Peak Oil
Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design: Who's Right?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.
Post a reply

Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design: Who's Right?

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:26:55

Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (58 min long...) :)
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby Jotapay » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:28:22

The ironic thing is that people who are in the "Intelligent Design" camp usually wind up being Darwin Award candidates. :)
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:31:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'T')he ironic thing is that people who are in the "Intelligent Design" camp usually wind up being Darwin Award candidates. :)



Sounds like Darwin got some things right. :roll:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby AgentR » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:39:31

The real, honest question is.. What does this "intelligent design" bring to the table as a useful and functional scientific theory?

As far as I can tell... nada.

I have a hypothesis too; its called, "I believe a tall woman added the dye to the plastic bead mixture that was used to form the case of the UPS attached to my workstation." Could be true, you never know. Does it matter? nope. But hey, evidence or no, I'll call it the Great Bead Theory,,,, and you all best believe or I'll put toothpaste in your hair! BLUE even! grrr!

If some person out there, with a younger faith perhaps, feels the need to reconcile evolutionary biology with divine creation, there's a simpler, more reasonable way to do so. Biological evolution sites random chance as cause for occasional genetic changes that lead to diversification and eventually giving rise to new species as the ability to interbreed is lost. "Finger of God" is just as good as "random chance" in that capacity; doesn't really make any difference. Changes in DNA are observed over time, thats all thats really important there.

Waste of time, if you ask me; but no reason to ditch good science or good religion over.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby mos6507 » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:50:53

Evolution. Next question?
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 09:58:53

Image

Missing link to my dog? :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:13:09

Evolution is driven by random genetic mutations.

No "intelligent design" can be based upon a roulette wheel of chance.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:16:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')volution is driven by random genetic mutations.

No "intelligent design" can be based upon a roulette wheel of chance.


So, who's right?

What's the truth. :)
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby Jotapay » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:24:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')volution is driven by random genetic mutations.


Actually, random genetic mutations that are favored by natural selection in a favorable environmental niche. The mutated organism must reach reproductive age and produce viable offspring for evolution to occur.

Last edited by Jotapay on Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:25 am, edited one meelion times in total.
Last edited by Jotapay on Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:26:31, edited 2 times in total.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby Jotapay » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:25:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'S')o, who's right?

What's the truth. :)


Natural selection is extremely simple to prove. Didn't you see the "black-white moth in dirty European cities" example in your 9th grade Biology textbook?
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby mos6507 » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:30:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '
')So, who's right?

What's the truth. :)


I know you want to figure this out, but I don't think your brain is capable of determining truth from superstition. Your brain is kind of stuck in "open minded" mode. You never seem to filter out the crackpottery. You really seem kind of obssessed with discovering new theories and less interested in determining whether there is any validity to them. The fact that you've double-backed and reposted some of your "finds" like the Dropa stones shows this phenomenon in action. You don't really work with these theories long enough or dig deep enough to even remember that you've already gone over the same territory before. It's like rummaging through the library and only reading the back covers. It's ADD, man.
Last edited by mos6507 on Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:35:35, edited 1 time in total.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby Jotapay » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:32:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '
')So, who's right?

What's the truth. :)


I know you want to figure this out, but I don't think your brain is capable of determining truth from superstition. Your brain is kind of stuck in "open minded" mode. You never seem to filter out the crackpottery.


In elementary school, were your teachers always telling you to mind your own business and quit tattling on the other students? You sure like to get in other people's junk.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:34:29

So, you didn't bother to watch the video, eh?
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:44:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')volution is driven by random genetic mutations.

No "intelligent design" can be based upon a roulette wheel of chance.



This ain't random.

Image
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he next time you look at a sunflower, take the trouble to look at the arrangement of the seeds. They appear to be spiralling outwards both to the left and the right. There are a Fibonacci number of spirals! It seems that this arrangement keeps the seeds uniformly packed no matter how large the seed head.


Image
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233...................
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby AgentR » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:46:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')volution is driven by random genetic mutations.
No "intelligent design" can be based upon a roulette wheel of chance.


Sure it can. You just don't like the implications.

Besides, its just a comfortable ruse; I have absolutely no trouble with evolution as is; nor do most scientists with strong religious faiths. But Joe Average can easily be lead astray either against science or against religion by people with ulterior motives because they think religious principles can tell us something particularly useful about biology, or because they think biology tells us something useful about religious principles; an issue settled centuries ago as a pointless waste of time.

Doesn't help much against the idgits who want to use such issues to cause people to hate science or hate religion sadly enough.

nb... The randomness is only demonstratable to an apparent level; in the context of an infinite and omniscient deity; the scale of the asserted source makes the sample size inadequate.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 10:52:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')volution is driven by random genetic mutations.
No "intelligent design" can be based upon a roulette wheel of chance.


Sure it can. You just don't like the implications.

Besides, its just a comfortable ruse; I have absolutely no trouble with evolution as is; nor do most scientists with strong religious faiths. But Joe Average can easily be lead astray either against science or against religion by people with ulterior motives because they think religious principles can tell us something particularly useful about biology, or because they think biology tells us something useful about religious principles; an issue settled centuries ago as a pointless waste of time.

Doesn't help much against the idgits who want to use such issues to cause people to hate science or hate religion sadly enough.

nb... The randomness is only demonstratable to an apparent level; in the context of an infinite and omniscient deity; the scale of the asserted source makes the sample size inadequate.


Image
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Dogon people of Mali, West Africa, are famous for their unique art and advanced cosmology. The Dogon’s creation story describes how the one true god, Amma, created all the matter of the universe. Interestingly, the myths that depict his creative efforts bear a striking resemblance to the modern scientific definitions of matter, beginning with the atom and continuing all the way to the vibrating threads of string theory. Furthermore, many of the Dogon words, symbols, and rituals used to describe the structure of matter are quite similar to those found in the myths of ancient Egypt and in the daily rituals of Judaism. For example, the modern scientific depiction of the informed universe as a black hole is identical to Amma’s Egg of the Dogon and the Egyptian Benben Stone.

The Science of the Dogon offers a case-by-case comparison of Dogon descriptions and drawings to corresponding scientific definitions and diagrams from authors like Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene, then extends this analysis to the counterparts of these symbols in both the ancient Egyptian and Hebrew religions. What is ultimately revealed is the scientific basis for the language of the Egyptian hieroglyphs, which was deliberately encoded to prevent the knowledge of these concepts from falling into the hands of all but the highest members of the Egyptian priesthood. The Science of the Dogon also offers compelling new interpretations for many of the most familiar Egyptian symbols, such as the pyramid and the scarab, and presents new explanations for the origins of religiously charged words such as Jehovah and Satan.
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby outcast » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 11:13:16

Image
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby vision-master » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 11:17:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('outcast', '[')img]http://api.ning.com/files/GkcexZAd661bEDtfZKYxyZHmdJ4B87LEcKF07971mwkiTlnoYqbsYhfliRr9yy2CYDZIuDRo6pyb2JnNABB1wzHsoWR4RdJp/Creationismsmall.jpg[/img]


Maybe like 3,500 BCE. :)

Then again, what do we know about human hisStory before the Deluge?
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby green_achers » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 12:14:38

Who has 58 minutes to watch another pointless debate on a subject like this?
User avatar
green_achers
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Mississippi Delta
Top

Re: Darwins Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (Who's Right?)

Postby ian807 » Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:12:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('green_achers', 'W')ho has 58 minutes to watch another pointless debate on a subject like this?


The kind of people who don't work.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top
Next
Post a reply

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



cron