by RobertRapier » Wed 30 Sep 2009, 15:06:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')his whole 'circle the wagons' approach to defend any and all doomers (not just Matt, but Ruppert in the other thread) is the worst possible way to make these issues relevant to the masses. These people are not the Pope. They do not deserve our unconditional love and protection.
It's ditto-head-like blind loyalty and it's both unnecessary and counter-productive.
This is why I have gone after some of these guys. If you stick your neck out making predictions that are not based on sound arguments, you better prepare for a critical analysis - and debunking if necessary. If we don't police ourselves, that critical analysis will be done by someone who uses that exercise to prove that peak oilers are an incompetent bunch who have cried wolf for too many years.
The fact is, Simmons has made some spectacularly bad predictions based on an incomplete understanding of the data. He did it as last year's ASPO when he predicted the entire country was about to run out of gasoline. I talked to him about it later - explaining why I thought it wasn't an accurate assessment of things. I was asked about it later on a panel session, and I directly contradicted him and said gasoline inventories would rise - not fall - over the next 30 days. Guess who was right? More importantly, guess "why" I was right? Because I understand the inventory data a lot better than he does, because that used to be a key part of my job. Matt sometimes takes a glance, gets a partial picture, and shoots from the hip. (He has done the same with his argument that it will take $100 trillion to fix the rusting oil infrastructure).
Yet any time I have debunked some of these shoddy analyses, those ditto-heads you refer to have thrown much mud. Pstarr here has done it himself, although our more recent exchanges have been more civil. I have been accused of any number of things for just trying to make sure we keep the analyses rigorous.
RR
P.S. That isn't to say that I don't appreciate Matt's contribution. Twilight in the Desert had a great influence on me, and was one of the key reasons that led to me getting publicly involved in this debate.