Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby Revi » Mon 28 Sep 2009, 08:16:27

Matt Simmons has made the mistake of telling us how much is left, then extrapolating that into a prediction on how it is going to be used. There are economic brakes that have been applied that slowed our use of oil lately. It's a kind of rationing. Give the consumers less paper to buy the stuff, and they will use less of it. The supply is still dwindling, but we are slowing down our use of it.

That's a good thing. We're using less oil.

The amount under Saudi Arabia is still going down, just slower now.

Matt Simmons should stick to making predictions about what he knows. The supply is different from the finished product.

As an example there was a lot of salmon on grocery store shelves in the 1960's just after they punched through the ice and got the breeders up near Greenland. The supply was down, but the stores were full of finished product.

We may be in a similar situation now with oil.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Mon 28 Sep 2009, 10:17:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')Simmons, M., Twilight in the Desert (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005 ), p.354:

"The twilight of Saudi Arabia's oil miracle, if properly understood and managed, could become the dawn of a more enlightened and sustainable global society....it could unleash the dawning of a genuine scientific investigation as the world's brightest minds tackle the challenges of inventing a series of new energy forms that create even greater security and prosperity for the evoling societies of our new century than we enjoyed through the bounty of affordable and dependable oil."

Emphasis mine.

Good work -sense. Impressive bit of research there.


Its called reading. Try it sometime. You learn things, like how many of the sources in this debate are misrepresented.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pstarr', '
')What have you done -sense, except act cute and dismissive? At least your Hero-Boy JD eats tofu and rides a bike. How has you commitment played out?


I follow perfectly predictable economic behavior. When prices rise, I react in a way consistent with substitution and conservation. I live close to work. I buy locally growth produce and meat. When I move, it is to a more efficient dwelling. Unlike many here, I recognize resource depletion as a serious and long term issue and am generally irritated when pretenders scream "we're all going to die!!" from the rooftops over decades, making sure that those with serious concerns get lumped in with 9/11 crackpots and eco-fascist nutjobs.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Mon 28 Sep 2009, 10:19:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')his whole 'circle the wagons' approach to defend any and all doomers (not just Matt, but Ruppert in the other thread) is the worst possible way to make these issues relevant to the masses.


Bingo.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 13:25:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '1')0% of all the oil ever burned was burned in GWB's first four years. 10% of all the oil left was burned in his second four years.


Math quiz!!

Approx 30 BBO/Year X 4 = 120 BBO Total during Bushes 2nd term. According to Mr There Is No Local Produce In America, this means that the worlds endowment of oil remaining is 10%=120BBO, therefore 100%=1200BBO..... minus the 120BBO used during those 4 years, which means total remaining at the end of Bushes term would be 1080BBO.

The EIA quoting the Oil and Gas Journal says that the world total as of 1/2009 was 1342BBO. Crap! All we've done is proved how poorly Pstarr does math again ( anyone find those 12 gigawatt power plants which haven't been built in the US this past year? :-D )

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/reserves.html

And for some reason, the O&G Journal didn't even account for the Orinoco!

http://cohesion.rice.edu/naturalscience ... oc_id=2819

What happens when we add the Orinoco to the 1342? Suddenly, we have like 2-1/2 TRILLION REMAINING!!

Man....I wonder how Simmons ever accounted for that little hiccup in the reserve numbers when he was worried about Saudi Arabia...seems like he should have gone to Caracus instead and whined about the evils of how fast the heavy oil of the Orinoco might be depleted under the benevolent guidance of Chavez!
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 13:37:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')Simmons, M., Twilight in the Desert (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005 ), p.354:

"The twilight of Saudi Arabia's oil miracle, if properly understood and managed(but won't be), could become the dawn of a more enlightened and sustainable global society (Kumbaya, Kumbaya...)....it could unleash the dawning of a genuine scientific investigation (just look at how cancer, AIDs have been cured) as the world's brightest minds tackle the challenges of inventing a series of new energy forms (fusion, cold fusion, anti-matter, zero point energy, dilithium?) that create even greater security and prosperity for the evoling societies of our new century than we enjoyed through the bounty of affordable and dependable oil."

Emphasis mine.

Fixed that for ya.

The red comments are mine not Simmons.
Last edited by rangerone314 on Tue 29 Sep 2009, 14:21:47, edited 1 time in total.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 13:56:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')Simmons, M., Twilight in the Desert (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005 ), p.354:

"The twilight of Saudi Arabia's oil miracle, if properly understood and managed(but won't be), could become the dawn of a more enlightened and sustainable global society (Kumbaya, Kumbaya...)....it could unleash the dawning of a genuine scientific investigation (just look at how cancer, AIDs have been cured) as the world's brightest minds tackle the challenges of inventing a series of new energy forms (fusion, cold fusion, anti-matter, zero point energy, dilithium?) that create even greater security and prosperity for the evoling societies of our new century than we enjoyed through the bounty of affordable and dependable oil."

Emphasis mine.

Fixed that for ya.


Well...thanks...I guess...but you fixed what Simmons said, not me. And its inappropriate to confuse your version of it with an official reference, so you might want to remove the leading reference to his book, lest someone actually think he said your version, rather than the real version of what he said.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 14:38:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '1')0% of all the oil ever burned was burned in GWB's first four years. 10% of all the oil left was burned in his second four years.


Math quiz!!

Approx 30 BBO/Year X 4 = 120 BBO Total during Bushes 2nd term. According to Mr There Is No Local Produce In America, this means that the worlds endowment of oil remaining is 10%=120BBO, therefore 100%=1200BBO..... minus the 120BBO used during those 4 years, which means total remaining at the end of Bushes term would be 1080BBO.

The EIA quoting the Oil and Gas Journal says that the world total as of 1/2009 was 1342BBO. Crap! All we've done is proved how poorly Pstarr does math again ( anyone find those 12 gigawatt power plants which haven't been built in the US this past year? :-D )

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/reserves.html

And for some reason, the O&G Journal didn't even account for the Orinoco!

http://cohesion.rice.edu/naturalscience ... oc_id=2819

What happens when we add the Orinoco to the 1342? Suddenly, we have like 2-1/2 TRILLION REMAINING!!

Man....I wonder how Simmons ever accounted for that little hiccup in the reserve numbers when he was worried about Saudi Arabia...seems like he should have gone to Caracus instead and whined about the evils of how fast the heavy oil of the Orinoco might be depleted under the benevolent guidance of Chavez!

What are the odds that the full 1.3 trillion bbl of oil from "oil sands" in Orinoco will be able to be recovered? 270 million are recoverable, maybe a little more with much better technology...

I wonder if the amount that could be extracted per day 22 years from now will be enough to match existing field depletion rates of 5-7%? (Given 1-2% taken off that depletion for new fields, that gives 11-22 years for a production halving-point)

For the record, I have my fingers crossed for a long-tail peak oil scenario playing out... more prep time.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Tue 29 Sep 2009, 17:40:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', ']')
What are the odds that the full 1.3 trillion bbl of oil from "oil sands" in Orinoco will be able to be recovered? 270 million are recoverable, maybe a little more with much better technology...


I have found no such estimate on the web yet. Undoubtedly more than zero, undoubtedly less than the full in place estimate. Hirsch makes some assumptions about it I believe, but I'll have to check that.

In almost any case, it changes the number referenced by the O&G Journal to something larger than it is.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '
')I wonder if the amount that could be extracted per day 22 years from now will be enough to match existing field depletion rates of 5-7%? (Given 1-2% taken off that depletion for new fields, that gives 11-22 years for a production halving-point)

For the record, I have my fingers crossed for a long-tail peak oil scenario playing out... more prep time.


Under any circumstances, you can't say that during George's 2nd term that 10% of all remaining oil was used. Just another classic case of "take a number, cull out everything you aren't familiar with or don't like, knock off another 40% just to be safe, and then cut THAT number in half and pretend that this number is significant". Lets not forget, in 1930 anything produced from water was "unconventional". Nowadays, its where all the new oil comes from. Took 80 years. I doubt it will take as many to do the same thing with oil as easy to recover as that in the Orinoco, apparently its just sitting there right near the surface.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 07:55:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', ']')
What are the odds that the full 1.3 trillion bbl of oil from "oil sands" in Orinoco will be able to be recovered? 270 million are recoverable, maybe a little more with much better technology...


I have found no such estimate on the web yet. Undoubtedly more than zero, undoubtedly less than the full in place estimate. Hirsch makes some assumptions about it I believe, but I'll have to check that.

You might want to read the article you posted a link to from rice.edu... it had referred to estimate of 270 million recoverable from Orinoco.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')In almost any case, it changes the number referenced by the O&G Journal to something larger than it is.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '
')I wonder if the amount that could be extracted per day 22 years from now will be enough to match existing field depletion rates of 5-7%? (Given 1-2% taken off that depletion for new fields, that gives 11-22 years for a production halving-point)

For the record, I have my fingers crossed for a long-tail peak oil scenario playing out... more prep time.


Under any circumstances, you can't say that during George's 2nd term that 10% of all remaining oil was used. Just another classic case of "take a number, cull out everything you aren't familiar with or don't like, knock off another 40% just to be safe, and then cut THAT number in half and pretend that this number is significant". Lets not forget, in 1930 anything produced from water was "unconventional". Nowadays, its where all the new oil comes from. Took 80 years. I doubt it will take as many to do the same thing with oil as easy to recover as that in the Orinoco, apparently its just sitting there right near the surface.

pstarr claimed the 10% thing... I never agreed with that estimate.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 09:50:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '
')You might want to read the article you posted a link to from rice.edu... it had referred to estimate of 270 million recoverable from Orinoco.


I saw that...I didn't know whether or not to consider it appropriate. I'm looking for something to back it up, it is after all quite a big number. Look at all that nonsense that went on in the Bakken thread, people took a huge inplace estimate, multiplied it by their favorite possible recovery factor and came up with a Saudi Arabia of oil. The real experts did their analysis and came up with 3 or 4 billion barrels.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '
')pstarr claimed the 10% thing... I never agreed with that estimate.


That happens alot when people look at pstarrs claims. Makes you wonder if he doesn't use one of those magic 8 balls as a source or something.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 14:43:42

Um, that Rice University link says there are 267 billion recoverable barrels in the Orinocco belt, not million

Image

Notice the 3 zeros after the 267, followed by the word "million."
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 14:49:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'U')m, that Rice University link says there are 267 billion recoverable barrels in the Orinocco belt, not million

Image

Notice the 3 zeros after the 267, followed by the word "million."

My bad, my typo...
(I had millions on the brain)
I had just finished dividing 270,000 (miliions) by 74 (millions) and again by 365 (days) to see how many years of oil that MIGHT contribute in delaying end of oil: 10 years.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby RobertRapier » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 15:06:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')his whole 'circle the wagons' approach to defend any and all doomers (not just Matt, but Ruppert in the other thread) is the worst possible way to make these issues relevant to the masses. These people are not the Pope. They do not deserve our unconditional love and protection.

It's ditto-head-like blind loyalty and it's both unnecessary and counter-productive.


This is why I have gone after some of these guys. If you stick your neck out making predictions that are not based on sound arguments, you better prepare for a critical analysis - and debunking if necessary. If we don't police ourselves, that critical analysis will be done by someone who uses that exercise to prove that peak oilers are an incompetent bunch who have cried wolf for too many years.

The fact is, Simmons has made some spectacularly bad predictions based on an incomplete understanding of the data. He did it as last year's ASPO when he predicted the entire country was about to run out of gasoline. I talked to him about it later - explaining why I thought it wasn't an accurate assessment of things. I was asked about it later on a panel session, and I directly contradicted him and said gasoline inventories would rise - not fall - over the next 30 days. Guess who was right? More importantly, guess "why" I was right? Because I understand the inventory data a lot better than he does, because that used to be a key part of my job. Matt sometimes takes a glance, gets a partial picture, and shoots from the hip. (He has done the same with his argument that it will take $100 trillion to fix the rusting oil infrastructure).

Yet any time I have debunked some of these shoddy analyses, those ditto-heads you refer to have thrown much mud. Pstarr here has done it himself, although our more recent exchanges have been more civil. I have been accused of any number of things for just trying to make sure we keep the analyses rigorous.

RR

P.S. That isn't to say that I don't appreciate Matt's contribution. Twilight in the Desert had a great influence on me, and was one of the key reasons that led to me getting publicly involved in this debate.
User avatar
RobertRapier
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby jupiters_release » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 18:35:21

Hi Robert,

Can you post a link where you give your own predictions on oil depletion and its effects?

thanks,
JR
Do not seek the truth, only cease to cherish opinions.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 19:38:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RobertRapier', ' ')If we don't police ourselves, that critical analysis will be done by someone who uses that exercise to prove that peak oilers are an incompetent bunch who have cried wolf for too many years.


Bingo again, twice on the same page.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 19:39:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')crap you don't know what you are talking about. The only reason I am polite is the goddamm COC.


watch your language.

Stop posting things which aren't even real and maybe you won't feel like you need to swear when you get caught.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 20:40:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')he only reason I am polite is the goddamm COC.
When were you polite?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby RobertRapier » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 00:34:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', 'H')i Robert,

Can you post a link where you give your own predictions on oil depletion and its effects?

thanks,
JR


Here are the 64 posts that I have written that have a Peak Oil tag:

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/search/label/Peak%20Oil

There are various predictions and expectations throughout. Skim through and you can certainly get an idea of my views on Peak Oil. I also coined the term Peak Lite, to describe why I thought the impacts of peak would start to occur before the actual peak:

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/search/ ... eak%20Lite

Finally, a report card of my predictions from a couple of years ago.

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2007/07 ... nding.html

Note that several of the "Pending" ended up in the "Confirmed" category (i.e., bankruptcy for Xethanol).

RR
User avatar
RobertRapier
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron