Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjust?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby Andrew_S » Thu 13 Dec 2007, 16:37:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eXpat', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GenghisKen', '
')8) Metals and paper wont buy you food unless people beleive that the paper and metal you try to trade with are actually important.(american indians left the gold on the ground cause ya cant eat it).
Peak oil isn't what frightens me it's peak everything at once that gives me nightmares..


You can say that again and again, in a crisis, you can have piles of gold and silver, is the guy with food that has the upper hand in that situation, and he knows it, another thing that he doesn't do is to trade in the stock market either, so speeches of how well this and that (gold, silver, paper money, etc) are going to fare in the future will not tempt him.

You assume that the only trade will be barter, i.e. no money will be acceptable. I believe that only in the most extreme circumstances where no trade markets exists would that be the case. Gold, and likely silver also, will remain as an acceptable monetary medium.
Andrew_S
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby zeke » Thu 13 Dec 2007, 22:28:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Andrew_S', '
')You assume that the only trade will be barter, i.e. no money will be acceptable. I believe that only in the most extreme circumstances where no trade markets exists would that be the case.



it depends how far things break down. if you're hungry, you want food, not a promisory note OF food, or some trinkets which you then have to trade yet again for food with someone who wants those trinkets.

I think the big distinction to be made here is between things which have actual value and those things which have representative value.

Food has intrinsic value. Gold has value only if everyone who encounters it agrees that it has value, and it is used to represent the value of other things.

If the guy with food wants a hammer or a coat in trade, and you have only gold coins, then you just have some nice-looking metal discs, in practical terms.

z
User avatar
zeke
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri 07 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby spudbuddy » Mon 17 Dec 2007, 22:35:04

Fascinating stuff.
I don't live there...but a majority now do - and with the political clout on a municipal basis, will have to be attended to.

I like the idea of retraction / infill...and better use of existing sprawl.
In many large cities, one can still ramble main streets where original houses have been converted into main floor storefronts, with living quarters upstairs.

Consider the sqare footage of a suburban mall - and then convert that into an existing subdivision community....all sqeezed down into small store sizes.
This model makes the necessity for incessant motoring non-essential, when one has the choice of covering a few surrounding blocks on foot (as is the case in urban neighborhoods.)

Perhaps hard to imagine when one views the layout of suburbia as it now exists - but what I described above - often was not radically changed from its original desing until it was a few decades in existence (eg. - an inner city house built in the 1920's - converted into a ground floor commercial space in the 1960's.)
So surely this is possible.
requires re-zoning, and a re-set in suburban thinking.
When dictated by necessity, entirely possible - why not?

Not only do we radically reduce fuel dependency (as in vehicular) but re-design communities that are probably more desireable to live in, as in walkable, and more socially condusive to a public discourse.

This is a radical departure - from the inner sanctum of the lonely single commuter inside a car , and from the insular nature of suburban households as they are currently set up, in many places...especially the newer suburban and exurban models - house set apart by an acre or two (as if they were farmhouses...)

Which also brings to mind the idea of a lot of that land put to good use - growing food - and not lawns that require oceans of fuel to mow constantly.
User avatar
spudbuddy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby mackina1 » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 19:18:43

Have you guys given any thoughts to highrises? A city made up of tightly packed concrete housing could hold far more people per kilometer than any of the proposals. Of course it would have to be built anew, and be supplied with power and materials from a relatively well functioning economy. But just imagine the dark image it would create of cities. Ten to twenty stories tall buildings blocking out the sunlight. The street level being a bit in disrepair, since almost all uses their feet or prefer to take the metros. Blahblahblah.
User avatar
mackina1
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 25 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby emersonbiggins » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 19:27:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mackina1', 'H')ave you guys given any thoughts to highrises? A city made up of tightly packed concrete housing could hold far more people per kilometer than any of the proposals. Of course it would have to be built anew, and be supplied with power and materials from a relatively well functioning economy. But just imagine the dark image it would create of cities. Ten to twenty stories tall buildings blocking out the sunlight. The street level being a bit in disrepair, since almost all uses their feet or prefer to take the metros. Blahblahblah.


High rises don't necessarily have to be an abomination to street life. In fact, if designed properly, with the proper setbacks to allow for sun angles to penetrate through a block, high-rises can be preferable to low-density development, as they concentrate more activity in a smaller area.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Postby Jenab6 » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 19:43:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'O')nce-a-day commode flushing, anyone? :o

Almost there. I have a 1000-gallon capacity cistern for my bathing, laundry, dishwashing and toilet flushing needs. I have an additional 300 gallons of water in rainbarrels for cooking and drinking. I've run out of water before, back when I didn't realize how much water a person could use if he lived like a water-hogging city dweller, so I've made certain arrangments that limits my need to flush the toilet to maybe twice a day. Actually, in an emergency, I don't need the indoor flushing toilet at all, but it's there and it's the least awkward way to drop a load after the caffeine from my morning cup of coffee kicks in.

I wonder how much water I use. Twice a day flushing...4 gallons? Cooking & drinking... 2 gallons? Laundry 60 gallons per 20 days, or 3 gallons per day. Water for goat and cat... 1 gallon. Bathing... average maybe 2 gallons per day. Dishwashing 1 gallon per day. Toss in another gallon per day for incidentals (while brushing teeth, etc.) and what do we have? 14 gallons per day. Just a rough estimate.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab6
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun 25 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjust?

Postby dinopello » Sun 15 Mar 2009, 09:46:10

How are the suburbs adjusting ?

Suburbia R.I.P.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ul-de-sac neighborhoods once filled with the sound of backyard barbecues and playing children are falling silent. Communities like Elk Grove, Calif., and Windy Ridge, N.C., are slowly turning into ghost towns with overgrown lawns, vacant strip malls and squatters camping in empty homes.

A study by the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech predicts that by 2025 there will be as many as 22 million unwanted large-lot homes in suburban areas.

Already low or middle-income families priced out of cities and better neighborhoods are moving into McMansions divided for multi-family use. Alison Arieff, who blogs for The New York Times, visited one such tract mansion that was split into four units, or "quartets," each with its own entrance, which is not unlike what happened to many stately homes in the 1930s. The difference, of course, is that the 1930s homes held up because they were made with solid materials, and today's spec homes are all hollow doors, plastic columns and faux stone facades.

There is also speculation that subdivision homes could be dismantled and sold for scrap now that a mini-industry for repurposed lumber and other materials has evolved over the last few years. Around the periphery of these discussions is the specter of the suburb as a ghost town patrolled by squatters and looters, as if Mad Max had come to the cul-de-sac.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjust?

Postby mos6507 » Wed 18 Mar 2009, 12:01:58

If the suburbs are dead somebody should tell prospective home buyers in the Boston area because I still can't afford to buy a house within the arc of Rt. 128. So we're really talking about EXurbs which are being abandoned.
mos6507
 

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

cron