by TheDude » Mon 30 Mar 2009, 22:51:23
Oh, they still have Matt on CNBC for their little soundbite fêtes, right? Doubt he gets much more props than Jeff Rubin though.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')gnoring for the moment the large Canadian oil sands reserves that would be marketable with oil prices above $80 per barrel, any sudden recognition of a Ghawar peak would most likely also propel sudden, and irreversible, changes in U.S. energy policy.
The price only held above $80/bbl for a bit less than a year, so this hasn't exactly been tested rigorously. It's up in the air whether consumers can stomach long periods of these sustained highs.
Nice idea for a thread. I'm more curious about Matt's statement that Mexico will wrap things up export-wise this year - if he's right about that it will have some serious implications with the loss of ca. 1.2 mb/d in a single year, worse than any hurricane or refinery outage. More likely he's just spouting here.
The call on NG was warranted - never before had so many wells been drilled in one year, it was truly unknown territory, and we in the US should move away from this reliance on having to drill 35k holes every year for heat + electricity.