Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Book: "A Nation of Farmers" By Sharon Astyk & Aaron Newton

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Nefarious » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 14:57:26

When I was a boy I used to go visit my grandmother. She had a 1 1/4 acre garden. You can get a lot of food from 1 and a 1/4 acres.I remeber hulling purple hull peas for days till my thumbs were so tender they hurt with the slightest touch. Same thing with snap beans 3 or 4 of us sitting around snapping beans for 2 or 3 days. She grew corn, peas,beans,squash,egg plant, potatoes,tomatoes,turnip greens,cabbage,watermelon,lettuce, cucumbers and probably a few things I have forgotten about. That garden gave plenty of food for my grandparents, and aunt and uncle with their 2 kids. left enough over for freezing and canning and gave some to the neighbors. She worked in that garden everyday from sun up till sun down except on Sunday when she went to church but was back in it as soon as she was home. Seems she always had to do something in it regarless of the time of year. She was born in 1914 and had been working in a garden since she was 8 years old according to her. She was in her late 60's early 70's when I used to go to her house for the summer time.
I have to agree with davep you can get a lot out of a little if you know what you're doing. My Grandmother sure did!
'By the pricking of my thumbs,Something Wicked This Way Comes."
User avatar
Nefarious
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Location: The Deep South

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby hillsidedigger » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 17:37:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '
')Note: Many farmable areas would be completely depleted within a few seasons of 2 people per acre production without intensive inputs from off the site.



Essentially permanent fertility can be maintained through mulching with materials grown onsite. See "Biointensive,""Permaculture," and "Natural Farming."


That is what I have been attempting here for over a dozen years now and I think the term 'permanent fertility' is misleading. Periods, even long periods, of allowing the native plants (trees or tall grasses depending on the location) to reclaim and occupy a site tends to bring nutrients to the surface from deep underground via the long deep roots.

Another reason for the average of 10 acres per person figure for the farmland in Amercia is that everyone is not going to have a bumper crop every year. In a given year, many areas will have too much rain, many too little. Vast regions may have an abnormally late or early freeze.

As well, I was figuring on at least a few people (like 1/3rd.) in the 'nation of farmers' not being farmers and therefore the active farmers need to grow some (50%) more than their own needs.
Last edited by hillsidedigger on Wed 24 Jun 2009, 07:58:57, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby davep » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 17:52:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '
')Note: Many farmable areas would be completely depleted within a few seasons of 2 people per acre production without intensive inputs from off the site.



Essentially permanent fertility can be maintained through mulching with materials grown onsite. See "Biointensive,""Permaculture," and "Natural Farming."


That is what I have been attempting here for a few years noiw and I think the term 'permanent fertility' is misleading. Periods, even long periods, of allowing the native plants (trees or tall grasses depending on the location) to reclaim and occupy a site tends to bring nutrients to the surface from deep underground via the long deep roots.


That's what I'm currently doing in the main fields. I just cut the grass once a year and leave it in situ. A vanishingly small percentage is used for compost. Already, after two years, I'm seeing improvements in overall growth and in insect populations. But I always leave a good few metres round the boundary where the trees are, to be left as insect sanctuaries, as well as leaving maybe five percent of the grass uncut. It seems to be appreciated by butterflies and other critters who will then go on to minimise any infestation.

The point is to improve humus content while we still can. I find leaving dried hay in the fields is already showing decent results. We had NO topsoil whn I got here. It's already starting to develop. That way, what is considered as marginal land can start becoming something altogether more interesting.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Ludi » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 19:19:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '
')Note: Many farmable areas would be completely depleted within a few seasons of 2 people per acre production without intensive inputs from off the site.



Essentially permanent fertility can be maintained through mulching with materials grown onsite. See "Biointensive,""Permaculture," and "Natural Farming."


That is what I have been attempting here for over a dozen years now and I think the term 'permanent fertility' is misleading. Periods, even long periods, of allowing the native plants (trees or tall grasses depending on the location) to reclaim and occupy a site tends to bring nutrients to the surface from deep underground via the long deep roots.



These methods use trees as part of the design, to provide mulch. You can use native trees if you want. I try to include as many native plants as I can in my gardens. With these methods, there's no reason a garden can't be nearly as fertile as a prairie or forest, it seems to me.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby wisconsin_cur » Tue 23 Jun 2009, 22:00:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', 'T')hanks for the review, Wis. Is it mostly an investigative and reporting book about the farming industry or does it lay out how to accomplish a nation of farmers (by showing how we can be one)?

At only $13 or so on Amazon, I'm adding it to my shopping cart for when I have the funds available.


I guess I would call it a manifesto. Mostly why we need to rather than how to do it.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby hillsidedigger » Wed 24 Jun 2009, 08:04:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nefarious', 'W')hen I was a boy I used to go visit my grandmother. She had a 1 1/4 acre garden. You can get a lot of food from 1 and a 1/4 acres.I remeber hulling purple hull peas for days till my thumbs were so tender they hurt with the slightest touch. Same thing with snap beans 3 or 4 of us sitting around snapping beans for 2 or 3 days. She grew corn, peas,beans,squash,egg plant, potatoes,tomatoes,turnip greens,cabbage,watermelon,lettuce, cucumbers and probably a few things I have forgotten about. That garden gave plenty of food for my grandparents, and aunt and uncle with their 2 kids. left enough over for freezing and canning and gave some to the neighbors. She worked in that garden everyday from sun up till sun down except on Sunday when she went to church but was back in it as soon as she was home. Seems she always had to do something in it regarless of the time of year. She was born in 1914 and had been working in a garden since she was 8 years old according to her. She was in her late 60's early 70's when I used to go to her house for the summer time.
I have to agree with davep you can get a lot out of a little if you know what you're doing. My Grandmother sure did!


My mother grew up on a 28 acre subsistance farm (family of 10), my father on a 70 acre subsistance farm (family of 6) and both were born in the same time period as your grandmother. Both farms did sell what they could but still that wasn't much. Of course, in those days all such farms had a complete regime of livestock including chickens, pigs, cows, horses and mules. Livestock require a lot of land. Even with all the livestock, most meals were largely beans, cornbread and potatoes.

I grew up on a 15 acre 'hobby' farm since my father had a full-time job as a school teacher, Summers off though. We usually had one cow, a couple of pigs, a bunch of chickens, a large garden and a 5 acre patch of fieldcorn.

I'm of the opinion that draught animals cannot earn their keep from only plowing although if they are also used for transportation then they might be worth the trouble in a LATOC situation.

Times sure have changed. My mother's family's farm is now a trailer-park and my father's famiy's farm being within what became a resort area is covered with very expensive Second/Weekend/Retirement homes. There are also some 'crazy' people who have their primary residence there who consider the 120 mile one-way daily commute to Atlanta to be reasonable (and we wonder where all the oil is going)!
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby mos6507 » Wed 24 Jun 2009, 10:24:23

I can only say for myself that whenever I see an acre or two of open land it looks positively immense. The big problem I see with the smaller and smaller plots as you converge down onto the 1/4 acre average suburban lot is the amount of square footage you're actually using for plants dwindles because of the overhead of the house, shed, garage, composting bins, as well as areas too heavily shaded by these or adjacent structures. So you're not really using all of the 1/4 acre, only a small portion of it. Once you get into the acres, the ratio of growing space to dead space is much more favorable. But of course once you get big enough a single household can't work it without a tractor or livestock. Then you're dealing with allocating MORE space for biofuel and grazing, barns, etc... But whatever the ideal size is, we're going to have to deal with the world as it exists. In the future we're going to be constrained in the amount of demolition and new construction we're going to be able to do. The housing development we have today is a monument to 50+ years of energy use. That embodied energy and time invested in manpower is probably well in excess of anything we could muster post-peak to transform it. Even doing something as simple as superinsulating every home is a longshot. The majority of us are going to have to adapt-in-place.
mos6507
 

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Pops » Wed 24 Jun 2009, 11:49:50

The website for the book - http://anationoffarmers.com/index.php talks about the news stories of people fighting in the line to get free food last year, I don't know how many of you saw those clips but as I remember 80% of those folks were at least 20% overweight.

I'll bet a dollar none had a garden then and don't now and they would laugh at the idea of buying potatoes at the Farmers Market (let alone growing some) since the oil soaked fries at Mickey D's are cheaper, taste better, and are already cooked. The Mouse buys more beef, pork and potatoes than anyone and he ain't eating it all himself.

The arguments about how much land would be required for a different type of food supply at this population level is really moot - we have plenty of food, waste infinitely more and the effort/cost to change would be immense.

It's not that I think we'll always have this system, it's just I doubt we'll have anything different at this population.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby killJOY » Fri 26 Jun 2009, 21:55:03

Astyk is the premier peak oil scammer.

She claims to be a "subsistence farmer," yet she runs a website and goes on book tours. "Subsistence farmer" my ass. I grow nearly all my own vegetables and meat, preserve it by canning, salting , and freezing, make cheese, maintain an orchard, cut hay, milk cows, but I'd puke if someone called me a subsistence farmer. I'm a farmer out of choice, not subsistence. I have income through other means, including working on an organic farm.

Astyk likes to repeatedly remind people that she once picked kale when she was 9 months pregnant. So. What. This makes her, like, the expert?

A woman with four kids lecturing the world on how to eat "sustainably" is like a cannibal preaching vegetarianism.

She's another peak oil prognosticator who gazes longingly into the future and sees her own fat ass gazing longingly back.

The line about the era of cheap food being over is just a lie. Food is still dirt cheap by historical standards.


The food crisis that these alarmists like to flog is a figment of their imaginations. When/if there is a liquid fuels crisis, you can bet your ass the industrial agricultural system will be maintained at all costs. There will be allocation of fuel resources. Simply by cutting back on recreational uses for gasoline, the US could keep its current food system running for decades without a blip.

The US is not going to become a nation of farmers. And I could care less. I like to farm, and that's all that matters to me.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 26 Jun 2009, 22:18:38

How do you really feel? :wink:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', ' ')I could care less... that's all that matters to me.


Glad you got your priorities straight

In her defense she actually addresses many of your criticisms. Regardless, she is a true believer and is doing what she can.

I am a true believer and am doing what I can. To pay the bills in the short run I have an awful commute that is probably in the top 5% of the nation. Does that mean I have nothing to say on the issue? Am I a scammer?

I don't know.

I thought it just meant that I was doing the best I can in a crazy mixed up world.
Just because everyone needs someone to look down on
I thought most of us were just trying to do the best we can.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby TheDude » Sat 27 Jun 2009, 03:55:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'T')he food crisis that these alarmists like to flog is a figment of their imaginations. When/if there is a liquid fuels crisis, you can bet your ass the industrial agricultural system will be maintained at all costs. There will be allocation of fuel resources. Simply by cutting back on recreational uses for gasoline, the US could keep its current food system running for decades without a blip.


That's a steep bet. I always tell people I'd have expected New Orleans and the World Trade Center to have been rebuilt by now, too. We had engineers in WWII rebuilding the same bridges every night. This is mostly a matter of allocating capital, of course; I wouldn't be very assured about the government successfully allocating jack anymore in a crisis. Look to Zimbabwe for an example of things going completely haywire. "Can't happen here"? How many times have we heard that kind of exceptionalism and had it bite us on the collective ass?

At the very least I don't dismiss someone like Sharon for doing a fair share of advocacy. She's won a lot of people over to her cause and spread a lot of information around in the process. Horrors that they're wasting time picking weeds when they could've made all that money flipping houses.

Picked up a copy of the manifesto at the library today and will dig in when I finish my current read, a novel set 164 years from now after the Effloresence of Oil and the False Tribultation.

Image
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby killJOY » Sat 27 Jun 2009, 07:46:38

I realize this morning that my language was a little harsh, and I apologize for that, but I am not going to edit the piece because it does represent my thinking.

The Dude--I think you are right. I wasn't advocating, merely describing what I think will be the case. Take a flight down the east coast (as I did last Feb.) and when you see those sprawling masses of cities you instantly recognize that the die is cast--industrial agriculture is here to stay. Small farming will continue to be a niche for those of us who enjoy doing it.

My ultimate view is the overshoot/dieooff view, and no amount of home canning will ensure survival because of the sheer incomprehension of how this event will transpire.

There are enough farming/gardening books out there. Middle-class intellectuals posing as latter-day Tom Joads (while raking in the attention and the dough) is one of those pretenses that I find particularly noisome.

Subsistence farming is harsh and dangerous. Those of us who have the land to grow our own food are damned lucky.
Last edited by killJOY on Sat 27 Jun 2009, 09:30:37, edited 1 time in total.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby hillsidedigger » Sat 27 Jun 2009, 08:04:58

Here's an article tiled 'Farming for Nine billion People':

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/ ... on-people/
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby killJOY » Sat 27 Jun 2009, 08:37:47

Thanks for that article.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow will the world meet the growing energy and food demands of a population projected to approach nine billion in 2050? And how can it do so in a sustainable manner, despite the prospect of climate change?


It won't, and it can't. Because humans will never, never, never, never, never, never learn NOT to use "growing" and "sustainable" in the same sentence.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')armers, markets and governments will need to look at “a whole host of options” including “the re-emergence of small, self-sufficient organic farms, characterized as local, multi-crop, energy and water efficient, low-carbon, socially just, and self-sustaining,” according the Mark Fulton, the bank’s global head for climate change investment research.


This is hilarious. This cute little animal Doesn't Exist. Organic farms are just as dependent on the current energy paradigm as industrial ag. I WORK at an "organic" farm. It is heavily dependent on 1)diesel fuel to till, haul, cultivate; 2) plastic for mulch, piping, potting and greenhouse covers; 3) electricity for keeping seedlings warm, lighting, irrigation, fencing, etc.; 4) chemical industry for such PESTICIDES as Entrust, Diatech, Pyganic; for such FERTILIZERS as rock phosphate, lime, seed meals, greensand, etc.

Jared Diamond was right: "Farming" is the very definition of unsustainability! We must farm because we must GROW!

Growth will end.


Enjoy your life now.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby TheDude » Sat 27 Jun 2009, 16:37:20

Thought a whole big cornerstone of organic was natural herbicides etc.; otherwise it's quasi all way, as Pollan's example of Cascadian Farms, who only take things far enough to insure that BS USDA label.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ared Diamond was right: "Farming" is the very definition of unsustainability! We must farm because we must GROW!


What about those Farmers of Forty Centuries? That's a long enough haul for me to be satisfied. Whatever happens to humanity post-Holocene won't be decided by typing on a forum, after all.

Do agree that there's just too many freakin' people at the moment and not enough cheap energy; or that it would help if there was. Came across some quote from Amory Lovins that the worse thing for the planet would be a limitless cheap source of energy, because of what we'd do with it. And this is Mr Rocky Mountain Institute Negawatts talking here!
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Ludi » Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:11:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'T')hought a whole big cornerstone of organic was natural herbicides etc.;



Personally I have a problem with the whole idea of "cides." If your goal is life, why are you running around trying to kill things? (By "you" I mean organic farmers, not "you" The Dude! :) ) Growing food doesn't require killing critters, in my experience. I've rarely had any problems with "pests", and those that existed were due to bad growing conditions (poor soil, not enough water) and not due to insects being "pests." The insects were telling me the plants were stressed. Stressed plants give out chemical signals that attract insects. Weeds also aren't a problem in a well-managed garden. They might be a problem in a big monoculture, but big monocultures aren't really a good idea, in my opinion.

"Organic" doesn't really mean anything significant, I'm afraid, because of this need to get certification. It doesn't mean healthy, or good for the biosphere, or anything of that sort. It just means "got organic certification." Slightly better than chemical ag, but not much. In my opinion.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby hillsidedigger » Sun 28 Jun 2009, 13:14:56

"Thought a whole big cornerstone of organic was natural herbicides etc.;"

Offhand, I don't know of a natural herbicide. There are natural insecticides but they are of limited need in a properly managed garden.

The inter-planting of a few radish seeds with squash plants gets rid of squash bugs.

The planting of 4 O'Clock flowers in a garden will rid the garden of japanese beetles.

Keeping a few chickens or guinea fowl to run thru a garden and eat bugs is very effective.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Quinny » Sun 28 Jun 2009, 14:21:06

Theres never too many slugs, just not enough ducks.. :)
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby Cloud9 » Sun 28 Jun 2009, 18:33:02

Crockett's Victory Garden is a good read.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A Nation of Farmers

Postby wisconsin_cur » Sun 28 Jun 2009, 19:39:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', '
')
Offhand, I don't know of a natural herbicide.


I know of a couple:

Image

Image

Image

:wink:
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Previous

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests