Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Plantagenet » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 02:29:38

China's top climate change Czar says china will start to reduce its emissions in 2050 and won't consider capping emissions until then because it might hurt their economy.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d11ae554-88fd-11de-b50f-00144feabdc0.html

Given that China will add the equivalent of the entire US's CO2 emissions in about 15 years, by
2050 China should be equal to about 3X current US emissions.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Plantagenet » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 02:33:20

Since china is going to add the equivalent of two more USAs by 2050, its pointless for the US to spend trillions to reduce its own CO2 production by 5-10%. Any reduction made by the US will be swamped by the new CO2 production being built in China.

To put it into perspective, the entire CO2 reduction contemplated by the US will be overwhelmed by a single years new CO2 production added by China, and China is going to keep adding new CO2 production for the next 40 years.

Image
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby eastbay » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 02:42:03

What the USA does to reduce air pollution should be focused on making the air safer to breathe. The CO2 reduction efforts intended to 'save humanity' or 'save the planet' are a waste of time and money.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby mefistofeles » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 04:15:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o put it into perspective, the entire CO2 reduction contemplated by the US will be overwhelmed by a single years new CO2 production added by China, and China is going to keep adding new CO2 production for the next 40 years


If peakoil is true that's not very likely who knows perhaps we already are at "Peak Carbon".
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby essex » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 06:05:41

[quote="eastbay"]What the USA does to reduce air pollution should be focused on making the air safer to breathe. The CO2 reduction efforts intended to 'save humanity' or 'save the planet' are a waste of time and money.[/quote]

Amen to that " breath of fresh air"
User avatar
essex
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Tanada » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 06:51:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o put it into perspective, the entire CO2 reduction contemplated by the US will be overwhelmed by a single years new CO2 production added by China, and China is going to keep adding new CO2 production for the next 40 years


If peakoil is true that's not very likely who knows perhaps we already are at "Peak Carbon".


If Petroleum were the only fossil fuel that might be true, but with all this shale based Natural Gas and Coal in the ground the decline of Petroleum is likely to increase the use of those fuels (and others) not decrease them.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Cloud9 » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 07:56:47

So by capping ourselves, we only weaken our position in the coming resource wars. :cry:
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby kjmclark » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 09:54:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'G')iven that China will add the equivalent of the entire US's CO2 emissions in about 15 years, by 2050 China should be equal to about 3X current US emissions.

So in per capita emissions, they will probably have just caught up with us gluttons in the US. I always think it's funny when pigs ignore the population when they do the comparison - as the pigs say, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"!
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby kjmclark » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 09:57:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'S')o by capping ourselves, we only weaken our position in the coming resource wars. :cry:

You've got that completely backward. By capping ourselves, we free up resources for the military in our coming war with the rest of the world over the remaining oil. That strengthens our position.

Besides, when we end up losing that war, we'll be used to living with less, which will be a good thing! :-D
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Cloud9 » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 11:57:19

You mean by building no more coal fired plants we are some how stronger?
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby hillsidedigger » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 12:45:32

My guess is that most of the Chinese will be poisoned to death long before the year 2050.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Cloud9 » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 13:57:37

Not likely. Have you checked the numbers?
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby kjmclark » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 15:44:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'Y')ou mean by building no more coal fired plants we are some how stronger?

You don't think the rest of the world is going to accept war reparation payments in dollars, do you?

Besides, we'll need all the coal we can get for CTL plants to keep the tractors running.
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby dorlomin » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 16:57:30

Carbon tax at the point of consumption and to hell with cap and trade. Reward those who can manufacturing using the least carbon.

See how quickly the Chinese change their minds.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby americandream » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 17:28:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('essex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'W')hat the USA does to reduce air pollution should be focused on making the air safer to breathe. The CO2 reduction efforts intended to 'save humanity' or 'save the planet' are a waste of time and money.[/quote]

Amen to that " breath of fresh air"


I suspect that this is not a vindication of unrestrained capitalist notions that we can reshape the planet in the image of mega malldom with no consequences but rather an objective recognition that system change and climate compliance will be compelled. In the meantime, marxists recognise that the debate which is between capitalism lite and the free market, is largely window dressing.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby essex » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 17:41:40

•Q: The cost of cutting greenhouse gases, greenhouse emissions, has been estimated at about $300 billion a year ...

•A: Yes, the U.N. calls it a phenomenal amount of money. ... Guess who's going to be in charge of spending and overseeing the money? This is their dream. Controlling carbon dioxide is a bureaucrat's dream. He who controls carbon controls life. And right now the U.N. is a field of dreams. These U.N. bureaucrats can think of nothing better. It's the ultimate, ultimate control of human behavior across the globe.

We inhale oxygen; we exhale carbon dioxide. If you can regulate and declare a toxic pollutant what we exhale from our mouth, you've achieved a level of control George Orwell didn't even contemplate in his book "1984."


http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsbu ... 38348.html
Warmism, like the fascism and communism that preceeded it, will have its brief day in the sun.
User avatar
essex
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby Plantagenet » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 17:50:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('essex', 'â')€¢Q: The cost of cutting greenhouse gases, greenhouse emissions, has been estimated at about $300 billion a year ...

•A: Yes, the U.N. calls it a phenomenal amount of money. ... Guess who's going to be in charge of spending and overseeing the money? This is their dream. Controlling carbon dioxide is a bureaucrat's dream. He who controls carbon controls life. And right now the U.N. is a field of dreams. These U.N. bureaucrats can think of nothing better. It's the ultimate, ultimate control of human behavior across the globe.

We inhale oxygen; we exhale carbon dioxide. If you can regulate and declare a toxic pollutant what we exhale from our mouth, you've achieved a level of control George Orwell didn't even contemplate in his book "1984."


http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsbu ... 38348.html


In a few of the most severely underdeveloped but overpopulated countries, the main source of CO2 emissions is human breathing.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby dorlomin » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 18:32:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('essex', ' ')we exhale carbon dioxide. If you can regulate and declare a toxic pollutant what we exhale from our mouth,
You dont think that CO2 is toxic? Why then have CO2 scrubbers in enclosed enviroments such as submarines and spaceships.

And who is regulating CO2 from breathing. You are making this up as you have failed miserably to come up with other arguments.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: China won't cap or reduce CO2 emission until 2050

Postby americandream » Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:37:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('essex', ' ')we exhale carbon dioxide. If you can regulate and declare a toxic pollutant what we exhale from our mouth,
You dont think that CO2 is toxic? Why then have CO2 scrubbers in enclosed enviroments such as submarines and spaceships.

And who is regulating CO2 from breathing. You are making this up as you have failed miserably to come up with other arguments.


Following essex's logic, I find social and economic conservatism, Orwellian. However I am sure he has good reasons as to why we MUST follow his preferred conventions, all invariably related to personal reward but nevertheless, from his perspective, utterly natural and reasonable.

Many of us however look beyond personal wealth and are equally as valid in our preferred conventions despite not buying into his. We take the position that a closed but graduated climate paradigm does not for unlimited human development on this presently human friendly planet, make. There is no evidence sufficiently strong yet to dissuade me that no matter what we do as a species, the corridor of climate variation in human friendly mode is wide enough to accommodate my inputs.

Time is the ultimate arbiter as it always has been, however.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron