by Ludi » Thu 05 Mar 2009, 14:29:19
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'Y')ou have a very unclear way of expressing these ideas, by calling these loved ones "parasites" and lumping them in with "grifters" and lazy people who don't feel like working. It's no wonder many people here can't tell what you have been trying to say.
Maybe developing a clearer way of expressing your ideas would help, instead of accusing people who are confused by you "disingenuous."
I still can't tell from what you say what sorts of people you would like to legally euthanize. Maybe you can clarify.
Are you talking about euthanizing terminally ill people? Anyone who is disabled? "Grifters"/petty criminals? Lazy people who don't want to work?
Please be very specific.
Alright Ludi, I will try to answer as clearly as I can. In order to do so however, I first need you to answer a few questions of
mine:
1) Do you believe that a large-scale human dieoff is likely to occur in the near future (meaning say, over the course of this century)?
2) Assuming, for the moment, that you
do believe such a dieoff will be occurring, do you also believe that there exists the potential for this dieoff to encompass the complete extinction of the human species?
Not that it necessarily
will, but that it
could?
3) Assuming, for the moment, that you
do believe that such a potential exists, do you believe that it is possible to increase the chances of avoiding complete extinction, depending on how we respond as a species to impending dieoff?
Please answer these three questions 'yes' or 'no'. No waffling, no changing the subject, no 'what ifs' or 'suppose thats'. Depending on your responses, I may have a few more to ask.
I will not answer your questions. YOU brought up the issue of "parasites" and legal killing of humans.
There is no reason for me to answer your questions in order for you to clarify your position.