Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pope Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby lorenzo » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:43:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '(')a) Stop promoting us as Baby Machines


Since when is making babies in a context of love, loyalty, and spirituality anything mechanical?

I would argue the contrary. Your free sex is part of a bigger context. And that context is one of pure utilitarianism. Your idea of free sex leads to women seeing themselves as mere sex machines, as objects having no function but to orgasm so that the day after this meaningless act, they are more ready to waste their life as docile subjects of an utilitarian society.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'a')llow us to enjoy sex by encouraging the use of contraception and safe sex.


To enjoy. Countless sexological research reports show that women enjoy sex more when it is embedded in a context of a loving and meaningful relationship. The Church offers an entire program that guarantees you can enjoy sex in such a loving and meaningful context.
Women don't like to be treated as mechanical sex puppets. With your argument, you're indeed giving a lot of credit to the Church's teachings.


About contraception. We've had that discussion already. The Catholic Church is the only institution on the planet that defends safe sex. It is also the only one on the planet whose safe-sex program works 100% all of the time.
Marriage, loyalty and abstinence have never failed to work. Condoms fail continuously. The pill is a joke, countless women get pregnant by taking the pill, and it destroys hormonal balance. Moreover, it fits in an ideology of individualism, self-determinacy and consumerist shallowness. I just don't think this ideology offers anything valuable.

To me, the Church is the champion advocate of healthy, sane, meaningful and safe sex.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')(b) Allow women to be priests.


That's a strange idea. If tomorrow your husband tells you he absolutely wants to carry babies in a womb he doesn't have, and he accuses you of being responsible for the fact that he can't carry babies because he is a man - what will you do? You will be stupified. You will find his reasoning totally irrational.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'T')here is a difference between a Leap of Faith and Blind Faith. The former shows courage, the latter cowardice.


I agree, and there is a difference between throwing your entire doctrine away because fashion and atheists want you to yield to modernity without asking any questions, - and gently keeping the value of your doctrine, coming out for your identity and pointing people to the wisdom of the Church's teachings.

The former shows cowardice, shallowness and lack of character, the latter shows courage.
Last edited by lorenzo on Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:57:51, edited 2 times in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby threadbear » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:45:41

Not only does the church champion women's rights, it has a largely pedophile clergy that provides a first rate, hands on sex education to minors. It has been a haven for pedophiles when everyone else turned their backs on them. Very compassionate.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby khebab » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:47:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'B')ut the line only refers to the Jesuit's adagium: "plus est en vous" (there's more in you than you think). When one says "all free people are Catholics and only Catholics are free" it basically means that in every person hides a Catholic waiting to get out. It's just a matter of gently pulling. Pope Benedict XVI will do just that.

you mean gently brainwashing!
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Postby khebab » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:48:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'N')ot only does the church champion women's rights, it has a largely pedophile clergy that provides a first rate, hands on sex education to minors. It has been a haven for pedophiles when everyone else turned their backs on them. Very compassionate.

You're right, notice how Lorenzo avoid to talk about this very sensitive subject!
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Postby lorenzo » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 12:55:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', '
')You're right, notice how Lorenzo avoid to talk about this very sensitive subject!


I am willing to discuss this, but in another thread.

Catholics are obviously more rational and have better debating skills. That's why I ask you to stick to the topic at hand, and don't jump around like a schizo. The topic here is: why the Pope is the sole defendor of women. If you want to open a thread about the incidence of pedophilia in society, then go ahead.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby khebab » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 13:03:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
')The Catholic Church is the only institution on the planet that defends safe sex. It is also the only one on the planet whose safe-sex program works 100% all of the time.

Yeah! that's right safe sex with children! :-D

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', ' ')Condoms fail continuously.

Come on Lorenzo! it's your lack of practice! 20 years I'am using condoms, never had a problem!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
') The pill is a joke, countless women get pregnant by taking the pill, and it destroys hormonal balance.

yes, if your doctor is a moron.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
')Moreover, it fits in an ideology of individualism, self-determinacy and consumerist shallowness. I just don't think this ideology offers anything valuable.

No, it's called being in control, having too many children and not be able to take care of them is the true crime!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
')(b) Allow women to be priests.

That's a strange idea. If tomorrow your husband tells you he absolutely wants to carry babies in a womb he doesn't have, and he accuses you of being responsible for the fact that he can't carry babies because he is a man - what will you do? You will be stupified. You will find his reasoning totally irrational.

Old patriarchal religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) use the same old tricks, they put the men in charge and oppress women. That's why these religions are so popular and religious extremists, like yourself, are male.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('American feminist Rosemary Ruether', '')The male is taken to be the normative representative of the human species, the norm for imaging God and for defining anthropology, sin, redemption and ministry.’ The female, in contrast, is seen as ‘subordinate and auxiliary to the male. Women never appear in patriarchal theology as representatives of humanity as such. Their normative position is that of absence and silence. When patriarchal theology mentions women, it does so to reinforce its definition of their "place" in the system.’
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Postby khebab » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 13:15:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', '
')You're right, notice how Lorenzo avoid to talk about this very sensitive subject!


I am willing to discuss this, but in another thread.

Catholics are obviously more rational and have better debating skills. That's why I ask you to stick to the topic at hand, and don't jump around like a schizo. The topic here is: why the Pope is the sole defendor of women. If you want to open a thread about the incidence of pedophilia in society, then go ahead.

Yes, it is relevant, I'm questioning the credibility of the church on moral issues. I don't understand how priests void of any experience with a woman and tormented by the lack of any healthy sex life could be trusted in educating children, give advice about sexuality and be honest about the true place of women in religion. From my personal experience (my uncle was a priest) most of them are freaks hidding behind religion and constantly fighting their own demons.
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Postby Tonttoro » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 13:21:15

Oh the cognitive dissonance.

Now we all know there are some bad things, and then there are some good things. However the badness or goodness of a thing is not tied to any religious dogma. It is somewhat tied to circumstances and more tied to things it causes between you and others. However as people are tied to their instincts and behaviour, discounting the natural behaviour of people is clearly a stupid thing to do. Of course it is so very nice to tell people what they should do, unfortunately many on't do what they should. Of course people should be adviced to do the right thing, but if the right thing is something most people don't do preaching it is more akin to folly.

Actually there are many bad things waiting to happen and actually happening globally:

- Overpopulation
- Climate change
- Overuse of natural resources (Peak Oil, Loss of arable land, etc.)
- Economic problems

None of these are either problems of faith, or solved with any religious dogma. To claim that Catholicism is the answer is actually stupid.

Now I know I shouldn't participate to a religious debate, because nothing good usually comes out of it.
User avatar
Tonttoro
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Aaron » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 13:46:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'B')ut the line only refers to the Jesuit's adagium: "plus est en vous" (there's more in you than you think). When one says "all free people are Catholics and only Catholics are free" it basically means that in every person hides a Catholic waiting to get out. It's just a matter of gently pulling. Pope Benedict XVI will do just that.


lol!

That's very similar to a favorite movie quote.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')We are here to help the Vietnamese, because inside every gook there is an American trying to get out."

- from the Stanley Kubrick film Full Metal Jacket
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Postby DomusAlbion » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 14:32:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', ' ')I think Rome will get nuked, but I am not sure that there will be a concrete reason why


I've heard a lot of far right whackos advocate nuking Meccah, I suppose because it is considered the center of the Islamic faith. Might not radical Jihadists consider Rome the center of at least the Catholic Church if not all of Christendom? That could be motive enough.

During the height of the Islamic Empire there was a saying amoung the Arab Imperialist that they would "stable their horses in the Vatican".
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale
Top

Postby BiGG » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 14:46:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'T')he only thing that is absurd, bigg is your inability to read ... neither of your url's do ANYTHING to disprove the prophecy.

Ummm, no this would your complete lack of even very basic reading comprehension skills as it sure ain’t rocket science figuring it out how they easily & completely debunk these alleged "prophecies".
What part is giving you so much of a problem, the part showing the prophecies before 1595 CE were “accurate” because they were written after they were supposed to have happened, or all the prophesies that never happened after that date because they are simply vague crocks of crap?
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby BiGG » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 15:10:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', ' ')I think Rome will get nuked, but I am not sure that there will be a concrete reason why
I've heard a lot of far right whackos advocate nuking Meccah, I suppose because it is considered the center of the Islamic faith. Might not radical Jihadists consider Rome the center of at least the Catholic Church if not all of Christendom? That could be motive enough. During the height of the Islamic Empire there was a saying amoung the Arab Imperialist that they would "stable their horses in the Vatican".

Not the same thing, nuking Mecca would screw the Muslims permanently because they are required to make a trip to there at least once in their lifetime. The same is not true for the Catholics having to visit Vatican City.

And no, Vatican City has nothing to do with the rest of the Christians. The rest of the Christian sects don’t believe the same things the Catholics believe like whether the alleged Jesus was the son of the alleged Jewish god or the same guy with a new attitude like the Catholics believe.
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby lorenzo » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 15:50:07

Wasn't Kubrick raised in a very disciplined Jesuit college?

It's interesting that you refer to a war movie. As you may know, the Jesuits are the Army of Christ. War metaphors are in order here.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Phil » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 16:44:08

Anyone who believes that a human being in the past bore "supernatural" ability to predict future events is a contemptible fool.

I haven't read this thread, because I find it ridiculous. But is it possible that whoever chose this new pope did so to seemingly fulfill this so-called prophecy?
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX

Postby threadbear » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 16:45:46

Lorenzo:

To suggest that we open another thread about "pedophilia in society", minimizes the very specific problem that the Roman Catholic church has with it. This one statement of your's alone does much to illuminate your selective vision of the "moral authority" of the church. You are probably representative of many of the blinkered adherants who catch a buzz off gargoyle gazing at their local cathedral, and therefore feel compelled to support the ghouls inside, who are running the show. Can't you find a more decent bunch to get behind? Woops, wrong phrase.

Their actions and covert mis-handling of this issue, sinks much lower than mere criminality. It is a crime not just against human rights and decency, but against the human spirit and soul. It has, at the very least, turned people away from God in droves. The cover-ups have embittered others and driven countless others, who were directly affected, to suicide.

Rather than celebrate this "church", it should be stripped of all of it's assets and it's senior members subject to a Nuremburg style crimes against humanity tribunal.

By statistical odds the new pope would never have reached his position, unimpeded, if he wasn't directly or indirectly involved
in the cover-up of the grotesque. And yet we celebrate this dude. Is the whole world completely crazy?

Ditch consumerism, but don't turn to this sordid pack of archetype manipulating, masters of medievil special effects.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Any Pope related question HERE!

Postby Barbara » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 17:26:16

Why here?
Because I'm the one and only forum member living in Rome, of course! :lol:

Ask away!

PS About that Malachy prophecy, I'm sorry to disappoint you but I'm afraid it's true. The "gloria olivae" means "glory of the olive tree", which is the symbol of Saint Benedict. But also: Benedict 16th was born on April 16, and guess who is the saint of that day? Good guess: saint Benedict.
Again, tha last Pope Benedict, Benedict the 15th, is known as "The peace Pope", because he was the first Pope in history to speak loudly against war (WWI).

I think there's enough for me to dig that bunker...
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 25 Feb 2009, 10:35:32, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Pope Thread.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Postby Ludi » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 17:34:49

Will the Pope officially apologise for being the only Pope who was in the Hitler Youth?

Will he formally revoke the blanket curse put on all unbelievers at the Council of Trent?
Ludi
 

Re: Any Pope related question HERE!

Postby Phil » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 17:44:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Barbara', 'P')S About that Malachy prophecy, I'm sorry to disappoint you but I'm afraid it's true. The "gloria olivae" means "glory of the olive tree", which is the symbol of Saint Benedict. But also: Benedict 16th was born on April 16, and guess who is the saint of that day? Good guess: saint Benedict.
Again, tha last Pope Benedict, Benedict the 15th, is known as "The peace Pope", because he was the first Pope in history to speak loudly against war (WWI).


I really despise superstitious people like the above. Nothing in that paragraph is proof of anything. It's contrived circumstantial evidence.

The morons in the Vatican are probably well aware of this alleged prophecy, and knew they could use it to their benefit in choosing their new leader. They know that superstitious idiots like Barbara lack the critical thinking skills to be unimpressed with such garbage. As an outsider, it seems fairly obvious to me they chose this pope in order to fulfill that prophecy. Why would they choose a guy in his late 70s, with connections to Hitler Youth (yawn), unless it served a compelling interest?
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Postby Barbara » Wed 20 Apr 2005, 17:47:13

You don't obviously know how to recognize ironic (and informative) posts.

An idiot is your sister, dear Phil. And you too, of course.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron