Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Lakota way of life

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby paimei01 » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 10:54:06

:(
We are "godless". See the first post of this forum about how indian children were raised. How are we raised ? Something like each on his own, forming his own values, mostly "no values" because there is nothing to value in this society.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 12:24:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') notice many Europeans love to romanticise about Indians (Native Americans)


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tudies of ancient camp sites and grave sites show that the Ave. life span of N.American native people was 35-40 years


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')ttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071024135133AAMO0Vo

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')That is the plight of Lakota People living on reservations in South Dakota.

* Life Expectancy is 48 years for men and 52 years for women.
* Unemployment is estimated to be 87%
* 90% live below the Federal poverty level.
* The teenage suicide rate is 3 1/2 times higher than the national average.
* Infant mortality is five times higher than the national average
* Diabetes, heart disease, cancer and malnutrition are epidemic.


http://nativeprogress.org/content/view/35/39/

We have obviously not done them any favors, but according to this, the so-called "average life expectancy" of these people before the white man showed up was only about 40, and I bet it was a pretty hard 40. Survive on what you can kill, live out in the open, no medicine, modern or otherwise.... Those of you who are living in the part of the country they used to inhabit will tell us how damn difficult this life must have been.

So I will stick with the laptop and the remote control, thank you.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 12:48:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'W')e have obviously not done them any favors, but according to this, the so-called "average life expectancy" of these people before the white man showed up was only about 40, and I bet it was a pretty hard 40. Survive on what you can kill, live out in the open, no medicine, modern or otherwise.... Those of you who are living in the part of the country they used to inhabit will tell us how damn difficult this life must have been.


Those sorts of figures are severely skewed by a high infant mortality rate. If you average together someone who lived to 80 with a child that died in infancy, you get a 40 year average life expectancy. People that survived to be a couple of years old didn't have a life expectancy much different from ours.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 13:16:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', ' ')no medicine, modern or otherwise



All native folks have/had medicine, some more than others. Much of what we know of North American medicinal plants comes from the Cherokee.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 14:40:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'B')ottom line, they lived free. That's something we Homo Domesticus will probably never know. For all our fancy philosophy, when it's all said and done, we are nothing more than caged rats.
The time is coming, SPG, it's coming. With freedom comes danger. They are inseparable. I suppose that is why freedom was abandoned. Fear.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 15:42:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')I suppose that is why freedom was abandoned. Fear.



Yes - "abandon your freedom or die."

Many chose to die.

Many died anyway.

http://ngeorgia.com/history/nghisttt.html
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 19:44:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')he time is coming, SPG, it's coming. With freedom comes danger.


Good god PMS. You sound like a campaign ad for Dubya.

Safety is an illusion. There is no such thing. Thus is the strange paradox of our existence. We can give up all our freedom and still 100% of us die. No matter how much of a slave you make of yourself, sooner or later you're going to roll craps in the great casino of life. No number of laws, security cameras, ninja cops, or insurance policies can change that reality even slightly. Either you find some existential/religious means to accept that the creator made you with an expiration date, or you just spend your whole life chasing after liars and con-men that promise you what they can't provide.

IMHO, the question of why civilization prevailed is much the same as why no one reacts to Peak Oil.

1. Denial. Nobody really believed it would be this bad until it was too late to do much about it.
2. Laziness. Both problems demand difficult painful remedies and it's much easier to just do nothing.
3. Boiling frogs. Civilization didn't just take root in one foul swoop. It crept in gradually and for most individuals it was easier to try to just avoid civilization than to meet it head on and try to stop it.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 20:02:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')he time is coming, SPG, it's coming. With freedom comes danger.


Good god PMS. You sound like a campaign ad for Dubya.
Don't be mean, SPG. I was agreeing with you. The last thing I would want is to be a campaign ad for the chimp. Cut me some slack, would you? Do you disagree that freedom means danger? Lakota, Sioux, Cree, Apache, they all faced danger, that's what I was saying.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 20:18:25

They sure as hell didn't decide to give up their freedom because they were afraid of freedom, which is what it seemed like you were saying! :razz:

"Oh my GODS! We've been living this way for 20,000 years but now it's gotten all SCARY! 8O Quick, let's become civilized and go live on a nice safe reservation!"
Ludi
 

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 20:24:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'D')on't be mean, SPG. I was agreeing with you.


:oops: Sorry



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you disagree that freedom means danger? Lakota, Sioux, Cree, Apache, they all faced danger, that's what I was saying.


Yeah I disagree that freedom means danger. Being a living being on planet earth is what means danger. Actually danger isn't really the word for it. It's not like there's a possibility that we don't die. Our chance of dying is 100%. Certain doom is probably more the word. But that's just how it is. Our only choices are how we live, and perhaps *how* we die. Not if. Safety is not an option. No one escapes the toe tag in the end.

Civilization does nicely at white washing the danger. When you die, a bunch of people with uniforms and cars with flashing lights, show up and fill out a bunch of paper work. They make it seems very routine and planned. Your family members may get out of having to dig the hole and build the coffin. Some overly smiley "funeral director" will undoubtedly puff you full of chemicals and primp your hair so your family can experience the perfect "memory picture" and pretend you just went off on vacation. Doesn't make you any less dead though
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 08 Apr 2009, 20:33:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Civilization does nicely at white washing the danger.
Nicely put, but lately it doesn't look too assured.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Boris555 » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 23:35:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')
The history of North America over the past 500 years is CLEARLY one of invasion, brutality, and ultimately extermination by the whites. Whites unilaterally broke every single treaty they ever made with the Indians. Ultimately they exterminated 99% of the Indians and shoved what remains onto the most desolate useless pieces of ground anywhere to be found. That's not racism. It's reality.

If you need to give yourself a good fright, forget about watching Freddy Kruger. Just pick up one of Bartolome de Las Casas' tales of the Spanish invasion of the Caribbean. No fiction writer would dare wander into such gore. Ships navigating from Island to Island by following the trail of dead Indian slaves floating the water. Indians having their hands or feet slow roasted over a fire while they were still alive as a form of torture. Every Spanish house with an Indian carcass or two kept hanging on the porch for use as dog food. Hack off an arm. "Here you go fido. Eat up." Dude was there. He saw it with his own eyes. He had no reason to lie about it unlike many white authors of the time who were desperately searching to justify their own actions to people back in Europe.


I wasn't trying to justify the horrid behavior of any culture. And it IS culture, not race, that does these things. Saying the "whites" did all that is giving justification to people who say the "blacks" are violent and thieving. No, it's just the culture of having to survive as a second-class citizen for generations that does that, not their race.

Yes, it was mostly western Europeans, who are predominantly white, who came in and killed most of the citizenry of the native world. And mostly the Spaniards, the Portugese and the English cultures that did it. But by saying that all honkeys are responsible is racist. But it was culture, not race, that did it. Raise the defeated in the culture of the victor, and other than skin hue, you can't tell them apart.

The important thing to examine is WHY one culture did horrible things to another. And it usually boils down to three things:
1. Viewing a particular race as less important beings
2. Feeling the need to impose its belief system (i.e. religion) on others
3. Lebensraum

So by derogating "whites" or any other race you are guilty of point 1.
By saying someone should be like another culture is encroaching on point 2.
And if you want to take someone's land, for whatever reason, point 3.

The whole trick to civilization is not doing any of these things, at least not to excess. Well, that and plumbing. Gotta have plumbing.

Don't worry, everyone is guilty of these to some degree. The trick is to nip it in the bud before slavery, religious fundamentalism and wholesale slaughter begin to take root.

So yeah, there were some seriously fucked up people back in the day, and everyone should read and educate themselves about them. But they should read all sides. The natives were human, they weren't all sweetness and light. They did some bad shit too. They didn't do anywhere NEAR as much sick shit as their conquerors, but that is why the conquerors conquered. Coming ashore with a handful of flowers and a hearty handshake isn't going to get anyone to give up all their land and gold then convert to your bullshit religion. I don't agree with what they did, but then again I work in database design, not conquering. I imagine if I had taken up conquering as a career, I would be a sick bastard too. And I hope you would at least TRY to kill me.

When I was young I was beat up by a gang of Mexicans just because I was white. For weeks I hated Mexicans, I could barely even talk to some of my best friends who were Mexicans. But after a couple months I got it into my thick youthful brain that a bunch of ignorant Mexicans raised in the barrio are not the same culture as my good friends, and treating them as such is an insult to everyone. Just like not all white cultures came over here and slaughtered the natives. Where were those darn slavs anyway? The Teutonic races? They had other fish to fry. In fact, the French were notoriously nice to the natives (though not the black slaves), and even tried to ally with them to kick the English out. I'm sure there were exceptions, but I'm sure there were plenty of Spaniards who tried to be nice to the natives as well. A definite minority, sure.

I even hear not all white Americans are fat, lazy loudmouths that want to invade oil-bearing countries and make them christians. There just MIGHT be more than one white American culture. Can you believe it?

So try to remember, branding a race as bad or better than others is racist, branding a CULTURE is reality.
User avatar
Boris555
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 00:31:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Boris555', 'I') wasn't trying to justify the horrid behavior of any culture. And it IS culture, not race, that does these things. Saying the "whites" did all that is giving justification to people who say the "blacks" are violent and thieving. No, it's just the culture of having to survive as a second-class citizen for generations that does that, not their race.

Yes, it was mostly western Europeans, who are predominantly white, who came in and killed most of the citizenry of the native world. And mostly the Spaniards, the Portugese and the English cultures that did it. But by saying that all honkeys are responsible is racist. But it was culture, not race, that did it. Raise the defeated in the culture of the victor, and other than skin hue, you can't tell them apart.


Totally agree. That's why I started off with the word wasicu. Wasicu literally means "he who steals the fat". It more appropriately refers not to a skin color but a set of behaviors. Someone who greedily steals all the best things for themselves. Wicasa ska is literally "white man", but without the derogatory connotation of wasicu. Unfortunately it's not such a simple concept to articulate in English.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he important thing to examine is WHY one culture did horrible things to another. And it usually boils down to three things:
1. Viewing a particular race as less important beings
2. Feeling the need to impose its belief system (i.e. religion) on others
3. Lebensraum


No offense, but that's some koom-by-ya kind of crap. All cultures do numbers 1 and 2 from that list. In every Native American language that I know of their name for their tribe translates as "the people". Guess what that makes other tribes? Not "the people". There's a special sort of insanity though that overtakes people and leads to civilization. They stop believing in the sacred circle and start believing in straight lines. They start to see themselves not as a part of creation but as masters over it. Instead of honoring nature, they set out to destroy it. The Genesis story is very clearly one of people falling from their place in creation and becoming afflicted with civilization. For a Lakota warrior to gain honor and become more recognized in the tribe, he had to fight Crows or Shoshone. Therefore the Lakota identity is very closely tied with having these traditional enemies to fight against. If there's no more Crow, there can be no more Lakota. If there's no more bison, there's no food and the people starve. The hunter kills the individual bison with grim determination and a hard heart, but he is also intimately tied to the survival of the herd. The wasicu mind sickness sees itself as being apart. It thinks it can kill all the other peoples, all the animals, and all but a few plants, and then it can prosper. It loses track of the fact that all it's killing is suicide. We are part of creation and we can't annihilate other parts of it without killing ourselves. That doesn't mean it's a multi-cultural fairytale land where we all turn into this listless, neutered, mini-van dorks and spend all day embracing our cultural differences. Life demands conflict. It demands aggression, but also balance. The Crow kills the Lakota. The Lakota kills the Crow. There is balance, and the circle continues. It's not about stasis. It's about dynamic equilibria.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 01:19:06

Just paranthetically, the Spaniards were very equal opportunity with torture. They put plenty of white folks feet and hands in the flames also. The Inquisition.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby ralfy » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 01:40:42

Nothing special about us, either?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Boris555', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'B')ottom line, they lived free. That's something we Homo Domesticus will probably never know. For all our fancy philosophy, when it's all said and done, we are nothing more than caged rats.


Read some early literature (Project Gutenberg is a good source) by people who had contact with the indigenous Americans in their natural habitat.

Guess what...they constantly fought one another, stole from one another, got stoned when they could, treated their women like shit...

Basically, they acted like everybody else in the world. Nothing special about them. :-D
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 08:39:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Boris555', 'I') wasn't trying to justify the horrid behavior of any culture. And it IS culture, not race, that does these things. Saying the "whites" did all that is giving justification to people who say the "blacks" are violent and thieving. No, it's just the culture of having to survive as a second-class citizen for generations that does that, not their race.

Yes, it was mostly western Europeans, who are predominantly white, who came in and killed most of the citizenry of the native world. And mostly the Spaniards, the Portugese and the English cultures that did it. But by saying that all honkeys are responsible is racist. But it was culture, not race, that did it. Raise the defeated in the culture of the victor, and other than skin hue, you can't tell them apart.


Totally agree. That's why I started off with the word wasicu. Wasicu literally means "he who steals the fat". It more appropriately refers not to a skin color but a set of behaviors. Someone who greedily steals all the best things for themselves. Wicasa ska is literally "white man", but without the derogatory connotation of wasicu. Unfortunately it's not such a simple concept to articulate in English.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he important thing to examine is WHY one culture did horrible things to another. And it usually boils down to three things:
1. Viewing a particular race as less important beings
2. Feeling the need to impose its belief system (i.e. religion) on others
3. Lebensraum


No offense, but that's some koom-by-ya kind of crap. All cultures do numbers 1 and 2 from that list. In every Native American language that I know of their name for their tribe translates as "the people". Guess what that makes other tribes? Not "the people". There's a special sort of insanity though that overtakes people and leads to civilization. They stop believing in the sacred circle and start believing in straight lines. They start to see themselves not as a part of creation but as masters over it. Instead of honoring nature, they set out to destroy it. The Genesis story is very clearly one of people falling from their place in creation and becoming afflicted with civilization. For a Lakota warrior to gain honor and become more recognized in the tribe, he had to fight Crows or Shoshone. Therefore the Lakota identity is very closely tied with having these traditional enemies to fight against. If there's no more Crow, there can be no more Lakota. If there's no more bison, there's no food and the people starve. The hunter kills the individual bison with grim determination and a hard heart, but he is also intimately tied to the survival of the herd. The wasicu mind sickness sees itself as being apart. It thinks it can kill all the other peoples, all the animals, and all but a few plants, and then it can prosper. It loses track of the fact that all it's killing is suicide. We are part of creation and we can't annihilate other parts of it without killing ourselves. That doesn't mean it's a multi-cultural fairytale land where we all turn into this listless, neutered, mini-van dorks and spend all day embracing our cultural differences. Life demands conflict. It demands aggression, but also balance. The Crow kills the Lakota. The Lakota kills the Crow. There is balance, and the circle continues. It's not about stasis. It's about dynamic equilibria.


an I though you were just another dumb Doctor. :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Boris555 » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 15:21:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', 'N')othing special about us, either?


Not a damn thing that I can think of.

I spend a lot of time out on the farm trying to make things and grow things the way our ancestors did. It's amazing how quickly you go from the rhythms of working in an office to the rhythms of primitive man.

But when I'm sitting under a shelter made of sticks and leaves, I don't look forward to going back into the office when Monday morning comes, even though sitting at a desk in a climate controlled building is much more comfortable. But when sitting at my desk I do daydream about being under the shelter of sticks and leaves, roasting a hunk of meat over a small fire, sleeping next to a bunch of dogs...

So you all know what I'll be doing in a few hours. Make fire, make tool. Caveman, no fool.
User avatar
Boris555
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 17:45:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', ' ')The Crow kills the Lakota. The Lakota kills the Crow. There is balance, and the circle continues. It's not about stasis. It's about dynamic equilibria.


Plains peoples did develop ways of fighting for honor which didn't involve killing each other. In territorial disputes, simply wounding a warrior of the other tribe was sufficient ("counting coup").

As you say there was not usually the impulse to wipe out the other tribes or turn Crow into Lakota. So I would argue, no, not all people held "2. Feeling the need to impose its belief system (i.e. religion) on others". If one's own tribe was "The People" that didn't mean everyone else would be forced to be "The People" also. They would instead be "The Enemy" or possibly "those folks over there who do strange things" or "those folks over there whom we don't like much."
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 18:19:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')he time is coming, SPG, it's coming. With freedom comes danger.


Good god PMS. You sound like a campaign ad for Dubya.

Safety is an illusion. There is no such thing. Thus is the strange paradox of our existence. We can give up all our freedom and still 100% of us die. No matter how much of a slave you make of yourself, sooner or later you're going to roll craps in the great casino of life. No number of laws, security cameras, ninja cops, or insurance policies can change that reality even slightly. Either you find some existential/religious means to accept that the creator made you with an expiration date, or you just spend your whole life chasing after liars and con-men that promise you what they can't provide.

IMHO, the question of why civilization prevailed is much the same as why no one reacts to Peak Oil.

1. Denial. Nobody really believed it would be this bad until it was too late to do much about it.
2. Laziness. Both problems demand difficult painful remedies and it's much easier to just do nothing.
3. Boiling frogs. Civilization didn't just take root in one foul swoop. It crept in gradually and for most individuals it was easier to try to just avoid civilization than to meet it head on and try to stop it.


I feel fairly safe. I've never feared being strung up on the front porch of the enemy and fed to their dogs. Civilization is more than a thin veneer, it goes right to the bone, with most modern people. I don't buy that we all revert to barbarism, given half a chance....and I've met some horrible people. I just consider them to be in the minority.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Lakota way of life

Unread postby efarmer » Fri 10 Apr 2009, 20:03:03

I have known and done ceremony with a swath of
different native people, mostly Sun Dancers from
plains tribes. I don't know much about their ways
but I have been able to enjoy some time with them
and form some basis of thinking about such things.

I see these people as working hard to preserve some of the
best of their roots and traditions and also fitting in where they
find themselves now. Some get pulled out of line by adoring
people desperate for seeing if they can get a set of credentials
from native culture and some are working to synthesize the
best of what they come from and what is around to work with
now.

This suggests to me that there is a great yearning among many
folks to get knowledge and experience about living closer to
a system of cooperative community and cooperating with
natural systems instead of what they are living like at present.

I have confidence this will continue, but I think that we will synthesize
new forms based on multiple cultures and traditions as a result.
I don't believe natives returning to their ancestral lives is any
more probable than us returning to our romantic notions of
life in the villages of 1820 New England or wherever our
sense of the last time we lived in a semblance of natural
balance took place.

I do hope that human effort keeps getting applied to living
systems that are more sustainable and more naturally
resilient than what we slapped together between wars
with a temporary cheap energy exploit in the 20th century.

All my relations.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron