by rangerone314 » Wed 19 Aug 2009, 07:36:17
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')Which part of a tax code that seeks to Thatcherise the poor into homeowners don't you get? Which part of a tax code that promotes the privately owned asset over the socialised asset don't you get.
Marxists want no truck with scams. This world is for all to use and take is our belief. We remain resolute in that belief despite the "left" label being bandied about as marxian. It isn't. You can reinvent any old story to sustain the ponzi scheme but the fact remains, we ran a Soviet in the USSR with not a single tax coded housing scam and we still got harangued for not having "choice". In your economies, you impose these ideological fundamentals by using the tax code and when things go bad, its our fault for too much choice. Its the fault of your travel mates. Had we run the show, there would be no private ownership of homes. All it does is create bubbles, scams and the homeless.
And despite all its great wonders, lol, the USSR still had major problems with IV drug use and alcoholism.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right
Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take
You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown
Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy