by ohanian » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 21:55:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'T')he superorganism is best represented by the govt, because it is the govt of the society that uses force to make sure that the individuals in that society adhere to it's memes. You may view the govt as beneficial, but I assure you those who have not had the happy experiences that you have had do not.
My main point is simply that societies in the form of superorganisms compete for survival, and that forces that fight for the superorganisms survival trump those which fight for that of the individual. In the case of PO, I think you can be sure that most of the decsions that will be made in the next 2 decades will NOT be in your best interests.
All society is based on deception.
That is, the proper function of all
society is based on the delibrate deceptions perpetrated on all the
individuals that the society is consists of. However it is not individuals
in that society deceiving other individuals of the society. Rather it is
the complex phenomenal called "society" perpetrating the deception on the
individuals of the society.
A simple illustration will make the point clearer. Imagine if you will that
a human being is like a cell in a human body. In this case, the "society"
would be like the whole human body. The deception is this: The cells in the
human body is being deceived that the whole human body is looking after its
interest. If the whole human body is caught in a bind, it would delibrately
sacrifice a part of the body to save the whole. The cells in the part of the
body being sacrificed would not even know that they are being sacrificied.
This is the same for humans, the role of "society" is to protect itself and
if it has to, it will gladly sacrifice it own members to do so. Hence, the
creation of ruses and structural excuses to facilitate the mechanism.
One obvious way is through religion. A highly efficient technique to motivate
humans to risks their lives for the benefit of "society" or the "religion".
These individuals will have their lives extinguish for the benefit of others.
To make such unpalatable dish palatable, certain sauces were used, things like
the "afterlife", "heaven" , "glory" ,"honor" is nothing but sauces invented
by humans using the tool called "language" to serve the dish to the unthinking
masses. In the end, it is a human being's quality of life that counts.
===========================================================================
I'll take up your challenge.
In article <pan.2004.03.31.18.27.13.604319@home.fr>, jafar wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:00:52 +0000, drnobody wrote:
>
> I wouldn't let this obvious troll get you down. The Islamic world has
> denounced terrorism and tried to explain that terrorism is not part of
> Islamic doctrine time and time again but hardly anyone hears about it
> because it's drowned out by the more "newsworthy" "islamic" terrorist
> stories.
> As a Muslim and an Australian born and bred in Perth to a family with many
> generations in Australia I can assure you that no Muslim can claim to own
> anything. Not land, not a car, not a potted plant. Nothing.
I'm not sure what you meant by muslims claims to not own anything. Does that
mean anyone can take anything of the muslim? After all you claimed that
nothing belongs to the muslim.
Yet practical muslim will take steps to recover their possessions if they
are stolen. If "your" bicycle is stolen, do you not report it to the police
and if you see "your" bicycle dumped by the side of the road, do you not
claim it back.
So what exactly do you mean when you say "no Muslim can claim to own
anything."
I find this hypocrisy stupid. If you say "muslim claims to own nothing"
and yet you behave as if you do own things.
> Everything was created by and belongs to God. Those who through their
> greed for this worldly life, commit terrorist murder to further their own
> agenda are destined for hellfire.
Says who? Let me guess. There is a book called the Koran and inside the
book it says "Allah owns everything."
My question to you then is this: "Why do you take that book seriously and
yet you choose not to take another book seriously." Is it because that
you are brought up that way?
In this world that we live in, there are lots of humans. Human, being
devious, came up with a wonderful excuse to do questionable things. First
they invent a fake entity called god.
Next when they want to do things to other humans that are distasteful,
they say "Allah commands it.".
By the use of this ruse, they can justify doing things that are distasteful
since they are "merely following orders of their commander in chief".
The guilt factor is gone.
Now, when other humans are angry with what they had done, they merely
point to a book and say "This holy book is given to us by our holy prophet
and in that book contains the holy word of Allah."
The fake entity Allah is now blamed for the questionable things done
by other humans. It's all about the transfer of responsibility from
humans to a fake entity called "Allah".
Now, you say "Everything belongs to Allah". But so what? Allah never
manifest himself on earth (or in this universe). Everything that happen
is happening because of some agenda of some human beings. So what if
Allah owns everything since he never make use of them. Humans using
Allah as an excuse to commit questionable acts in this world. Allah
owns everything. I'm a follower of Allah thus I can use whatever is
owned by Allah to further the "cause of Allah". See. Just another excuse.
The "cause of Allah" is an excuse for humans to assert their dominance
over other human beings.
Everything belongs to Allah. So everything on Mars belongs to Allah.
Has Allah done anything to anything on the planet Mars? No. Because
Allah is merely an invention of man to deceive other man (just like
the fake entity jehovah).
> Killing of women, children, innocents and destruction of property are all
> outlawed in Islam, even in outright war. Those that do so such as aircraft
> hijackers and suicide bombers have left th fold of Islam and turned to the
> worship of satan the outcast.
>
So nicely put. But killing is not outlawed in Islam. So the koran can be
abused by human beings to push forward their own agenda. All the "evil"
humans have to do is to reinterpret the koran so make themselves the
rightful advocate of Islam and their enemies the ones who fails to
follow the "correct" interpretation of Islam.
See. Instantanous I'm the good guy and you are the bad guy. So using
Islam as their excuse they can "justify" their questionable actions
over other human beings.
Get it into your head. Allah is a tool used by humans to perform
the role of a leader to give instructions to them so that they can
do questionable things to other humans.
At the end of the day, it's what happens to human beings that matters
in this world. Words, speeches, books, slogans are all excuses.
> A'uzu billaahi minash shaytaani rajeem. (I seek refuge in Allah from satan
> the rejected)
>
Funny thing Satan, another invention of human beings. Like God, satan is
invented to take responsibility away from human being.