by Sixstrings » Tue 17 Mar 2009, 21:49:54
Please, this insanity must stop.
SUPPOSEDLY, the reason for employment-based drug testing is to protect employers from unreliable, drug-addled employees. (the irony here is that the workplace is chock full of people whacked out on legal, prescribed drugs)
So, I can understand why employers like to drug test. It weeds out (so to speak) those people who are SO messed up that they can't even get clean long enough for the initial employment screen.
But once someone has already been gainfully employed, and is then laid off -- just WHO does the government think they are to deny just and due *unemployment* benefits. This isn't welfare here, this is an insurance program for people who work.
It's like saying "yes, I know you've worked hard and showed up for work for the last ten years, yes I know you were laid off, but screw you cuz you smoke pot." The hypocrisy here is beyond tolerable. For Pet's sake, a *majority* of all government officials, US military, police and firefighters have used illegal drugs before. So many police department applicants have smoked pot that they had to remove that as a disqualifier years ago.
Lastly, this idea is incredibly boneheaded. Just think about it. A drug addict who's gainfully employed suddenly gets laid off, and then DENIED unemployment. So now you've got an with no legal recourse for income. Doesn't that just invite more crime? What would you rather have folks, some unemployment bennies for laid off working poor or a home invasion?