by AgentR » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 13:06:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'V')ietnam, India, East Turkistan and Tibet might disagree.
Just because some of us nutty Texans might declare our independence from Washington, doesn't change the reality that Texas is part of the USA. China has a bit of a problem in perception in this respect because its previous couple of centuries worked to badly fragment it. Most of the "repair" is complete, but issues remain. I see Tibet and Turk-not-a-stan in this category.
India... I think you are fishing... badly. There are no Chinese troops moving to invade New Delhi. Border disputes and complaints do not for power projection make. Power projection would be putting 100,000 troops and their associated hardware in the middle of the Sudan. Thats not how China does business. Such projections really need to be seen as relics of a passed age that serve their masters very poorly.
Vietnam... Well thats a mess, but its a mess of the West's creation. and again, it falls into the borders category; you can't have stuff going "boom" on your borders and just sit and hope for the best. Internal security requires a response commensurate to the perceived threat; which to China, in Vietnam, the treat was as huge as if the USSR moved a half million troops, missiles, and tanks onto the Mexican border.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t will be interesting in near future when food becomes in issue to see what the Chinese will do when land they own or lease in an African country to grow food on for Chinese is taken back because people in that country are starving too.
Seems clear enough to me, they'll buy grain from US Midwest farmers for rinminbi which will then be used to purchase hummers and pickups from China.