forget! ) to become gradually more expensive.