by lorenzo » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:43:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '(')a) Stop promoting us as Baby Machines
Since when is making babies in a context of love, loyalty, and spirituality anything mechanical?
I would argue the contrary. Your free sex is part of a bigger context. And that context is one of pure utilitarianism. Your idea of free sex leads to women seeing themselves as mere sex machines, as objects having no function but to orgasm so that the day after this meaningless act, they are more ready to waste their life as docile subjects of an utilitarian society.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'a')llow us to enjoy sex by encouraging the use of contraception and safe sex.
To enjoy. Countless sexological research reports show that women enjoy sex more when it is embedded in a context of a loving and meaningful relationship. The Church offers an entire program that guarantees you can enjoy sex in such a loving and meaningful context.
Women don't like to be treated as mechanical sex puppets. With your argument, you're indeed giving a lot of credit to the Church's teachings.
About contraception. We've had that discussion already. The Catholic Church is the only institution on the planet that defends safe sex. It is also the only one on the planet whose safe-sex program
works 100% all of the time.
Marriage, loyalty and abstinence have never failed to work. Condoms fail continuously. The pill is a joke, countless women get pregnant by taking the pill, and it destroys hormonal balance. Moreover, it fits in an ideology of individualism, self-determinacy and consumerist shallowness. I just don't think this ideology offers anything valuable.
To me, the Church is the champion advocate of healthy, sane, meaningful and safe sex.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')(b) Allow women to be priests.
That's a strange idea. If tomorrow your husband tells you he absolutely wants to carry babies in a womb he doesn't have, and he accuses you of being responsible for the fact that he can't carry babies because he is a man - what will you do? You will be stupified. You will find his reasoning totally irrational.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'T')here is a difference between a Leap of Faith and Blind Faith. The former shows courage, the latter cowardice.
I agree, and there is a difference between throwing your entire doctrine away because fashion and atheists want you to yield to modernity without asking any questions, - and gently keeping the value of your doctrine, coming out for your identity and pointing people to the wisdom of the Church's teachings.
The former shows cowardice, shallowness and lack of character, the latter shows courage.