by vision-master » Tue 30 Jun 2009, 19:49:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'B')oth of you really seem to be suggesting that he should not have pursued all his legal avenues of appeal on the election. I tend to think politicians should ALWAYS pursue the legal avenues to their conclusions when the margin is very slim; as its really the only way the system gets tested and improved for one; but it also guarantees that the process is truly open and visible.
Would the punchcard and funky ballot printing that happened in Florida ever have been noticed and challenged with any intensity if the election hadn't hinged on Florida, or the Florida vote had been 55 / 45 for either candidate? I think not.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')innesota's battleground status was cemented, however, in it's tight elections for Governor, both in 1960 when Republican Elmer Andersen narrowly defeated Democratic incumbent Orville Freedman and in the the breathtakingly close 1962 gubernatorial election, where Andersen lost reelection to Democrat Karl Rolvaag in the tightest election in Minnesota history.
The final margin was 619,842 votes for Rolvaag to 619,751 votes for Anderson...a margin of only 91 votes or less than 0.01% of the vote.
Unlike the current Senate race, which is in it's sixth month of litigation, the 1962 Gubernatorial race was decided in just over four months.