Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

US Army Prepares for SHTF in the States

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 04:07:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'I') had a G/F once who was in the former Yugoslav Army; they were all addicted to heroin at least at the foot soldier level, and Saturday nights and battle nights they would be given ecstacy.

Poor choice of G/F.
Is there any fun in fu..ing some ex-military drug addict infected with God knows what? :-D


That was before the internet brought free safe sex to the world of wankers.
Back in the day when you took what you could get.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 04:11:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')Back in the day when you took what you could get.

Was that all, what you could get (ex-military drug addict)?
Poor man. :-D
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 04:18:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')Back in the day when you took what you could get.

Was that all, what you could get (ex-military drug addict)?
Poor man. :-D


The quality of Slavic sex partners is a tad off topic; I brought this up to show one of the ways a screwed up military ideology can keep young soldiers doing things they would never have dreamt of.

It's well known that Amphetamines and Opiates were very popular with a certain German military commander 65+ years ago. Nothing new about that. It only works for a year or 2 though because of calcium leeching.
The 2% of Luftwaffer who survived WW2 came out psychotic with no teeth and brittle bones.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 07:05:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')The quality of Slavic sex partners is a tad off topic; I brought this up to show one of the ways a screwed up military ideology can keep young soldiers doing things they would never have dreamt of.

I have nothing against Slavic girls.
I am Polish myself.
My remarks are general in nature.
Ex-military women with drug addiction problems and damaged psychology due to shooting civilians are just not worth to pay attention to, would they be Slavic, American of Chinese.
Their health, both physical and mental is already damaged, usually beyond repair.

The same holds true for many ex-military men, say many Vietnam veterans or Russians after Afghan experience, however IMO feminine health is getting destroyed much faster in defunct military environment.

Did they run needle exchange schemes for Serb military personnel or did they simply allow some common junkie practices based on brotherhood of blood?
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 09:33:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')What I am trying to say is that it is not impossible to force Americans into martial laws and military dictatorship.
If it can be done in NK (or number of dozens of other countries), then why not in US?


Nothing is impossible EU. However, the size of the US as well as the history makes running such a large scale military dictatorship very difficult, the only real comparable ones would be China under Mao and the USSR under Stalin. In both cases you are talking about "Communist" totalitarian regimes that only came about after Civil War, and establishing any kind of military dictatorship here, either Fascist or Communist will also first entail a civil war.

You seem to picture most Amerikans as fat lazy slobs who will just roll over and play dead for jackbooted thugs paid by the Banksters. At some point in the recruitment here of additional personnel necessary to fire on their brothers and sisters, the military will fracture. There will be a breakup of the US into Regions, and internecine battles for control within the regions as a much more likely outcome than a single country with one Dictator like Idi Amin or Saddam. Not to say your individual Regions won't have their own little Hitlers or little Stalins, however you can get your Fidels and your Hugos also. The likeliest outcome is that the US becomes a bunch of Banana Republics like you find down in South America, with different Dictatorial leaders who have different qualities. Some better, some worse in terms of the level of violence used to maintain control.

In converting over to Communist Dictatorship from the Monarchies of the Romanoffs and the Chinese Emperors, the general apparatus of Goobermint didn't change all that much, in the case of the US the whole Goobermint apparatus of elected officials at a variety of levels will change A LOT. Even in the best of times the Plutocracy some call Democracy here had a lot of problems running, and moreover the whole business has been based on a Fiat Money system which is now going down the toilet. Without functioning money of ANY kind, its going to be real hard for any individual in any area to take control. Remember, your dictators like Saddam always had outside sources of Money funding them, the less resources a Dictator had to exploit and sell off to the Banksters, the less control over a given area they would have. Idi Amin didn't have as much Oil in his region as Saddam had in his, so he controlled only a smaller population that was even more impoverished than Iraquis were under Saddam.

Thing is, this is actually going to take a little while to play out here because TPTB aren't going to give up the Fiat Monetary system without a fight, which means they will keep printing Dollars until a disconnect happens and people no longer take dollars because they have become meaningless. They will continue to print dollars to continue paying Unemployment, continue paying SS, continue paying the Soldiers. They CANNOT raise enough money through Tax Revenue or Borrowing from the Chinese to do this, so they MUST print it. When it stops working is anybody's guess, but right now the indications are that unrestricted monetary supply inflation can go for another year maybe? By the time it finally implodes, it will be far too late for a single US Dictator to take control here and turn the US into a Fascist version of China or the USSR, so you get the Banana Republic effect.

My guess would be that once the monetary system fails, left to their own and unexploited by outside influences, bribery and greed, the individual regions will resolve most of the overshoot problems through internecine fighting, probably killing off 50% in a typical region. After a while, people will get tired of the fighting and start to rebuild. Plenty of stuff from the Oil Era to scavenge and rebuild from in the first go round of this. The initial fighting will take a while, the rebuilding phase will take a while, then you probably have another go round of this somewhere down the line. I'm not going to put an absolute timeline on it other than I think it takes less than 100 years for at least 2 more go rounds.

I won't be around to see the End Game, that is for sure. Well, unless it all ends on 12-21-2012, which also is possible. I will however...wait for it...

See You on the Other Side.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 09:39:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')Back in the day when you took what you could get.

Was that all, what you could get (ex-military drug addict)?
Poor man. :-D


The quality of Slavic sex partners is a tad off topic; I brought this up to show one of the ways a screwed up military ideology can keep young soldiers doing things they would never have dreamt of.

It's well known that Amphetamines and Opiates were very popular with a certain German military commander 65+ years ago. Nothing new about that. It only works for a year or 2 though because of calcium leeching.
The 2% of Luftwaffer who survived WW2 came out psychotic with no teeth and brittle bones.


Nazi Crank
vision-master
 
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 10:00:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'S')orry to say that, but an average Iraqi or Afghan man is close to indefinitely more combat worthy than an average American man.
If it ever happened for US government to order US Army take on US citizens, entire adventure would remind sheep slaughter.


Hello. The entire US Military is COMPOSED of average American men. Actually probably BELOW average American men, since only really dumb suckers get themselves sent to Iraq to DIE. LOL.

While you do have say 100,000 fairly well trained soldiers fighting in Iraq, you have at least a MILLION Gang Bangers in Harlem and another MILLION Drug Workers in East LA and another MILLION Mexican Wetbacks down in Houston fresh from the Drug Wars in Tijuana who ALL are ARMED to the teeth who in NO WAY are going to roll over and play dead here. LOL.

Yes, we have plenty of fat and complacent Americans at the top end of the food chain who will get eaten alive here. However, there are many MORE really vicious POOR folks who have PLENTY of experience in Firefights on the streeets of LA. You REALLY think 100K Soldier Boys are going to do all that well against a few MILLION of them? LOL.

Reverse Engineer


Humm, on this I think I agree, to a point. A very long time ago and under different circumstances I was in the miliatary. Well, Coast Guard and they had a gun at boot camp, I even got to shoot it once. Decent bunch of well intentioned and smart guys. Probably above both military and US average intelligence.

Even 100,000 (as opposed to the 800 confirmed) soldiers would have a tough time if the center city gangs let loose and starting ruling the streets. I think that large parts of the cities would be abandoned to gang law, even more than they now are. The troops would be used to secure passage corridors for the "fat and complacent."

In short, the military would be used as a private protection force for the influential.

Of course nothing is ever that clear. For example: our military is now being used to (attempt to) secure a healthy portion of the worlds final oil reserves. Plain and simple and in front of our eyes. Yet I doubt most Americans would agree with that. Likewise, most Americans would hail the heroes who are fighting crime in our ghettos.

I'm still waiting for someone to cite a credible source for anything over 800 to 1,000 troops.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby deMolay » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 10:02:57

I have to agree with RE here somewhat. It is always about the cost of projecting power. The Roman's withdrew from England as they could no longer afford to project power into the captured outer fringes of empire. The citizen's of Rome actually welcomed the hordes of barbarians into their homeland. Why because the taxation of the actual citizens of Rome had reached such a point that Romans found the barbarian hordes a relief to the thievery of their elected officials. In medieval Europe, the people were held hostage in the fuedal system because they could not afford the tools of war necessary ie the armour horses etc. To challenge the knights of the Lord. Sticks clubs etc could not defeat a mounted knight with armour who was a skilled and trained warrior. When gunpowder came along this changed the rules. A farmboy fresh from the plow could be taught to shoot a musket. And take down the knight in armour. The British Empire fell apart when the British could no longer protect the shipping lanes, as more and more of the vanquished achieved the means of fighting back and challenged them on all fronts. The taxation at home in Britain made the cost of projecting power all over the world no longer feasible. The only reason that 1776 worked out for the Colonists was that Britain was at the same time fighting major wars of Empire. The USA was just a brush fire to them. But a brushfire at the right juncture of history. The full weight of the British Empire War Machine never fell upon the USA luckily. The same in the present scenario. Remember this the USA would not be able to use all their war toys on the people of the USA. And in order to subdue a country you still have to put boots on the street. In spite of the shock and awe we all saw on CNN. In order to subdue Iraq, the USA still had to put boots on the street. And the USA is many times larger than Iraq etc. It is much more difficult to subdue those that have lived basically free, than it is to subdue those that are used to being ruled by a dictator like Saddam. The USA would have rebellion within their military as well as rebellion on the street. Many of the war toys would leak from the bases onto the street very fast. You would see the population resist very quickly in the USA. Relatively quickly they would have Stingers, etc and it would become very costly in manpower and funds to subdue and control a country as vast as the USA. They would have to control all rodes and means of transport of food, and all necessary supplies to keep the cities passified even as they were rebelling. And at the same time as soldiers would be rebelling within the military itself. It would be very ugly and would quickly descend into total chaos. A very ugly civil war would quickly ensue. And it would not be clearly defined as the last civil war. Every state and region would be embroiled without clear lines drawn. The more the military lashed out the more problems they would create. They could very quickly become the hunted as they would have the most to lose, as in supplies food etc. At the same time there would be challenges externally to the US Empire. Many states would see this as a time to strike out. Strike a blow from afar. Just my opinion.
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 10:48:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('deMolay', 'T')o challenge the knights of the Lord. Sticks clubs etc could not defeat a mounted knight with armour who was a skilled and trained warrior.

Ever heard about a crossbow?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen gunpowder came along this changed the rules. A farmboy fresh from the plow could be taught to shoot a musket. And take down the knight in armour.

Late feudal times (XVII-XVIII century) were far more oppressive to farmers than early feudal times.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he British Empire fell apart when the British could no longer protect the shipping lanes, as more and more of the vanquished achieved the means of fighting back and challenged them on all fronts. The taxation at home in Britain made the cost of projecting power all over the world no longer feasible.

British Empire have failed because it was probably never worth keeping and Britain gradually lost mercantilist capital.
WWI/II didn't help either.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd the USA is many times larger than Iraq etc. It is much more difficult to subdue those that have lived basically free, than it is to subdue those that are used to being ruled by a dictator like Saddam.

If Russian leaders did it, why American ones should fail?

NB. Russia (or former SU) was far bigger than US btw.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he USA would have rebellion within their military as well as rebellion on the street.
This remains to be seen.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')any of the war toys would leak from the bases onto the street very fast.
And mob would not know how to use these.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou would see the population resist very quickly in the USA. Relatively quickly they would have Stingers, etc and it would become very costly in manpower and funds to subdue and control a country as vast as the USA.
At this point affected areas would be cordoned off or government would resort to phosphorus bombs, termobaric bombs or may be even to WMDs as need arise.

Ever heard of president Assad of Syria?
Or about good old Saddam?
Or about Russians in Grozny?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey would have to control all rodes and means of transport of food,
It would be enough to cut off or poison water supplies.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he more the military lashed out the more problems they would create.
Once US Army decided to proceed with population crush in areas of resistance, eg by deployment of WMD, rebellion would stand no chance of success.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')At the same time there would be challenges externally to the US Empire. Many states would see this as a time to strike out. Strike a blow from afar. Just my opinion.
Who would make such a challenge?
1. Everyone would have domestic problems as great as US does.
2. What the point to meddle and expose yourself to American nukes?

I would say like this:
If such repressions started within US, all other nations would look with fear and no one would make a slightest peep, until matters are resolved within US one way or another.

And if someone have made a peep, it would probably be a nuclear strike on whatever remains from US army, government and its control and command structure.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby Jotapay » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 11:15:57

This is old news. Last November the US Army War College issued a report that the military needed to redirect its attention to deploy against Americans domestically in response to civil unrest caused by economic collapse.

Phoenix Article Link

Veterans article about this

This is the actual report
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 11:29:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'T')his is old news. Last November the US Army War College issued a report that the military needed to redirect its attention to deploy against Americans domestically in response to civil unrest caused by economic collapse.

Phoenix Article Link

Veterans article about this

This is the actual report



Lay down your weapons

Come out with your hands up

Get down on the ground, NOW. :lol:

Image

Image
vision-master
 
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby pedalling_faster » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 20:45:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'I')t's well known that Amphetamines and Opiates were very popular with a certain German military commander 65+ years ago. Nothing new about that. It only works for a year or 2 though because of calcium leeching.


THAT EXPLAINS IT !!!

i always wondered why meth addicts had bad teeth. if it was because they stopped taking care of their teeth, neglecting to floss etc.

http://www.mappsd.org/Meth%20Mouth.htm

Meth Mouth Symptoms

* Dry Mouth - Saliva acts as a buffer against acidic substances in the mouth, neutralizing it and protecting teeth against acidic foods like lemons, acid from the gut or acidic plaque. The average person creates around one liter of saliva a day. If saliva production is reduced, oral bacteria levels can increase ten times over normal levels.
Meth dries out the salivary glands. Without saliva, the acidic substances can eat away at the minerals in tooth enamel, causing holes or weak spots that turn into cavities. Other medications dry the mouth but Meth is especially bad.
* Tooth Decay - Meth users are notorious for trying to treat cottonmouth with lots of sugary soda. The bacteria that feed on the sugars in the mouth secrete acid, which leads to more tooth decay. Also, Meth users aren’t likely to floss, brush and rinse when high.
A typical cavity starts in-between two teeth. It eventually invades the tooth and destroys it from the inside out. Crank decay invariably starts at the gum line - it eventually spreads around the entire tooth, eating swathes of enamel in its wake.
* Cracked Teeth - Because the drug can make them feel anxious or nervous, causing them to clench or grind their teeth, regular Meth users may develop cracks in their teeth.
* Gum Disease - Teeth and gums need blood to stay healthy. Meth causes the vessels that supply blood to oral tissues to shrink up. Reduced blood supply causes tissues to break down. With repeated shrinking, the blood vessels don’t recover and tissues die.
http://www.LASIK-Flap.com/ ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: US Preparing Military Response To Economic Chaos

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 05 Apr 2009, 22:55:35

Wow, we went from discussing tinfoil to dental floss. What a place this site has become.
mos6507
 

Previous

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests