by AgentR » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 10:10:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jasonraymondson', 'N')ormally the people who speak out against psychology are people who were diagnosed with some sort of nutitude but are too narcissistic to accept that they are flawed, so they attack psychology as a coping mechanism.
Huge broad brush you're swishing there, no?
Some people are helped, some people are harmed, some people gain no true benefit or suffer significant harm, yet become dependent upon the meds.
If the class of poor results was miniscule in comparison with the class of those truly helped; then you might have an argument. As it is, the meds are prescribed with such reckless abandon that you'd have a hard time demonstrating that something was generally accomplished more useful that simply making millions of drug dependent young adults.
My personal experience with psychology... two extended family members killed and one modestly helped but rendered lifetime dependent on a host of drugs. So, no, I've not been diagnosed with any particular "nutitude", but I think I have ample reason to be skeptical of the profession in general. Does this imply that all psychiatrists are evil, moneygrubbing, or just too lazy to complete a surgical residency? Not at all. Does it imply that I would insist upon one proving that they were decent and honorable human beings before trusting them with a used toothbrush? Absolutely.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.