An AP business article run yesterday April 16th said:
"If, on the whole, (corporate) earnings can go up, then we might be able to overcome oil and inflation and all the other things."
Does this statement make any sense whatsoever?
It seems like circular logic. Isn’t it oil and inflation (and the “other things”) much of the reason that “on the whole” corporate earnings are down in the first place?
Aren’t corporate earnings in general a reflection of consumer confidence (falling), retail sales (falling), and purchasing power/employment rates (falling)?
Aren’t corporate earnings in general also a reflection of interest rates (rising, perhaps aggressively soon) and energy costs (rising)?
Is my logic flawed?
Seems to me that it would take some very creative accounting for corporate earnings to suddenly “overcome oil and inflation and all the other things” when it is in fact those very problems (and their offshoots) that are hampering earnings in the first place. (Perhaps if you believe that oil and inflation can be brought under control we could increase earnings – but that is not what is being argued in the AP quote.)
The American economy is looking pretty scary. I think Montequest pointed out some interesting indicators.
Will this be the “all-time, and forever all-time high, of economic growth and afflulence?”
Well, it’s always darkest before dawn….
I’ve been saying that for sometime now. And darnit-all-to-gosh I’ll keep on saying it. That kind’ve confidence might be all that can save us.
Even as it keeps getting darker and darker.
It’s not getting darker. It’s not. It’s not. It’s not. If we can increase corporate earnings, all our problems (even the problems causing declining earnings) will just go away.
