by Sixstrings » Sun 04 Oct 2009, 09:52:58
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'D')oes anyone else think this is likely or significant?
I've come to the conclusion lately that we simply have too many people on the planet.
I was watching history channel the other day, some documentary about the bubonic plague (the first round of plagues in the dark ages). While tragic, the interesting thing is that the lives of so many people vastly improved AFTER the die-off. Pre-plague, most Italians were peasants who lived off a limited and meager diet. Post-plague, there was lots of empty land and housing to be had. The peasants moved off the manors and into their own homesteads.. they began growing a wide variety of produce. Their health improved, wages rose across the board -- the only ones who didn't like it were the elite, who had to work their fields by their own hand for once.
So as I was watching this, it just really sank in that in today's world our problem is overpopulation. Contrary to trickle-down Reaganomics, there really IS a finite amount of pie to go around. We've only had it as good as we have for so long because of trade barriers.. now that we have wide open globalization, the great masses of the world's peasants want a slice of our pie. When you do the numbers, when you average things out, there can be no other end result than a collapse of living standards in the west.
Except for the elite.. they will continue to skim from this great wealth transfer, and only get richer. The points I've made here are all academic.. there are really no solutions, most 1st worlders are just destined for 3rd world living.
SeaGypsy, how is that Australian wages are holding up so well even though that nation is essentially squarely in the Asian bloc? I suppose it's because you have raw goods China needs so they have no choice other than pay your prices? And I also assume you have tight controls on immigration?