by Sixstrings » Mon 01 Jun 2009, 16:12:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schmuto', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schmuto', 'M')y experience in life has been that women are, with few exceptions, horrible communicators.
They typically believe that you should be able to read their minds.
Women are not "horrible communicators." If fact, our species has evolved so that females communicate MUCH more than men. According to studies on this, the average woman says 20,000 words per day, compared to 7,000 for the average man.
You must be a woman.
You have just equated "talking a lot" with "being a good communicator."
Completely different things.
In fact, being a good communicator means using a few words as possible to communicate the thought.
This is why I loved Dr. Laura so much:
Woman Caller - "Well Dr. Laura, I'm unhappy with my husband because he says things to me that are hurtful."
Dr. L - "Like what?"
WC- "Well, you know, just things."
[Already a classic at this point]
Dr. L - "No dear, don't tell me things. What
exactly does he say."
WC - [more ambiguous chatter]
Dr. L - "One more chance, then I have to let you go - give me a specific example."
WC - "He told me my butt had gotten a lot bigger since we got married."
Dr. L - "Well, has it?"
dead silence for 10 seconds then the WC rambling about how that is not relevant to her question.
Hilarious!
Men, of course, can be poor communicators, but don't confuse their general dislike of rambling on incessantly about every emotional pang they have as equivalent to bad communication.
Anybody who has worked for both women and men understand this.
Classic moment in my life - asked by female boss why I didn't do project X for 3 months I replied - "because I had 12 other projects, project X looked like a crappy project to work on, and, after giving it to me, I didn't hear a word back from you about it, which I took to mean it was low priority."
The look on her face was priceless.
I'm not a woman, I just understand them pretty well. You're all over me like white on rice for supposedly taking the girls' side here, when in fact I'm just being objective.
I didn't say women communicate "better," I said they're not "horrible" at it -- they are just different. My point is a valid one, and backed up by scientific research.
Why are so many men hellbent on expecting women to behave like men, and conversely, women want to emasculate the men of the world?
Men and women are fundamentally different -- that's not a judgement, just a fact.
by Ludi » Tue 02 Jun 2009, 12:28:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schmuto', 'M')y experience in life has been that women are, with few exceptions, horrible communicators.
They typically believe that you should be able to read their minds.
I am asking people to
stop trying to read my mind. I am asking for people not to try to figure out what I might be "implying" with my posts. I would like them to ask me.
Example that drove me from the board (except for this thread):
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', ' ')
Definition = Erratic retaliation is a kinder, gentler warfare.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'H')ardly. Just not "unlimited." And certainly not as damaging to ecosystems as our version.
Just want to make it clear here I'm not advocating we return to erratic retaliation. For one thing, very few of us live in bands/tribes.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', ' ')
So if we pull a 12-monkeys and wipe out humans without firing a shot or bending a single blade of grass, that would be okay?