Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Homeless Hooverville Tent City Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Ayoob » Sat 16 May 2009, 15:45:33

Sounds like it's a good time to set up a new American colony. How about one in Iraq, one in Afghanistan, one in Venezuela, one in Zimbabwe, and another one in South Africa.

The homeless, anyone doing life in prison, drug addicts, the homeless, the poor, the handicapped, the feebleminded, and the Jews. With a mere handful of Jews in the mix I would imagine any colony would be wildly successful in a very short period of time. Those would be your "seed" Jews, with more to join as the financial opportunities arose.

Anyway.

Let the colonists ("immigrants") know that they won't be prosecuted for anything they do to clear the land for American expansion. Once we have new farms going, new energy resources to harness, and a little more liebensraum to spread ourselves around in, things should be good.

Would anyone like more organic bananas?
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 16 May 2009, 15:49:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '
')IMO, the least expensive way to address this(on part of the taxpayer) would be to not bail out the banks at all, forcibly get rid of property tax collection(so that people can afford a place to live even with no job), outlaw states and municipals from passing anti-vagrancy laws(with plenty of statements from the U.S. constitution to back it up), and whatever homes are foreclosed on and owned by a bank that in such a scenario would be out of business should be given away to people who are homeless, for free, preferably to the person who previously occupied it. There's more than enough viable homes to go around for everyone who doesn't have one and which wants or needs one.



Looks like a good plan.

Communities wouldn't like it though because they would lose their tax base if you get rid of property taxes.
Ludi
 

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 16 May 2009, 15:57:08

Image

Sounds good
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Grautr » Sat 16 May 2009, 16:27:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'A') lot of the "homeless" in tent cities are alchoholics, drug addicts, and the mentally ill. They set up their "tent cities" near cities because they want to score drugs, panhandle, and get free food and other services from governmental and religious social service agencies-----they couldn't do that as easily at remote highway rest stops.



And those people who lost jobs and homes but didnt have family to suport them could not find work to get back on their feet if they are in a tent in the middle of nowhere. Slums (tent cities are just modern slums) grow with cities because people need the work.
User avatar
Grautr
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Maastricht, the Netherlands

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Grautr » Sat 16 May 2009, 16:36:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'P')eople who live in their cars are often wrongfully searched and/or harassed by law enforcement or told to move elsewhere(where the cycle will be repeated). People who live in tents(as they are in these tent cities) are repeatedly removed by force because many communities don't want them nearby. People who squat in abandoned buildings are often forcibly removed by law enforcement for "trespassing". The U.S. also has many anti-vagrancy laws that effictively make homelessness a jailable offense. I suppose they could stay in shelters where they will likely have most of their possessions stolen and don't even have a garauntee of a bed(many are only given a chair to sit in).

IMO, the least expensive way to address this(on part of the taxpayer) would be to not bail out the banks at all, forcibly get rid of property tax collection(so that people can afford a place to live even with no job), outlaw states and municipals from passing anti-vagrancy laws(with plenty of statements from the U.S. constitution to back it up), and whatever homes are foreclosed on and owned by a bank that in such a scenario would be out of business should be given away to people who are homeless, for free, preferably to the person who previously occupied it. There's more than enough viable homes to go around for everyone who doesn't have one and which wants or needs one.



They built a new block of flats near me and the appartments are up for rent from 1000 to 1500 Euros per month which is quite expensive. A few well off people moved in but a majority of the places remained empty.
The housing association has now started to move in students, they say are there to prevent the flats being squated, for 150 Euros per month. Naturaly the full paying tenants are livid and some are now thinking of moving out.

If your going to move people into empty houses the people living nearby who are up to their necks with mortgages will resent it. I would think it would also be an insentive for some to stop paying their own mortgage and see if they can get some cheap accomodation as well.
User avatar
Grautr
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu 09 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Maastricht, the Netherlands

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Jack » Sat 16 May 2009, 16:38:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '
')Yes, I think that's a fantastic idea, but not at the rest stops. It would be too difficult to administer to all of those places...I guess we could call them "camps" if they are all spread out like that. They should be all in one or two places...concentrated, if you will. You know, to make it easier to manage.


Excellent idea! They could be fed a healthy standard diet and given suitable education as needed. Factories might be built within the facilities, thus providing the human resources inside with productive work to occupy their time and giving industry a source of inexpensive labor, thus enhancing our competitiveness versus China. Of course, suitable deductions from the paychecks would help run the camp on a fiscally sound basis.

If and when the economy improved, and those inside the facilities accomplished certain goals, along with saving a suitable sum, they could always leave. The opportunity to work toward independence would surely inspire. Perhaps it could even be the facility slogan, posted over the front gates.

8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 16 May 2009, 17:01:29

Image
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 16 May 2009, 17:27:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grautr', 'I') would think it would also be an insentive for some to stop paying their own mortgage and see if they can get some cheap accomodation as well.



Some maybe, but probably not that many. It's kind of like welfare being an incentive for some people to stop working and get free stuff like food stamps. Not a very large percentage of the population have such low self-esteem and lack of pride (even in this lackluster day and age) to deliberately become deadbeats and losers in order to get free stuff.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Novus » Sat 16 May 2009, 18:35:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '[')img]http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/5738/jackss.jpg[/img]


I am pretty sure the homeless in tent cities will in end up in FEMA camps before too much longer. They are just waiting for the public to turn blind eye to it and look the other way.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 16 May 2009, 18:39:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '
')
I am pretty sure the homeless in tent cities will in end up in FEMA camps before too much longer. They are just waiting for the public to turn blind eye to it and look the other way.



Why are They "waiting"? Not that many people care about the homeless. Many would just as soon they conveniently disappeared somewhere. Isn't that what people really want - for the alcoholics, drug addicts, and the mentally ill to just conveniently disappear?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 16 May 2009, 18:51:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'T')his isn't the first thread on the homeless & tent cities, but a thought popped into my mellon...Why not let the homeless set up camp at rest-stops along the highway?

Rest stops have bathrooms, showers, & drinking water. They have alot of land to pitch tents & most even have a place to "walk" your pet. They're away from large population centers. Big empty parking lots incase you're sleeping in your car as opposed to a tent. We could even add a few inexpensive fire rings for camp fires.

Even if this prevented most people from stopping at a rest stop, it would be a small price to pay in order to give these homeless people a place to set-up & not be hasseled & "moved on".

Good idea? Bad idea? Discuss...


Uhm... no.

In Florida at least, rest stops are intended for use by tourists and other tired drivers. I think too many folks would be scared off by the homeless presence and would just keep driving, which would make the highways more dangerous and defeat the purpose of rest stops.

What we need in this country is REAL public housing and European-style social services.

Now, I admit that if the Great Financial Crash happens, then neither Europe nor the US will be able to afford such services. But if things get THAT bad, then it's game over on a lot of stuff anyway.

I think what's more likely is that TETWAWKI won't happen, and the world will muddle on, and we'll still have folks sleeping on streets while in Britian they get a council house.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 16 May 2009, 19:02:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')we'll still have folks sleeping on streets while in Britian they get a council house.


Except in Britain the homeless are sleeping on the streets too.

Britain's homeless children cry out for help and dignity ---wish they were in American where the homeless get welfare and housing vouchers

Nope...give the homeless vouchers to stay in luxury hotels. And give them debit cards to use the room service for meals when their welfare agency caseworkers come over to visit. Thats the ultimate solution to this problem.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 16 May 2009, 19:13:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')we'll still have folks sleeping on streets while in Britian they get a council house.


Except in Britain the homeless are sleeping on the streets too.

Britain's homeless children cry out for help and dignity ---wish they were in American where the homeless get welfare and housing vouchers

Nope...give the homeless vouchers to stay in luxury hotels. And give them debit cards to use the room service for meals when their welfare agency caseworkers come over to visit. Thats the ultimate solution to this problem.


Ok, I read that article and the family of every child mentioned has been set up in housing. Not one of them is on the street. As sensationalist as the British press is (putting those kids on a couch outside in the snow, please).. they couldn't find a single kid living on the streets to profile.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 16 May 2009, 19:44:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')we'll still have folks sleeping on streets while in Britian they get a council house.


Except in Britain the homeless are sleeping on the streets too.

Britain's homeless children cry out for help and dignity ---wish they were in American where the homeless get welfare and housing vouchers

Nope...give the homeless vouchers to stay in luxury hotels. And give them debit cards to use the room service for meals when their welfare agency caseworkers come over to visit. Thats the ultimate solution to this problem.


Ok, I read that article and the family of every child mentioned has been set up in housing. Not one of them is on the street.


From the article linked above:

Amanda says: “I see people with children living under the bridges and I think at least I have a roof, I have a bed, a kitchen, my brother, my dad...."

People with children in England who are living under bridges are living on the streets. :roll:
Last edited by Plantagenet on Sat 16 May 2009, 19:58:02, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 16 May 2009, 19:49:51

Here is a YouTube interview with a homeless nurse in London who is living on the streets.

homeless nurse living on the streets of London

Surely an actual interview with a homeless person in Britain is sufficient to demonstrate that there are obviously ARE homeless people in Britain?

If not, there are interviews with lots of other homeless british people on the same youtube page the link brings you to.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 16 May 2009, 21:06:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'H')ere is a YouTube interview with a homeless nurse in London who is living on the streets.

homeless nurse living on the streets of London

Surely an actual interview with a homeless person in Britain is sufficient to demonstrate that there are obviously ARE homeless people in Britain?

If not, there are interviews with lots of other homeless british people on the same youtube page the link brings you to.


Ok, I watched the vids.. they interview two homeless people. My only comment is that it's interesting that they both claim they can't get help because they don't have any "problems," such as addiction or mental illness. So I dunno, that seems a step up from the homeless situation in the US. The homeless here complain that there's just no help at all, not that there's only help for the addicted / ill homeless.

Of course I know there are some people living on the streets in the UK, but my hunch is that overall it's far less by percentage than what we have here in the US.

I mean for Pete's sake, do you ever hear about tent cities being shut down in the UK? No, you don't -- because Britain doesn't have tent cities.

To sum up, this debate is going in circles. We can both throw up anecdotal evidence that isn't really conclusive. If anyone happens to have a link to some real data that compares homelessness in the US as a percentage of the population compared to European countries, I'd be interested in seeing it.

My definition of homelessness, by the way, is living on the street. I think Britain counts those in emergency housing as homeless, but what I'm interested in is whether western European nations have anywhere near the numbers of people actually sleeping on the street as we do.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 16 May 2009, 22:05:42

The Homeless Front UK ([b]HFUK) is a collective of homeless Londoners who seek to create a tent city [/b]as a sanctuary for themselves and for other Londoners without shelter. The ‘tent city’ they envisage will be drug and alcohol free; a safe and secure place where homeless people can live while they seek work and make the transition to more permanent housing. This model provides the dispossessed with the sense that they have a home, which the common urban practice of government- or charity-provided overnight shelter for the homeless does not.
In the UK there are an estimated 400,000 ‘hidden homeless’ without a roof over their heads[2]. In December 2006 the Homeless Front UK initiated its Out of the Doorways Campaign to empower and house some of these. As of December 15, 2006, the nascent HFUK has so far housed 11 of London’s ‘rough sleepers’.
By spearheading the creation of Dignity Village between 2000 and 2004, Jack Tafari pioneered the concept of the sanctioned tent city in Portland, Oregon. Now Tafari and his group want to “replicate dignity” in London, creating a flagship, eco-friendly tent city as a model for other UK cities where homelessness is a problem.

Brit homeless wish they could duplicated tent cities for homeless found in the USA

The HFUK knows rather more about the homeless issue in the UK then either of us, I suspect. The HFUK is rather sure that there are homeless people in the UK.
-------------


Bottomline---Its silly to pretend that the UK doesn't have any homeless people. Not only does the UK have homeless people, but homeless activists like those in the HFUK would like to see tent cities established in the UK similar to those in the USA as they think the tent provides a sense of "home" for the homeless person that is missing in the government and charity shelters.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 17 May 2009, 03:50:09

Image
From your link.. that's a pic of Jack Tafari, rastafarian, homeless activist, and leader of the Homeless Front of the UK.

I'm sorry Plant, every one of these Brit examples you bring out really strike me as enjoying street life just a BIT too much. It's like it's a lifestyle choice with these people. I know the economy is in the tank, but honestly.. if you've got the energy to start a world-wide activist movement, then you've got the energy to get a haircut and find a paying job *somewhere*.

Let's not forget that in Europe there's a whole segment of people who are "squatters," and are more like anarchists than the kind of homeless we have in the US.

Anyway, I congratulate you Plant on countering every point I make. But we're still both just singing in the wind here from the other side of a big pond. It would be good to hear from some of our Brit posters.. from their viewpoint, actually living in Britain, what's their assessment of real street-living homelessness in their country?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Prince » Sun 17 May 2009, 05:53:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'N')ow, I admit that if the Great Financial Crash happens, then neither Europe nor the US will be able to afford such services. But if things get THAT bad, then it's game over on a lot of stuff anyway.


What makes you think we can afford if there is no "Great Financial Crash"? Oh right... we can't. Take away the bailouts from 8 months ago and rewind the clock, and we still can't afford this massive socialism. The primary reason we got in this mess is due to government intervention.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hy are They "waiting"? Not that many people care about the homeless. Many would just as soon they conveniently disappeared somewhere. Isn't that what people really want - for the alcoholics, drug addicts, and the mentally ill to just conveniently disappear?


Why don't you tell us where you live, since you care so much about the homeless? How much time and energy do you spend with the homeless? For someone who cares so much about the welfare of other people, you sure spend a lot of time on here.
User avatar
Prince
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon 26 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: What To Do With Tent Cities

Unread postby Prince » Sun 17 May 2009, 06:17:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'P')eople who live in their cars are often wrongfully searched and/or harassed by law enforcement or told to move elsewhere(where the cycle will be repeated). People who live in tents(as they are in these tent cities) are repeatedly removed by force because many communities don't want them nearby. People who squat in abandoned buildings are often forcibly removed by law enforcement for "trespassing".


It has been well-documented that tent cities bring more than just innocent homeless people with them. Drug and alcohol use in an area increases significantly, which in turn has a domino effect that brings in the drug dealers and gang-bangers looking to make a buck. Petty crime (car prowlers, burglaries, assault, theft) rise by as much as 50%. Pollution also goes up atrociously as these people don't care to respect the living space and confines of those around them. Couple these with the fact that many homeless are mentally ill and disproportionately have a history of child abuse and sexual misconduct, and it is very obvious why people don't want this crap in their neighborhood.

I know you mean well and you have some valid, idealistic points, but for every nice homeless person you meet, there are 30 that would better serve society as fertilizer. Here's something I always ask... where are these people's family? Surely, everyone has *some* family. Okay, maybe not everyone, but let's say 90%. Ninety percent of these people have some family they could fall back on; maybe get a room or have them help them with life as they get back on their feet... and yet the family doesn't want them around. Why is that? My guess is for the reasons cited above--history of drug/alcohol abuse, violence, mental illness, sexual deviancy, fiscally irresponsible, unmotivated to work, etc.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'I')MO, the least expensive way to address this(on part of the taxpayer) would be to not bail out the banks at all, forcibly get rid of property tax collection(so that people can afford a place to live even with no job), outlaw states and municipals from passing anti-vagrancy laws(with plenty of statements from the U.S. constitution to back it up)...


The least expensive way would have been to spend no additional money at all. Spending $2T you don't have on some other interest doesn't change the fact that you didn't have the money to spend in the first place. Besides, the taxpayer already contributes enough of his wallet to socialism. On average, 90 minutes of your 8-hour workday is spent funding social programs. That's a lot.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'a')nd whatever homes are foreclosed on and owned by a bank that in such a scenario would be out of business should be given away to people who are homeless, for free, preferably to the person who previously occupied it. There's more than enough viable homes to go around for everyone who doesn't have one and which wants or needs one.


Ah, yes... tell you what. Why don't you dig around a bit and research the damage caused by human scum post-Hurricane Katrina who absolutely destroyed nice hotel rooms and didn't have respect for anything because things were free. There is no incentive for people to work when things are free, nor is there any reason for them to have any interest or responsibility to upkeep the property or treat it with a smidgen of respect. Look at cities or neighborhoods like Detroit, Newark, or south Chicago if you need any more examples of how quickly an area will go downhill when it becomes a welfare state.
User avatar
Prince
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon 26 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron