Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design: Who's Right?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 18 Jun 2009, 19:57:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you not understand the question? Without the meteror impact, the animals you see today would not exist.

So, did God wipe out the dinosaurs with a meteor so he could redesign creation?


It was a cosmic event.



Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 18 Jun 2009, 20:04:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you not understand the question? Without the meteror impact, the animals you see today would not exist.

So, did God wipe out the dinosaurs with a meteor so he could redesign creation?


It was a cosmic event.



Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?


Since when is 'God' a he? :?:

I haven't brought up the word 'God' or 'Jesus' or 'Bible' unless someone assumed THIS is what I'm talking about. It's NOT!

It seems to me the evolutionists here are anti-christian. I claim to be neither nor christian either. :idea:

PS: You must have gone to a Catholic School as a lad. :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 18 Jun 2009, 20:37:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you not understand the question? Without the meteror impact, the animals you see today would not exist.

So, did God wipe out the dinosaurs with a meteor so he could redesign creation?


It was a cosmic event.



Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?


Since when is 'God' a he? :?:


You are avoiding the question with irrelevancies.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 18 Jun 2009, 21:10:55

Intelligent design fails for the same reason it always has: The living world is filled with evidence that complex organisms not only could have evolved through evolution's trial-and-error mechanism, but must have done so, because their structure, their physiology, and even their genetic makeup are all inconsistent with the demands of intelligent design.

Those that cling to this ID notion either haven't done their homework or won't.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby Grautr » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 03:09:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grautr', ' ')Why do you think they have stopped evolving?


If it ain't broke, don't fix it.


Are you saying the Mayfly is at the peak of its evolution? surely it could be faster, bigger (or if nessessary smaller) or smarter.
User avatar
Grautr
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Maastricht, the Netherlands
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby katkinkate » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 03:25:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grautr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grautr', ' ')Why do you think they have stopped evolving?


If it ain't broke, don't fix it.


Are you saying the Mayfly is at the peak of its evolution? surely it could be faster, bigger (or if nessessary smaller) or smarter.


Evolution continues in all life, just when an organism finds a niche that doesn't change much they tend not to change much in obvious ways. The mayfly shape (as well as cockroaches, dragonflies, spiders, fish, salamanders, crocodiles and many more) is fine for its place and no changes of body plan are needed, but molecular changes are certain to have occurred and there have probably been small physical changes to structures over time. The mayflies of today are different species than the mayflies of a million years ago.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 08:51:29

Darwins theory of Evolution is the biggest fraud of modern civilization. :)

Natural:
1: based on an inherent sense of right and wrong <natural justice>
2 a: being in accordance with or determined by nature b: having or constituting a classification based on features existing in nature

Selection:
1: the act or process of selecting : the state of being selected
2: one that is selected : choice ; also : a collection of selected things

Selected? By who? :lol:
vision-master
 

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 10:30:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'D')arwins theory of Evolution is the biggest fraud of modern civilization. :)

Natural:
1: based on an inherent sense of right and wrong <natural justice>
2 a: being in accordance with or determined by nature b: having or constituting a classification based on features existing in nature

Selection:
1: the act or process of selecting : the state of being selected
2: one that is selected : choice ; also : a collection of selected things

Selected? By who? :lol:



VM, back in the old days when you had a good shot, did you aim for women with nice tities and good butts, long legs and at least an ok face? Did you estimate her age before rushing in? That is called natural selection too VM.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 10:32:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', ' ')Selected? By who? :lol:


Selected by chance.

Natural selection "selects" when the natural genetic variation within a population of organisms makes it more likely for an organism to survive and successfully reproduce and it becomes more common over successive generations of a population.

Nature doesn't select and species don't adapt by proactive choice or by design. It's a roll of the dice depending upon the changes required in an ever changing environment.

So, you just showed your ignorance of the process you try to belittle.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 10:37:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', ' ')Selected? By who? :lol:


Selected by chance.

Natural selection "selects" when the natural genetic variation within a population of organisms makes it more likely for an organism to survive and successfully reproduce and it becomes more common over successive generations of a population.

Nature doesn't select and species don't adapt by proactive choice or by design. It's a roll of the dice depending upon the changes required in an ever changing environment.

So, you just showed your ignorance of the process you try to belittle.


If it's natural and ramdom process, what difference does it make if the organism survives or not! Who cares?

Natural and selection don't make sense. :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 10:55:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', ' ') If it's natural and ramdom process, what difference does it make if the organism survives or not! Who cares?


99% of all species that ever existed no longer do.

What difference does it make if the organism survives or not? They get to live on and pass on their genes to their offspring.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 10:57:28

Still wating, VM:

Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?

How did this work out with intelligent design?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 11:30:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'S')till wating, VM:

Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?

How did this work out with intelligent design?


Still stuck on those Judaeo-Christian assumptions, eh.

Yuga Cycles.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')inear Versus Cyclic Time
The modern historical scientists' linear concept of time strikingly resembles the traditional Judaeo-Christian concept, and it strikingly differs from that of the ancient Greeks and Indians. The cosmological ideas of several prominent Greek thinkers included a cyclic or episodic time similar to that found in the Vedic literature of India.

For example, we find in Hesiod's Works and Days a series of ages (gold, silver, bronze, heroic, and iron) similar to the Indian yugas (ages). In both systems the quality of human life becomes progressively worse with each passing age. In On Nature, Empedocles speaks of cosmic time cycles. In Plato's dialogues, there are descriptions of revolving time and recurring catastrophes destroying or nearly destroying human civilization. Aristotle said often in his works that the arts and sciences had been discovered many times in the past. In the teachings of Plato, Pythagoras, and Empedocles on the transmigration of the soul, the cyclical pattern extends to individual psycho-physical existence.

When Judaeo-Christian civilization arose in Europe, another understanding of time became prominent -- time going forward in a straight line. Broadly speaking, this concept of time involves a unique act of cosmic creation, a unique appearance of human beings, and a unique history of salvation, culminating in a unique denouement, the last judgment. The drama occurs only once. Individually, the life of a human being mirrors this process; so, with some exceptions, orthodox Christian theologians rejected transmigration of the soul.

Modern historical sciences share the basic Judaeo-Christian assumptions about time. The universe we inhabit is a unique occurrence: Humans arose once on this planet; the history of our ancestors followed a unique though unpredestined evolutionary pathway; and the collapse of the "Big Bang" universe will bring everything to a close.

One is tempted to propose that the modern account of human evolution is a Judaeo-Christian heresy that covertly retains fundamental structures of Judaeo-Christian cosmology, eschatology, and salvation history while overtly dispensing with the scriptural account of divine intervention in the origin of species, including our own.

vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 19 Jun 2009, 21:33:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'S')till wating, VM:

Ok, then God had to start over as someone kicked over his sand castle, right?

And this time, he didn't rebuild. He drew new plans, right?

How did this work out with intelligent design?


Still stuck on those Judaeo-Christian assumptions, eh.


Has nothing to do with any religion. Sorry if my general use of God confuses you.

If the designer of the intelligent design got his sand castle kicked over by a cosmic event, why didn't he rebuild it to his original design rather than start over?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby lper100km » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 00:37:24

Most religions hold that god is omnipotent and omniscient. That being the case and ignoring for the moment as to how, who or what created god, one could reasonably expect that the created universe would be perfect in all respects. How could it not be? There would be no reason for modification or change. In fact there are allusions to that thought in the Christian theology – world without end, changeless universe etc.

The fact is that the universe and this world are chaotic around the edges, though science has produced vast evidence of a highly ordered foundation. It seems to me that it is in the chaotic margins that biology and particle physics flourish. Nothing stays the same for very long there. Is it intelligent to allow chaos? How can one design chaos? Chaos is the antithesis of order. Order does not allow for variation. Design, intelligent or otherwise, requires order.

So did god make an error? Or was this a plan?

If god made an error, then it’s not quite as smart as we could wish for.

If it was a plan to allow for endless adaptation, then what’s the point, especially when it has been shown that eventually, the universe will end up as a cold, lifeless mass? A cosmic joke, though few will hear the punchline.

Of course, if there is no god, then it’s another big why? (which in itself does not prove that god has to exist, or prove anything, for that matter)

It all reduces to an insoluble set of propositions. They may be interesting to discuss as an intellectual exercise, but hardly worth getting excited about. The problem is that people do get excited about them, often with tragic consequences.
User avatar
lper100km
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Over the tracks, left under the overpass, right, third boxcar on the left, ask for Jack

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 00:45:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')f the designer of the intelligent design got his sand castle kicked over by a cosmic event, why didn't he rebuild it to his original design rather than start over?


Fun.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 00:57:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', ' ')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o one, even God, can see the future, nor anticipate it to the degree required..


I disagree with this entirely. No one bound within the frame of our space-time can see the future. God is not so bound.


I rest my case. It then follows then no living thing has any free will or thoughts or actions.
There is no purpose in life. It's all a script.


You may rest it; but it is found wanting.
Badly.

Still, it is an acceptable resolution. If you are left with being unable to reconcile free will with the notion of a divinity able to observe all places and times at any instant; that doesn't refute the notion that an intelligent design concept can in fact reconcile perfectly well with natural selection and the origin of species.

I suffer no such difficulty with regard to free will and a deity able to view the choice that I make tomorrow. The choice remains mine, the fact that I experience it sequentially in time, and the deity experiences it instantaneously with all other actions and choices; bothers me not one bit.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 01:05:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'G')od wiped out the dinosaurs with a meteor so he could redesign creation? Or a meteor changed the environment that then gave rise to mammals which lead to us?


Stipulating the meteor / dinosaur thing...

1.) The wiping out of the dinosaurs did not enable a redesign of creation, there have been numerous mass extinctions resulting from various events... They aren't enablers of redesign; they are the design.

2.) Thus, the meteor did change the environment, that gave rise to the primacy of mammals, which has lead to us.

It is also, reasonable to assume, that there will be many more mass extinctions on this planet in the ages to come; long after we are gone, and God is enjoying the presence and experience of some other form of life.

We're just a blip. A momentary pinnacle; maybe to be exceeded in the future, maybe not.

Only God knows.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 08:57:07

vision-master
 

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 20 Jun 2009, 10:54:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lper100km', ' ') The fact is that the universe and this world are chaotic around the edges, though science has produced vast evidence of a highly ordered foundation. It seems to me that it is in the chaotic margins that biology and particle physics flourish. Nothing stays the same for very long there. Is it intelligent to allow chaos? How can one design chaos? Chaos is the antithesis of order. Order does not allow for variation. Design, intelligent or otherwise, requires order.


Yes, it cannot be done on the spin of a roulette wheel. Good post.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron