by TWilliam » Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:56:01
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DoomWarrior', 'I')f pot were legalized, the demand for pot would skyrocket (presumably); thus, that $14-billion California market would likely balloon by many times.
No, it would not. This is one of the most persistent pieces of false anti-drug propaganda out there:
The available research, as affirmed by a recent Federal analysis of drug policy, indicates there would be little if any increase in use.
From 1972 to 1978, eleven states decriminalized marijuana possession (covering one-third of the US population) and 33 other states reduced punishment to probation with record erased after six months to one year. Yet, after 1978 marijuana use steadily declined for over a decade. Decriminalization did not increase marijuana use.
[National Research Council, "Informing America’s Policy On Illegal Drugs: What We Don’t Know Keeps Hurting Us" (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001), pp. 192-193.]
The Netherlands decriminalized possession and allowed small scale sales of marijuana beginning in 1976. Yet, marijuana use in Holland is half the rate of use in the USA. It is also lower than the United Kingdom which had continued to treat possession as a crime. The UK is now moving toward decriminalization.
[Center for Drug Research, "Licit and Illicit Drug Use in The Netherlands 1997" (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands: CEDRO, 1999; Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, "Drug Policy in the Netherlands: Progress Report Sept. 1997-Sept. 1999 (The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, Nov. 1999); US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse 1998, 1999, and 2000 (Washington, DC: SAMHSA).From
DrugWarDistortions.org.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')lso, if pot were taxed heavily, and if all of the pot-related criminals were let free, the economic benefit to states could, in theory, far exceed the health-related detriment of excessive pot use.
'Health-related detriment' is minimal-to-non-existent with regard to cannabis. The only aspect of cannabis use shown to have any consistently negative impact on health is the actual smoking of it, and it is the by-products of combustion that present the risk, not the psychoactive components. These impacts can be completely mitigated by utilizing means of ingestion other than smoking.
Cannabis is quite likely the safest known intoxicant on the planet...