Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Eye of the Storm

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby Revi » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 09:06:52

Here in Maine I think the eye of the storm has passed over us. We're into winter now. People in my neighborhood were using 5 gallon cans to get off road diesel to heat their houses a month ago. Now they'll be using one of them a day. We have an unemployment rate way over 10% in my county, officially.

We're losing population.

We are back into the unrelenting recession again here.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 10:10:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
')We're losing population.


I hope you see that as a good thing. It is if it keeps up longterm.
mos6507
 

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby outcast » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 11:32:09

The northern states have been losing population for some time to the sunbelt states.
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 11:52:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('outcast', 'T')he northern states have been losing population for some time to the sunbelt states.


Florida has been a traditional retirement destination for New Englanders for ages. As the demographics shift older, then you'd see a pickup in emigration even with cheap oil. A lot of people just don't enjoy the cold, or they become more sensitive to it with age like my mom.

I can see some contradictory factors in leaving cold areas. On the one side, it's a benefit to escape the cold to escape the heating costs. But if you leave to Florida and the rest of your family stays behind, then one side or the other is going to have to keep flying back and forth for visits and that will start adding up.

Also, Florida is housing bust central, not to mention hurricane alley. But old habits die hard.
mos6507
 

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 12:23:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', 'T')he costs are paid, but not necessarily on time. The rub here is that we haven't been paying the costs yet. There is temporal dimension to the problem.
Of course we have. Pollution, the military in the ME, traffic, etc.. Are all costs we are paying now. We can say that some costs have not been realized, but we can't say that we haven't been paying costs yet.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', 'I') agree with Monte on this one. We haven't been paying. But we will. The cost is there. Messing with Nature is like asking a bad guy for a loan. There's no getting away from it: you either pay or he'll come back and break your kneecaps.
I don't disagree that we will pay more, but I disagree w/ the statement that we haven't been paying, because we clearly have via pollution, costs in the ME, etc... I also disagree w/ a comparison to something like a bill, since externalities don't wait for us. They will cost us whatever off whenever they show up.

It's not that we haven't been paying. It's that we have been paying and will continue to pay.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 12:32:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
')We're losing population.


I hope you see that as a good thing. It is if it keeps up longterm.


They're still out there, somewhere. Money follows people. Food follows money. There's little to cherish but little diversity of choice and the inevitable rise in prices that comes from a smaller pool of consumers.
Last edited by CarlosFerreira on Wed 17 Dec 2008, 12:35:11, edited 1 time in total.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 12:34:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'I') don't disagree that we will pay more, but I disagree w/ the statement that we haven't been paying, because we clearly have via pollution, costs in the ME, etc... I also disagree w/ a comparison to something like a bill, since externalities don't wait for us. They will cost us whatever off whenever they show up.

It's not that we haven't been paying. It's that we have been paying and will continue to pay.


Now I see what you mean. Agreed, of course.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 14:13:29

"Like a passing hurricane, this “eye of the storm” in gas and oil prices is setting us up for an even more painful energy crisis in the very near future. We must consider that, should oil prices and demand remain low for an extended period, new investment in oil production — not to mention renewables — will fall to such an extent that, with worldwide depletion of existing fields at 6.7 percent a year, there simply will not be enough new oil, or oil replacement energy, to power an economic recovery."

I wrote that in my initial post 7 years ago. While it was geared for that moment in time, it is still a timely musing. It appears the eye wall is still a few years off with the residual hold-out from the glut, but the strength of the hurricane winds has been elevated to a Cat-off-the charts. Low oil prices not only inhibit exploration and production, but they increase demand, as we all well know. When these two forces meet in an ever-declining EROEI world, the winds of change will blow hard....but in what direction?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 16:22:42

People were predicting that unconventional wouldn't save us and yet the fracking boom seemed to emerge within a couple years. So I don't really buy into the narrative of doom due to oil development latency. As long as there's oil to be drilled, it will be drilled, regardless of above-ground factors.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 18:23:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'P')eople were predicting that unconventional wouldn't save us and yet the fracking boom seemed to emerge within a couple years. So I don't really buy into the narrative of doom due to oil development latency. As long as there's oil to be drilled, it will be drilled, regardless of above-ground factors.


And it didn't, anymore than Alaska back in the 80's saved us. We didn't drill unconventional oil until it became profitable to do so. I think the majority predicted that only expensive oil would result in unconventional oil being developed, and that was correct.

Imagine you are pumping an oil well, and you are using the oil you pump to sell and also to refine into diesel to run the pump. When do you stop pumping the well? When the diesel engine dies due to lack of fuel or when you have no extra oil to sell? Doesn't matter, does it?

When the EROEI <1 it doesn't make sense to not cap the well. Sure, you could use some other energy source to pump, but it won't defeat the physics involved. If you drill anyway, regardless of above ground factors, is when a fool and somebodies' money are soon parted.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby Lore » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 18:43:56

Over the last ten years peak oil has really evolved, at least for me, as a metaphor for resource depletion and general environmental degradation. It should be by now pretty plain to see by everybody that humans will burn whatever carbon producing resource is left to extend their presence on the planet from oil to wood. Up until the time they can no longer do so.

The fast crashers have long vacated this joint and for good reason. None of us really know where the bottom of the barrel is at.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 18:52:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'T')he fast crashers have long vacated this joint and for good reason. None of us really know where the bottom of the barrel is at.


We knew we were in the eye of the storm. Many said the storm was over. Now the winds are starting to rise once again. But, I agree, hard to see the bottom of the barrel, it is covered with all kinds of denial.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby Lore » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:05:03

That's the problem, it's a shell game that keeps everybody guessing. The con man is counting on your denial and belief that there really is a pea that still exists under one of the shells.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby Rod_Cloutier » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:05:29

Montequest- where have you been in your absence. The rest of us are interested in hearing your story?
Rod_Cloutier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:24:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rod_Cloutier', 'M')ontequest- where have you been in your absence. The rest of us are interested in hearing your story?


Oh, reflecting on life. Moved back to the family farm in Missouri, built a home. See my post in Planning for the Future? Waiting for the other shoe to drop.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:29:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
When the EROEI <1 it doesn't make sense to not cap the well. Sure, you could use some other energy source to pump, but it won't defeat the physics involved. If you drill anyway, regardless of above ground factors, is when a fool and somebodies' money are soon parted.

I have to nit pick here a bit. If you used some other energy source to pump a low production well, say hydro power or wood fired steam, you would be converting that power source into liquid crude. No matter how much the hydro power or steam power cost it could not be used to fly a jet plane where the crude from the well could. If National defense depends on the jet fuel and it most likely will then you will use any means necessary to fill their tanks and that equation will determine when the wells get shut off and capped.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:42:09

My recall when Monty started here was in my early lurking period, prompting drastic rethink particularly regarding population reduction as an urgent necessity. Part of the philosophy was about society at large facing up to some core truths about population & resources. In the years since, the lies & obfuscation have only gotten worse. Bill Gates hands out condoms while the MIC hands out war implements & most of the world gets on with growth, of population, of consumption. If anything there appears less likelihood than ever of reality entering the global politic.

It is the lack of truth & sanity forcing us back to our micro world, the only one we have any real power to control. The big picture is screwed. We can deny it, or pretend we are really trying to fix it, but our participation is insignificant to the outcome either way- the socioeconomic momentum is too great.

We are headed off Hubberts cliff & it is just a matter of when. We are led by a bunch of total lunatics whose demise will parallel most of the rest of us with them.

I have given up on expecting truth or sanity to eventually prevail in society. Just trying to keep my own little world OK for as long as possible is about it.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:48:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', ' ')If you used some other energy source to pump a low production well, say hydro power or wood fired steam, you would be converting that power source into liquid crude. No matter how much the hydro power or steam power cost it could not be used to fly a jet plane where the crude from the well could. If National defense depends on the jet fuel and it most likely will then you will use any means necessary to fill their tanks and that equation will determine when the wells get shut off and capped.


Rationing will occur long before that ever happens. Besides, the economy is toast if you are burning wood to produce oil. We already see the precursor of burning coal and natural gas to produce ethanol at 1.24 to 1. We are going to have lots of oil, just no growth to demand that oil.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Eye of the Storm

Unread postby ralfy » Sat 26 Dec 2015, 19:59:23

One might consider not just global production but production per capita. This puts to question any idea of a "boom."

This might also explain why the tragedy of the commons was also seen in light of population growth.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron