Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil is Here

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Peak Oil is Here

Unread postby charliehelyes » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 07:08:51

As many of you may know saudi arabia has 'tossed aside' its production cap this means that it is pumping 100% in a race to keep up with demand but this is a race they can never win puming at 100% will just make the downside of the peak more steep, another sign is oil is now at $56.80 if this brakes the record of a few weeks ago $58 i will be worried. I think there should be a thread to discuss the news we have got in the last week and also to post any short term signs that we are peaking.!
User avatar
charliehelyes
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Raxozanne » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 07:53:41

I think we are probably entering the recession cycle (or will be very soon). We should soon be seeing a recession which will bring oil consumption down for a while until demand once again radically outstripes supply and then expect another recession.
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby lowem » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 09:36:50

So you're thinking of the "bumpy plateau" scenario? Hit the wall, bounce back, hit the wall again ...
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore

Unread postby charliehelyes » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 10:05:23

i think there will be 2 peaks one in 2005 and supply will go down it will then go up for a while due to some super projects in 2007-2008 then it will keep going down
User avatar
charliehelyes
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 10:43:48

It is possible that global oil production might reach a slightly higher level later in the decade, after a recession.

But, business and political leaders worldwide are now becoming aware that the days of cheap oil are gone forever. That changes everything. For psychological and political purposes. peak oil is here now.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby smiley » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 11:00:53

I have some doubts about these superprojects. Of the "super" projects that were started up in the past couple of years, I can't name one which lived up to its expectation.

For the future I only see one project which deserves the name megaproject. But the Caspian is slowly turning into a nightmare. BP and Statoil recently bailed out leaving huge losses behind.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby Aaron » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 11:13:18

The global "race" for oil & gas resources began years ago, and has culminated in the strategic military & economic activities we see today, as the powers that be position themselves for the game of the millennium.

America's occupation of Iraq has opened the gateway for possible Chinese military adventurism, in addition to the virtual economic colonization China practices today.

The Russian's seem reluctant to accept foreign investments in developing their oil production capabilities.

OPEC has announced they are getting out of the oil business completely, to concentrate on "spin" press releases and market manipulation.

Western Europeans seems to believe they will conserve their way forward, as energy supplies shrink.

India & Africa remain teeming cauldrons of humanity which are almost certain to experience social unrest. war and a human crisis of death & disease not seen in modern times.

Worried about peak oil?

Me too...

More worried about the crazy monkeys with the big guns though.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby Such » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 12:39:03

oh yeah... we're in the "bumpy plateau" phase now... which I think could go on for a decade or more... and probably delay the ultimate "peak date"... which will be a really random event given teh ups and downs we're going through.

a bumpy plateau is probably better than a headlong charge into brick wall.
Such
 

Unread postby cube » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 13:41:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '.')...
The Russian's seem reluctant to accept foreign investments in developing their oil production capabilities.

......
Yeah and it's funny how the media is reporting it. They make it seem like it's some foolish power grab by Putin aspiring to be a dictactor. Maybe this is some type of grand strategy to prepare for PO? Why sell off your oil for $55/barrel today when it's going to be worth triple that when PO hits? We'll find out in a couple years. 8)

As for SA pumping full tilt I was under the impression (correct me if I'm wrong) that they still have a little bit of spare production capacity but it's all heavy sour crude?
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 14:03:29

I think we may well have hit peak last year. Yes, there are other projects scheduled to come online, but not enough to make up for the decline of all the others.

Kind of like the U.S. depletion curve:

Image

The peak was in 1970. The discovery of oil in Alaska increased production briefly, but not to a point higher than the peak.

If Ghawar is in depletion...I just can't see any new discoveries making up for that.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby RidgeRunner » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 14:11:49

Aaron wrote:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Russian's seem reluctant to accept foreign investments in developing their oil production capabilities.


Could this be part of a larger plan?

I am not exactly sure of these numbers but from what I remember from last year Russia was pumping around 9.5mbd. Then came the Yukos situation and production dropped. The most recent production figures I have heard about for Russia, and these may be a couple months old, was that they were pumping somewhere between 6-8mbd.

Consider this;

Russian production drops from 9+mbd to 6-8mbd.

Russian government guts Yukos' production capability.

Russian controled company now owns large part of former Yukos production capability.

Russia now requires that a Russian company must hold at least 51% ownership in all oil/gas projects.

Russian production is not expanding to last years level even though prices are at record levels.

Russia is claiming that they will expand production but need more foreign investment, but as Aaron stated, "The Russian's seem reluctant to accept foreign investments"

Russian oil production figures are a State secret.


I have to ask myself and you.

1. Could Russia be planning, or be in the early stages of nationalizing oil production?

2. Or could Russia be setting up a false production ceiling?

Many of the things that Russia has done over the past year would make sense if they were setting up a false production ceiling. And a false production ceiling could be very beneficial to a world superpower in the future in one or two ways.

First, by setting up this ceiling, they could sit back and wait until OPEC is pumping at full capacity and unable to pump anymore (peak oil for OPEC). Russia could then slip in with the spare capacity that they have been sitting on and take over Saudi Arabia's role as the world's swing producer, which would give them great power in the world markets considering that their words are backed up with military power and nukes.

Second, could they be setting up a false ceiling to reserve oil for future military purposes while still keeping the price of oil high to maxiumize profits but at a lower production level.
This would allow them to be one of the last men standing, if you will, after most or all of the other countries have peaked.

Somehow I cannot see Russia selling all their oil on the world market to a point that they would risk not having enough to protect themselves or to project their influence while the US, China or another country with military power may still have enough oil to do so.

The first world power to run out of oil is the first world power that is no longer a world power. The last man standing wins.
User avatar
RidgeRunner
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon 28 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Indiana

Unread postby Cyrus » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 14:12:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he peak was in 1970. The discovery of oil in Alaska increased production briefly, but not to a point higher than the peak.

If Ghawar is in depletion...I just can't see any new discoveries making up for that.


That is why I strongly believe there will be a hard crash. I also belive there will be a much steeper decline for world production than US production due to the extraction techniques used in the larger oil fields.
User avatar
Cyrus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 25 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 14:26:02

I think the downslope will be very steep. A lot of the predictions are based on U.S. depletion curves, but those were exploited with old technology. We've gotten about as efficient as we are likely to get at finding and extracting oil, and the result is wells with shorter, steeper lives.

I'm not sure if that will result in a hard crash, economically speaking. It might. OTOH, we have so much room to cut back, we may fool ourselves for years. Developing lighter and more efficient cars, switching to telecommuting and carpooling, turning the thermostat down in winter and up in summer, rolling blackouts, like in Baghdad. We may go on for quite awhile, before people realize the days of SUVs and airconditioning are gone forever.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby smiley » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 18:32:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am not exactly sure of these numbers but from what I remember from last year Russia was pumping around 9.5mbd. Then came the Yukos situation and production dropped. The most recent production figures I have heard about for Russia, and these may be a couple months old, was that they were pumping somewhere between 6-8mbd.


Luckily the drop is not that severe, they are still pumping in excess of 9 mbd. If it really was 6-8 we would have $100 oil by now.

Russian oil production

But it is also interesting to notice that the drop is not caused by Yukos. Yukos is producing roughly the same as before the problems. The company which seems to suffer most of the production problems seems to be BP-TKN which is outside the reach of the government.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 24 Apr 2005, 21:52:00

Moderators Note:

charliehelyes has been banned from this site for past troll posting, but since this subject is getting good debate, I'll let it stay.

MQ
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby k_semler » Mon 25 Apr 2005, 00:07:42

*shakes magic 8 ball* *turns over* "All Signs Point To Yes". Uh-Oh! 8O
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby Grimnir » Mon 25 Apr 2005, 02:13:20

If Saudi Arabia is tossing aside quotas, it implies that they are capable of producing more than the quota lets them. Therefore, we are not yet at peak. All that's happened is that demand has caught up with supply under the old quota system (or, more cynically, SA wants to take advantage of high prices by selling as much as possible). Things could get unpleasant without a swing producer, but I don't think this announcement by itself means that peak is here.
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA

Unread postby sjn » Mon 25 Apr 2005, 07:08:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grimnir', 'I')f Saudi Arabia is tossing aside quotas, it implies that they are capable of producing more than the quota lets them. Therefore, we are not yet at peak. All that's happened is that demand has caught up with supply under the old quota system (or, more cynically, SA wants to take advantage of high prices by selling as much as possible). Things could get unpleasant without a swing producer, but I don't think this announcement by itself means that peak is here.


Sounds a little like wishful thinking. If they're at full capacity now, where is the extra going to come from to push peak further out? That's even assuming they're pumping more now than they were before, which there is no evidence for yet...
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby Pops » Mon 25 Apr 2005, 09:19:03

This little bit of news was shocking to me simply because OPEC “quotas” have been part of the landscape my entire adult life.

The whole point of the cartel is to regulate production by each member so all can benefit from higher prices and or cool down the market to keep up demand. Even if the rest of the members are pumping full tilt and the quota only limits SA from pumping it’s spare capacity the system still works. OTOH, if SA has nothing to spare, then at least for now the issue is moot – the limiting factor truly is physical supply, not politics or profit.

As I mentioned on the other thread, with the meeting with Bush coming up this is a good PR move by the Saudis.

I agree that we aren’t necessarily there yet – although like everyone I’m merely speculating. That hardly matters of course, whether supply continues to increase or not, as long as it limits demand the price will remain high.

Of course to be somewhat optimistic in this doomsday thread, don’t forget that demand has been rising fairly dramatically. If the market for marshmallows increased suddenly it would take a while for the mechanics of production to catch up as well. There are lots of constraints such as drilling, shipping, refining, blah, blah that don’t simply multiply overnight.

Fair and balanced – that’s my motto!
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby Grimnir » Mon 25 Apr 2005, 13:14:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grimnir', 'I')f Saudi Arabia is tossing aside quotas, it implies that they are capable of producing more than the quota lets them. Therefore, we are not yet at peak. All that's happened is that demand has caught up with supply under the old quota system (or, more cynically, SA wants to take advantage of high prices by selling as much as possible). Things could get unpleasant without a swing producer, but I don't think this announcement by itself means that peak is here.


Sounds a little like wishful thinking. If they're at full capacity now, where is the extra going to come from to push peak further out? That's even assuming they're pumping more now than they were before, which there is no evidence for yet...


That's just the thing; they are not at full capacity now. If they were, there would be no point in dropping the quota because they wouldn't be able to exceed it anyway. All they're saying is that they will no longer artificially limit their production. There could be all kinds of negative consequences from that decision, but it doesn't in any way imply that they're about to go into decline. There are perhaps other signs that point in that direction, but this isn't one of them.
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests