Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Racial Tensions

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby the48thronin » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 20:15:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', 'Q')uestion though, is mixing the races really the cure for racism? India is highly mixed yet they still instituted the caste system/racial heirarchy...plenty of racism in other mixed countries as well such as brazil, mexico (against the native mayans still left) etc etc...


steps to eliminating racism


remove race from all public records as non existant trivia...

your turn
Malthusian Riders Member!

Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.

Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
User avatar
the48thronin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 20:34:06

48th? i don't get it...
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby JohnDenver » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 20:57:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'T')he United States of America has a deep, deep history of racism. It's laid out in all soul-destroying detail in Howard Zinn's A People's History Of The United States, which is a very good read, if you're interested.

Philosophically, you cannot square the ideals embodied in the Constitution with the simmering racism that exists in the country - mostly in the South but arguably everywhere to some extent. Anti-racism measures have had to be forced upon the US populace, more or less, from the top down. Remember, we saw top politicians decrying racism in the late 50's and early 60's, well before all the civil rights actions a few years later.


What history shows is that the US *was* a deeply racist country, but I'm not sure why that is relevant today. All the slaves and slaveowners are long dead. For that matter, even the people who enforced or experienced Jim Crow laws are very old and rapidly dying off. Most people today were born and grew up in the era of civil rights and affirmative action. So why is history relevant? If you're going to blame white people living today for acts they had zero part in, then you're talking about collective racial guilt, and there's something very wrong with that.

Undoubtedly, there are simmering racist *attitudes* in the US, but on the whole, overt racist policies and behavior have been almost entirely eradicated. The President and first lady are black. The attorney general is black. Two of the last three secretary of states were black. The chairman of the republican party is black. There is no slavery. There are no lynchings. There are no Jim Crow laws. There is no real discrimination in employment or education, for the simple reason that it's against the law. For that matter, even *talking* negatively about black people is generally regarded as taboo. In fact, the archetypes of racism we see today are quite trivial in the larger scheme of things, like Skip Gates having to show his ID, or black men being unable to hail a taxi.

The point I'm making is this: I think a lot of white people saw the election of Obama as a watershed event which marked the transition to a post-racial society. But now I think they're seeing what a naive illusion that was. There can never be a post-racial society because the race card is too useful and convenient to play. In other words, white people have to bear racial guilt forever, as though it were an unremoveable stain. But if that's the case, then what do white people have to lose? If you vote against the black president, you're a racist. If you vote for the black president, you're still a racist. I think that realization is causing a lot of tension in white minds, and it's emboldening them to start coming out of the closet. After all, if you're going to be called a racist no matter what you do, you might as well just be one. Hence people like Glenn Beck saying stuff like: “There is going to come a time when the people who were forced to live in a politically correct world … [are] going to say, I don’t want to live in a politically correct world. Call me whatever you want. I don’t care anymore.”

Anyway, it's a vibe that I'm definitely picking up on. I'm just trying to describe it.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 21:03:08

That was kinda racist JD...
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby the48thronin » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 22:14:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', '4')8th? i don't get it...

Why not? If there is no race classification there will be no racists ... simple really, if the only box to check was HUMAN ...see what I mean?
like I said first step... your turn!
Malthusian Riders Member!

Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.

Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
User avatar
the48thronin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Sun 16 Aug 2009, 22:35:28

so pretending race/sex/religion doesn't exist makes racism/sexism/hate disappear?
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 00:25:54

Sexism, racism, feudalism and tribalism are symptoms of surplus. When there is surplus in the system, efforts will be made to secure preferential access, invariably with a class bias but with race or gender adding a populist element to that otherwise circumscribed access.

It's a given that in the process of transitioning to the planet's future limits, varieties of these will be resorted to in a bid to preserve the last remanants of that preferential access. However, where they will ultimately fail is in their tendency to preserve the infinite within the limits of the finite.

So yes, we will transition through a period of ruthless bloodletting and quite significant die-off but in the finality we will have to concede to the limits imposed on us BUT within the context of globalised imperatives. We will not be able to uninvent the globalisation of whole regions from the settled Americas to the impending exodus to Asia, just as all previous empires were the foundations upon which later systems sprung from.

One of the changes will involve the realisation that todays foreign resourced ethno-regional cornucopia is the destiny for tomorrows hordes of resourcestan refugee, etc, etc. It's the simple realisation that burning down your neighbours house risks having your neighbour squatting in your bedroom. The era of long term geo-politics will emerge.

This all sounds utopian but cooperation forms the basis of all our lives and is all around us. We tend to take it for granted until we are devoid of choices, which is when we seek out the birth family, tribe, race, gender, etc, etc. This would be subtly different however. I would liken it to a scientific tribalism minus the greed agenda (due to a lack of much to be greedy over) but based on shared commonalities with an overarching global character.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby Auntie_Cipation » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 01:24:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', '4')8th? i don't get it...
Why not? If there is no race classification there will be no racists ... simple really, if the only box to check was HUMAN ...see what I mean?

nah, that's semantics. the word "racist" might be a misnomer, but people's hate, bigotry and prejudice is real. It's just not actually RACE-ism, but culture-ism or class-ism or skin-color-ism. In this case, calling it by its true name doesn't help anything though, it's still hateful.
"... among the ways available in which a man can die, it is a rare and signal distinction to be killed by a leopard."

-- Raymond Dasmann
User avatar
Auntie_Cipation
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby the48thronin » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 01:51:03

When you remove the classification of people, you remove the perception of difference, stratification, and codification. Then you remove the ability to use that codification officially. take away the benefit you remove the tendency to use and accentuate.

is that clearer?
Malthusian Riders Member!

Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.

Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
User avatar
the48thronin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby Auntie_Cipation » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 02:06:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', 'W')hen you remove the classification of people, you remove the perception of difference, stratification, and codification. Then you remove the ability to use that codification officially. take away the benefit you remove the tendency to use and accentuate.

is that clearer?


It was perfectly clear all along. But people's perception of difference is not based on the terminology of using the word 'racism.' Removing any reference to race will not remove the hatred, because the hatred isn't actually based on race, it's based on culture, skin color, and general xenophobia. If you had a way to remove those things from people's perceptions, then I agree with you that it would affect people. Internet forums are a reasonable example -- we generally don't know the race (and sometimes not even the gender) of those we interact with online, and so we don't base any preconceived notions on those attributes. Now, that doesn't mean we don't have any preconceived notions about each other, just that we have to find something else to blame them on other than race. Culture is usually identifiable based on language and contextual references, though, and it's easy enough for us to aim our xenophobia at each other through that channel, so we do -- as you can see, there is no shortage of hatred and rush to stereotype each other online, it just finds another outlet rather than race when race isn't known. And as soon as race is known, it's just as common a target as it is IRL. So, I think what you said is a "nice try but no cigar."
"... among the ways available in which a man can die, it is a rare and signal distinction to be killed by a leopard."

-- Raymond Dasmann
User avatar
Auntie_Cipation
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 02:38:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Auntie_Cipation', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', 'W')hen you remove the classification of people, you remove the perception of difference, stratification, and codification. Then you remove the ability to use that codification officially. take away the benefit you remove the tendency to use and accentuate.

is that clearer?


It was perfectly clear all along. But people's perception of difference is not based on the terminology of using the word 'racism.' Removing any reference to race will not remove the hatred, because the hatred isn't actually based on race, it's based on culture, skin color, and general xenophobia. If you had a way to remove those things from people's perceptions, then I agree with you that it would affect people. Internet forums are a reasonable example -- we generally don't know the race (and sometimes not even the gender) of those we interact with online, and so we don't base any preconceived notions on those attributes. Now, that doesn't mean we don't have any preconceived notions about each other, just that we have to find something else to blame them on other than race. Culture is usually identifiable based on language and contextual references, though, and it's easy enough for us to aim our xenophobia at each other through that channel, so we do -- as you can see, there is no shortage of hatred and rush to stereotype each other online, it just finds another outlet rather than race when race isn't known. And as soon as race is known, it's just as common a target as it is IRL. So, I think what you said is a "nice try but no cigar."


Trying to perceive another reality whilst one is in the throes of a contemporary reality is an impossible task. Fundamental change never comes voluntarily, it only occurs in a transitional vacuum where the choices are non-existent and the next step is natural, evolutionary. It is also a function of its context. America was a function of its time. Who at the time of the early English settlement of the USA could have envisioned the collective of pan-ethnicities it has become yet the context was such that the US and its character was inevitable.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 04:00:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', 'Q')uestion though, is mixing the races really the cure for racism? India is highly mixed yet they still instituted the caste system/racial heirarchy...plenty of racism in other mixed countries as well such as brazil, mexico (against the native mayans still left) etc etc...
steps to eliminating racism remove race from all public records as non existant trivia...
your turn

how about banning marriages within the same race? And banning single women from raising children of their race? Now that should work.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 04:27:15

Curbing bad parenting that breeds precocious "me firsters" would be a better option. I put it down to too much of everything as a child personally.:lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'h')ow about banning marriages within the same race? And banning single women from raising children of their race? Now that should work.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby Grautr » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 04:48:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'C')ome again? Is this for a specific immigrant group or in general? One of the biggest bugbears of the far right is just how well integrated the afro-carribeans got with white girls.

It was in general and I can think of a couple of reasons for this. Firstly, the life of an immigrant is stressful and trying to adapt/or not fitting in with the local culture causes this stress to boil over.

Secondly, agression is not directed at the locals for fear of a massive backlash.

I assume that this is a constant background level of violence rather than race rioting which mostly occures between locals and immigrants in Britain although there have been a couple of riots between immigrant populations too.

What would be even more worrying is the possibility of ethnic genicide similar to what occured in Rwanda. Population pressure is gaining acceptance for the cause of what happened there now.
User avatar
Grautr
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Maastricht, the Netherlands
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 05:02:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grautr', 'W')hat would be even more worrying is the possibility of ethnic genicide similar to what occured in Rwanda. Population pressure is gaining acceptance for the cause of what happened there now.

Rwanda is a good example of an outside agency contriving to divide and rule, in this instance the Belgian colonisers, and the natural consequences of a policy based on short term gain but with long term consequences, both in terms of the debasement of that country and wider refugee implications for countries at large.

Cause and effect.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby JohnDenver » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 09:45:32

Another article on the same phenomenon:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xperts who track hate groups across the U.S. are growing increasingly concerned over violent rhetoric targeted at President Obama.

The Secret Service is investigating a Maryland man who held a sign reading "Death to Obama" and "Death to Michelle and her two stupid kids" outside a town hall meeting this week. And in New Hampshire, another man stood across the street from a Presidential town hall with his gun on full display.

[...]

"I don't think these are simply people who are mentally ill or off their rocker," Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center, told ABC News of those behind the threats. "In a very real sense they represent a genuine reaction, a genuine backlash against Obama."

Experts say a sharp growth in so-called militia groups that helped spawn a wave of domestic terrorism in the 1990s – and are now using YouTube, rock music and the Internet to recruit members and spread hate and fear - shouldn't be ignored.

"I think the president has, in effect, triggered fears amongst fairly large numbers of white people in this country that they are somehow losing their country, that the battle is lost," Potok told ABC News. "The nation that their Christian white forefathers created has somehow been taken from them."

Link

Image
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 09:46:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'S')exism, racism, feudalism and tribalism are symptoms of surplus. When there is surplus in the system, efforts will be made to secure preferential access, invariably with a class bias but with race or gender adding a populist element to that otherwise circumscribed access.

And when there is scarcity, the men contrive rules that allow them to deprive members of their own family. The Taliban would rather burn down schools than let girls learn to read.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 16:35:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'A')nd when there is scarcity, the men contrive rules that allow them to deprive members of their own family. The Taliban would rather burn down schools than let girls learn to read.

The Taliban did not naturally evolve contextually. They were invented by the CIA to fight the Soviets, during a time of CIA subsidised mujaheddin surplus. They exist within a global sea of disproportionate surplus and, if you read my posts, they do refer to one facet of this paradigm constituting the refugee problem we have all grown accustomed to. In other words, disproportionate surplus on a global scale is characterised by excess of surplus as well as scarcity.

The system in other words is the global system, in essence a new class system with ethnicity constituting the new class.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 17:08:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')The Taliban did not naturally evolve contextually. They were invented by the CIA to fight the Soviets, during a time of CIA subsidised mujaheddin surplus. They exist within a global sea of disproportionate surplus and, if you read my posts, they do refer to one facet of this paradigm constituting the refugee problem we have all grown accustomed to. In other words, disproportionate surplus on a global scale is characterised by excess of surplus as well as scarcity.
"disproportionate surplus?" I never thought I'd have any sympathy for a Nazi, but to paraphrase one clever Nazi remark, whenever I hear someone speak of a "facet of a paradigm" I reach for my revolver. High-falutin' language that doesn't mean shite. And what is natural contextual evolution? Tend to your sheep, Kiwi, and forget the intellectual pretensions.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Racial Tensions

Unread postby americandream » Mon 17 Aug 2009, 17:18:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')The Taliban did not naturally evolve contextually. They were invented by the CIA to fight the Soviets, during a time of CIA subsidised mujaheddin surplus. They exist within a global sea of disproportionate surplus and, if you read my posts, they do refer to one facet of this paradigm constituting the refugee problem we have all grown accustomed to. In other words, disproportionate surplus on a global scale is characterised by excess of surplus as well as scarcity.
"disproportionate surplus?" I never thought I'd have any sympathy for a Nazi, but to paraphrase one clever Nazi remark, whenever I hear someone speak of a "facet of a paradigm" I reach for my revolver. High-falutin' language that doesn't mean shite. And what is natural contextual evolution? Tend to your sheep, Kiwi, and forget the intellectual pretensions.


Why? Because its the truth and you'ld rather your peddled lies got first call Brucey boy?

Go feel your head as the Irish would say, and cut the Hollywood bravado.

edit: The Taliban (then "freedom loving" mujahaddin according to one Ronald Reagan) were invented in CIA run schools in Pakistan. Contrived contextually and hardly what one would term a natural cultural development, much like the gun touting lout in the US vis-a-vis Hollywood.


Cio
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron