Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The R.A.V.E. Diet

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby virgincrude » Thu 27 Aug 2009, 11:25:15

Very interesting SPG. Thanks!
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 27 Aug 2009, 20:01:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Like I said, the primary problem, IMHO, with vegetarianism nutritionally is that it's virtually impossible to avoid ending up with most of your calories coming from starch. I suppose, in theory you could exist off of mostly nuts, but then you would end up protein deficient. Typically protein in a vegetarian diet is derived from a mixture of grains and beans, i.e. starches.


Boletus edulis Loads of protein, no starch.

Image

Speaking of starch. My grandma lived till 86 on a diet where probably 90% of her calories were coming from grains, potatoes, and milk. She was overweight probably half of her life and close to obese for about a third. She had high blood pressure and I assume sleep apnea. With all that she never saw a doctor in her life, never took a pill or even a multivitamin. She lived through three wars, two famines, forced labour camps, buried all her kids and close relatives, more personal stress and horror than you can imagine. Still had a sharp memory and was more sarcastic than i am at her 86.

Another grandma, same diet, same war/famine count but skinny and less personal drama , sought medical attention at 85yo, so I guess doctors did give her 7 more years to live (appendicitis).


Human are as well as other higher primates are omnivorous and can eat whatever pleases them. This Starch&milk dominated European diet for over 10000 years as well as meat&fish diet dominated in N.America since first squatters came there. Thats at least 600 generations worth. Surely if somebody had personal issues with one type of food or another it got sorted out millenia ago. Now I will not praise one food over another; its all good. As long as you dont get fat, eat everything you want. Or even if you do. You live once, no reason to be hungry and deprive yourself , you will die anyway.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 27 Aug 2009, 20:48:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Like I said, the primary problem, IMHO, with vegetarianism nutritionally is that it's virtually impossible to avoid ending up with most of your calories coming from starch. I suppose, in theory you could exist off of mostly nuts, but then you would end up protein deficient. Typically protein in a vegetarian diet is derived from a mixture of grains and beans, i.e. starches.


Boletus edulis Loads of protein, no starch.


LOL! Right. Exactly how many people are existing off a diet of only boletus edulis?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby Narz » Sun 06 Sep 2009, 21:16:22

I live off a diet of lots of things, I don't understand the whole "if you can't live off of it entirely you shouldn't eat it at all". The Bushman (from whom we're all descended) eat around 60 (or maybe 80, don't remember) different herbs in a single week.

Unless you're starving, the foods you eat for nutrients (vegetables generally) are probably MORE important than what you eat for calories. The Masai (who eat tons of milk & blood) have the protective factor of tons of herbs (IIRC, 20 or so in an average soup).

In general though tons of cooked fat & protein is going to age you & kill you much faster than cooked carbohydrate. Maximum protective elements (vegetables, fruit) with some lightly cooked &/or raw animal fat/protein &/or some cooked starches (which humans have been eating since we've existed, mostly in tuber form) is probably the way to go. Saying "you can't get enough calories from broccoli" misses the point, the idea isn't to get macro nutrients from broccoli.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 06 Sep 2009, 21:39:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'S')aying "you can't get enough calories from broccoli" misses the point, the idea isn't to get macro nutrients from broccoli.


This whole argument is about where you should get the bulk of your calories from. I love broccoli. I eat it all the time. I might even eat some Boletus edulis if I had any clue where to get it. That doesn't change the fact that vegetarians, with few exceptions, get the bulk of their calories from starch and that's not a healthy situation. IMHO anyway.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby Narz » Mon 07 Sep 2009, 20:25:01

According to the bulk of the research starch as the main calorie source is healthier in the long term than cooked fat & protein but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 08 Sep 2009, 08:18:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'A')ccording to the bulk of the research starch as the main calorie source is healthier in the long term than cooked fat & protein but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.


I'm sorry Narz, but that research just doesn't exist. I think you can probably make an unequivocal statement that according to the bulk of the expert opinion starch is healthier. When you start talking about research, AFAIK there's exactly one prospective study that has compared a high-carb starch based diet head to head with a high-fat Atkins type diet. It clearly showed better results with the high fat diet. There are some retrospective observational studies which might be misconstrued to show a benefit to a starch based diet, but, like the China Study, they can't possibly account for the myriad of differences in lifestyle and environment between poor rural populations and comparatively afluent urban populations.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby jedrider » Wed 09 Sep 2009, 01:46:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', 'A')ccording to the bulk of the research starch as the main calorie source is healthier in the long term than cooked fat & protein but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.


I'm sorry Narz, but that research just doesn't exist. I think you can probably make an unequivocal statement that according to the bulk of the expert opinion starch is healthier. When you start talking about research, AFAIK there's exactly one prospective study that has compared a high-carb starch based diet head to head with a high-fat Atkins type diet. It clearly showed better results with the high fat diet. There are some retrospective observational studies which might be misconstrued to show a benefit to a starch based diet, but, like the China Study, they can't possibly account for the myriad of differences in lifestyle and environment between poor rural populations and comparatively afluent urban populations.


There seems to be a lot of evidence that the typical modern diet is very bad for one's health, especially in terms of heart disease and probably being the cause of cancer as well. Life style is most likely intimately related because the calories should either get used or they can become the source of trouble. You report a lot of studies, but I am much more confortable in accepting epidemiological studies of large populations over significant periods of time, although rapid disease reversal using very low fat diets as reported by Andersen seem significant.

I noticed that there is a fast-oxidizer/slow-oxidizer diet that my daughter finds much more acceptable than a RAVE diet. It sounds like hokum to me, but I could accept that some people do prefer starches to proteins and vice-versa and, maybe, there are physiological differences in a population at the root of this.

In the end, you are aguing for a diet as different from the typical diet as RAVE and possibly both are valid, or at least significant improvements on the norm.
User avatar
jedrider
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3107
Joined: Thu 28 May 2009, 10:10:44
Top

Re: The R.A.V.E. Diet

Unread postby aldente » Mon 14 Sep 2009, 17:00:53

edited by author
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron