Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pope Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 21:05:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'I') suggest medical books if people want to learn about sex...


And I suggest Catholic medical books. They offer the medical aspects, and put them in an ethical context.

Just reading that there exist STD's isn't enough. You also have to ask: why do so many people have STDs? And how can we best fight this phenomenon. Medical books do not answer this question. Catholic ethics does.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 22:10:04

Part of the problem is that ethics don't cover any of what is modern reality. or any of what goes on in this day and age. If this were the case catholics wouldn't have STD or AIDS. but like it or not some do.

You can argue that means they aren't proper catholics all you want but it still won't change the fact that they and many others do consider them to be catholic.

It won't change the fact that men (who do consider themselves to be pious worshippers) commit adultry with prostitutes then take that disease home to their loving wives, then go back to church and receive absolution. But who cares aobut the women, they are just chattle anyway.

And it still doesn't address the issue of POPES who advocate having children in a situation where they will be exposed to starvation, deprivation and disease. It is not a socially responsible position for the head of any religion who professes to be a moral authority to maintain.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Postby Geology_Guy » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 22:47:54

Child-you will grow up poor and diseased and unloved-trust me I can see the future. You cannot hope for anything better-don't even try to argue the point.

Therefore I sentence you to death. Don't worry it's for your own good and you will feel better after.
Geology_Guy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 22:50:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')herefore I sentence you to death. Don't worry it's for your own good and you will feel better after.


Your life will exemplify the suffering that Jesus bore. You will live in hell so that he may be glorified.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Postby Geology_Guy » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 23:11:00

Wow, Thats a little harsh.

I wish you only the best.

Don't me so quick to judge.

Children are the most defensless among us and might deserve protection before and after they are born. Life is meant to be lived, not spent in hate filled commments.
Geology_Guy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Antimatter » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 05:01:18

I get the feeling lorenzo is playing devil's advocate here.
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby CarnbY » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 06:12:04

lorenzo: you said that if everyone were perfect catholics then there would be no aids and everything would be just wonderful. Well, if everyone were intelligent, moral human beings and relied on their own brains there would be no need for catholicism or other religious mumbo-jumbo either. Your idea of a catholic life is an artificial construct that has no bearing in reality, and by pushing your 'morals' on other people you only promote hate and suffering. There are many sound ideas and principles in the bible, but the catholic church constantly focuses on irrelevant pieces of ritual and rules, and condemns people who disagree with these.
It is in any way useless to argue with you, since from your standpoint every catholic is perfect, and anyone who is not perfect is not a catholic. :roll:
User avatar
CarnbY
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Norway

Postby Teclo » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 07:18:59

I am a heretic with a view to the darker side of life

I think the church is trying to re-assert itself due to some of the failings of the current direction we were going in
But it will be an evil day that we all have to believe one catholic faith again (or one christian faith) - the forces of ignorance would take away our freedom of thought and already they are trying to

These people never liked democracy and because capitalism is failing will try and blame democracy as well, ignoring the many good things it has brought to our world. When the church was in charge it didn't treat people equally, nor did it set the slaves free, nor did it allow freedom of thought, instead we had a dark age

If I was more optimistic I would imagine that we could enter a more spiritual age, of tolerance
But I have watched the evangelist crusadors and the catholic political organisation and they show few signs that they will be very inclusive

Prove me wrong, but I think the new pope will be a hard liner and they will launch some kind of attack on our freedoms

Teclo
User avatar
Teclo
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Antimatter » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 08:39:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'W')hat we now need is a passport indicating whether you are an immune European; so you know when you can enjoy sex without that annoying condom!


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
')1. That's not a very realistic option for normal young people, who want to have sex before marriage, and enjoy it as much as they can.
2. And even if I were married, I would still want to know if I'm "delta32" and if my wife is too (because both parents must be "delta32" to have kids that are immune to HIV).


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'I') want to know if I'm delta32, and if I am, I'm going to have the best sex of my life, and say "fvkk off" to all scare-mongers on this planet. They hide behind every corner.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'I')t was, before HIV came around. In pre-AIDS times, people could talk about a sexual revolution and enjoy it. Unfortunately, my generation hasn't had that luxury and is living in the age of fake terror wars and HIV.


From http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic5816.html

You are playing devil's advocate here no? :wink:
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia
Top

Postby linlithgowoil » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 09:15:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ove and marriage have little to do with each other


What? Are you out of your mind?

I'm afraid that, from your postings, you are very obviously anti-catholic. the Catholic Church has specific teachings that are all based on logic. If you do not agree with them and don't follow them, the Catholic Church teaches that you will not join God in eternal life after death, you will go to Hell - unless you repent.

It's a simple choice really. What is the big debate?

Remember, this life is simply a preparation for the next. This is not IT. That is the mistake many people make - they presume that they should try and make their stay on earth as cosy and wonderful as possible because they dont believe in life after death. Therein is the entire problem. If you do not believe in life after death you have absolutely ZERO to contribute to the debate about the Catholic Church, for your viewpoint and goals are totally different.

The viewpoints expressed very often around here are ones of utilitarianism - the end justifies the means. The Catholic Church does not agree with that. If you could cure the world of AIDS by beating one person to death for no reason, i bet many people on here would think that was a worthwhile thing to do - for the 'greater good'. This would be seen as one of the worst sins imaginable by the Catholic Church.

The reality is - people just don't like to be reminded that their lifestyles are totally bankrupt and they have no morals. It grates on their nerves to be reminded that Hell awaits those who do not repent. They prefer the 'head in the sand' approach.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland
Top

Postby lorenzo » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 10:34:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', ' ')Well, if everyone were intelligent, moral human beings and relied on their own brains there would be no need for catholicism or other religious mumbo-jumbo either.


I really doubt that. You can be very intelligent and completely immoral. Adolf Hitler was a very intelligent man.

Moreover, the idea that everyone should think for themselves is rather narrowminded and reductionistic: people are always embedded in a moral community, in a culture, and in history. "Thinking" is basically a practise of borrowing ideas from a community. When a child is born, and learns to speak, it is already being formed by something outside of itself, namely a group of people, forming a culture, and a moral community.

Your individualism is simplistic, and philosophically nonsensical.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', 'Y')our idea of a catholic life is an artificial construct that has no bearing in reality


The same can be said of your ideas. The fact is that over a billion people try to be good Catholics. A small minority of shallow, atheistic and socalled "liberal" people try to push their notion of "reality" through everyone elses throats.

I think my notion of reality is just as real or as phantasmagoric as yours.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', 'a')nd by pushing your 'morals' on other people you only promote hate and suffering.


That's a bit of a vulgar and easy to make accusation, don't you think? We're talking, nothing more. You don't have to try to open your mind, but you can't stop people from trying to show you a different perspective.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', ' ')the catholic church constantly focuses on irrelevant pieces of ritual and rules


These rituals are the core of Jesus's teachings. The incarnation and the formation of a Holy community are central to Christianity.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', 'c')ondemns people who disagree with these.

I think you just condemned me for creating suffering. You're a bit light-hearted with your gratuite condemnations, aren't you?
You condemn people for being Catholic. So please throw the first stone at yourself.

When the Catholic Church says that certain practises are morally flawed, it has the right to do so. If it uses strong language in the process, so be it. After all, what matters is the message. Moreover, the voices in the Catholic Church are diverse, and the styles are many.

Mature people understand what a "condemnation" entails. It's an act of good will.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', 'e')very catholic is perfect, and anyone who is not perfect is not a catholic.

Almost. Someone who lives by Catholic teachings, is in my eyes a moral person. Potentially, everyone can be a good Catholic, but not every Catohlic is a good Catholic, and there can be good non-Catholics.

Don't be so totalitarian in your thoughts (or in what you think Catholics think).
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby khebab » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 11:49:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'W')hat we now need is a passport indicating whether you are an immune European; so you know when you can enjoy sex without that annoying condom!


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '
')1. That's not a very realistic option for normal young people, who want to have sex before marriage, and enjoy it as much as they can.
2. And even if I were married, I would still want to know if I'm "delta32" and if my wife is too (because both parents must be "delta32" to have kids that are immune to HIV).


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'I') want to know if I'm delta32, and if I am, I'm going to have the best sex of my life, and say "fvkk off" to all scare-mongers on this planet. They hide behind every corner.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'I')t was, before HIV came around. In pre-AIDS times, people could talk about a sexual revolution and enjoy it. Unfortunately, my generation hasn't had that luxury and is living in the age of fake terror wars and HIV.


From http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic5816.html

You are playing devil's advocate here no? :wink:

I think Lorenzo should be Pope :lol: .
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Postby lorenzo » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 13:55:29

What can I say?

The practise of changing identities in order to stimulate a debate is a well established Catholic strategy.


When the Holy Father was negotiating with dictator Jaruzelski about meeting Lech Walesa, He also used all kinds of tricks.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Free » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 15:59:26

My guess is that the new pope will have two important aspects:

1. He will be of the conservative wing of the church.

2. He will come from a third world country.

The first one will be eclipsed by the second one: They will say, look, are'nt we progressive? The new pope is from a third world country! While at the same time pushing very hard for the conservative agenda.

Has anybody heard of a cardinal with the name Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne? (You couldn't think of a better name, could you? It's like from a horror novel...)
Maybe he will be the next pope. I say so because he is from Opus Dei, a sect within the church which have grabbed very much power under the last pope. They are the Jesuites of the 21st century, the soldiers of god.

And for the love of conspiracy theories: He became priest in 1977. Bishop in 1988. Archbishop of Lima in 1999. (666!) He is the antichrist! 8O

(How do you like my new tin foil hat?) :-D
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Postby The_Virginian » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 16:06:46

My vote is for Gary Colman.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Postby threadbear » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 16:06:59

Lorenzo! Beauty!!! :lol: :lol:

I tied my brain in a knot trying to figure out how to respond, to your Catholic persona. I was going to express sympathy and empathy for some of your anti-modern ideas, and then I was going to try to point you in the Sufi direction, if you needed an emotionally charged, satisfying but archaic experience. Man, you had me worried.

There's nothing remotely loving about the institutional hierarchic players within the Catholic church. They are one of the strongest focal points of evil, in the world. They leave a trail of moral slime wherever they've been, preaching passivity to indigineous people, as their lands are stolen, their women raped and their children killed by colonizing forces. They are NEVER on the compassionate side of the divide. They have supported fascism, hidden pedophilia, withheld criticism of the Nazis during the holocaust, and then helped shelter SS from prosecution by being active participants in the intelligence agencies, Project Paperclip, in the post war period.

And people have the nerve to turn to this "higher moral authority" because of STD's? The cardinals surrounding the pope are gonnhorhea in human form. The pope, as a figurehead, was chosen because he was anti-Communist and therefore could be counted on to default to a pro-fascist stance that supported the status quo. He, no doubt, has some fabulous characteristics as a human being, but firing all of the priests who were encouraging the peasants to stand up for themselves in Latin America, in the seventies, eighties and early nineties, calls the entirety of his personality and his personal cosmology into question.

Some of the most loving people I know are Catholics, and strong ones, but they all share something in common. Their desire to prostate themselves before a diety, golden retriever style, outweighs their drive for justice, reason and greater compassion. Their kindness, then, is entirely compromised. These are the type of people who allowed their kids to have sleepovers with priests, without any discomfort. Had they not been so emotionall all accepting and unquestioning, much of the abuse wouldn't have happened.

God, gave us scepticism, reason, logic, to counter blind emotionalism. I suggest "good" Catholics use it.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby lorenzo » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 18:46:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Free', '
')The first one will be eclipsed by the second one: They will say, look, are'nt we progressive? The new pope is from a third world country! While at the same time pushing very hard for the conservative agenda.


See? Many non-Christians and non-Catholics don't know much about the world at large. They haven't seen much. Anyone who has ever travelled outside of the decadent, non-sensical, consumerist, utilitarian Western world immediately understands that people are conservative by nature.

Go out, and see for yourselves.

Ask any normal African (non-converted) or Asian or Brazilian couple if free sex is ok, if blind consumerism is ok, if abortion is ok. They will shout at you and tell you that you are obscene, merely for asking such ludicrous questions.

People who stand in the middle of life, and live it fully, are always conservative.

"Conservatism" in itself is a spontaneous natural philosophical concept, used in every day life, by wise people. It means: to conserve the good things, so that the good life can be carried over to the next generation, who will conserve these good principles and hand them over to their children.

So indeed, any African or third world pope will be far more conservative than the most conservative Western pope.

I think it would be a good thing for the Western world to see a spontaneous African pope. He will question Western life-styles fundamentally. And he won't be criticized for being "hypocritical" (in the sense that liberal fools can tell a Western pope that he enjoys all luxuries of modernity while criticizing it).
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby BabyPeanut » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 19:06:01

Missing option:

Baby Peanut as "Pope Sensible the First" - the first Pope to give out free birth control devices.
Last edited by BabyPeanut on Mon 04 Apr 2005, 21:19:30, edited 1 time in total.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Postby Free » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 19:19:22

Yes but it's clear what this special kind of catholic conservatism means - no condoms, no abortions, no women's rights, gays to the KZ.

Yes there will even be africans who tell you that AIDS doesn't come from sexual contacts but from some weird western conspiracy, or evil spirits, and all you need to do is to say your prayers and be a christian. This sort of evil disinformation is enforced by the catholic church and is a CRIME. Some poor peasants in the african hinterland can't help it if they don't understand the workings of a virus, they don't have a chance to know it. But we have the responsibility to act responsible and tell them the truth.

The church has always been a profiteer of poverty, war, desaster, hopelessness. It's a parasite. A priest is a parasite by definition. Since thousands of years he's the one who promised the people the medicine of the diseases he invented. All they had to do is to feed him, adore him, and allow him to have his dirty secrets.

So yes you shouldn't call it conservatism, but destructionism.

And for hypocrisy: It's funny that people who claim to be "pure" and not to have sexual promiscuity turn out to be the most perverted of them all. It doesn't matter if it is priests that turn out to be pedophiles, or muslims or american protestants who turn to either homosexuality (which is not pervert, but they claim it to be), or anal or oral sex because they want to remain "virgin" until marriage. How fu**ed up can you be!

A puritan is somebody who's greatest fear is that somebody, somewhere is just having fun.
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Postby lorenzo » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 19:27:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')passivity to indigineous people


The Catholic Church has been the first and so far only institution to combat the exploitation of indigenous people. Saints like Pedro de Gante fought exploitation in Latin America, already in the 16th century, - that is, long before the New Left of the 1960s. Bartolomé de las Casas fought the conquistadores, and bisshops and popes agreed with his analysis.

Those who exploited indigenous people often named themselves Christians, but they never were. And they have been exposed by Catholics. All of them, in speech, prayer and writing. So who are the real exploiters?

-the false Christians (described and condemned by all Popes and fought by Saints)
-the liberals (who introduced slavery into the USA?, not Catholics)
-the atheists (slaughtered more indigenous people than any other regime)
-the capitalists (the current exploiters, and Father John Paul condemned them, as do countless cardinals and bisshops)


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'T')hey have supported fascism


That is not true.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'h')idden pedophilia


That is not true. The Pope and the Cardinals have all formally condemned the decadent American anti-christians. The victims were compensated, and the culprits sanctioned. They know they will burn in eternal hell.

Since the Catholic Church is the largest organization in the cosmos, it's normal that there are sinners in it; this does not in any way change the message of the Church.

In fact, it shows how close evil can get to good.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'w')ithheld criticism of the Nazis during the holocaust


That is absolutely false. All Catholic Churches in Europe have helped countless Jews escape.

That can't be said of secular America, which refused to accept Jews. That can't be said of European governments, who shied away. That can't be said of the American Jews, who didn't help their fellow people in Europe at all. That can't be said of the Protestants, who weren't interested the slightest bit. That can't be said of the Soviets, who organized their own little pogroms while the Nazi's were at it.

Of all actors in WWII, the Catholic Church has been the most active in helping Jewish people get through the war.

Moreover, Pope Pius XII has mystically expressed his disgust and ordered all Christians to help the Jews. Only Catholics responded positively.

So please stop using the Catholic Church for your a-historic fantasies.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 't')hen helped shelter SS from prosecution by being active participants in the intelligence agencies, Project Paperclip, in the post war period.

That is true. A small group of sinners abused their office and they have been punished for it. This has nothing to do with the Catholic Church as an institution. This action has been formally condemned.

And by the way, there were two countries where nazis were accepted by the thousands: Argentina and the USA. Many Protestants, atheists and Jews in America welcomed them with open arms.


In short, knowing that the Catholic Church is the largest community in the history of mankind and the largest organization on earth, and with the longest continuous history, it has been so exemplary that in fact it's normal for people to be drawn to it.

Not one other community with values can say that. The Sacredness of the Church is what attracts people to it. But since it is an institution populated by mortals, mistakes happen. In the case of the Catholic Church, these are minor, considering its long history and how large it is as an organization.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'T')he pope was chosen because he was anti-Communist and therefore could be counted on to default to a pro-fascist stance that supported the status quo.

You are not well informed. Father John Paul experienced nazism first hand. He has seen evil up close. He has seen the execution of countless Poles. He has seen the horror. Then he saw the utilitarianist and evil communist state doing things over.

And that is what turned this man into an inspired man. He has seen real evil, and that's why he understands life and ultimate goodness.

His "conservatism" on the moral front is based on his experience of nazism and communism.

I think it's a bit weak of you to say that this holy man has conservative ideas without any good reason. His vision is based on real life.

Please read John Paul's autobiography.

Here is a link to Memory and Identity.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'f')iring all of the priests who were encouraging the peasants to stand up for themselves in Latin America, in the seventies, eighties and early nineties, calls the entirety of his personality and his personal cosmology into question.

Does it?
May I ask you who you are to judge about the past in this gratuite way? Father John Paul knew what totalitarianism was about, both left-wing and right wing totalitarianism. His aversion for liberation-theology may have been a historic mistake, but I don't see how it would "call the entirety of his personality and personal cosmology into question".

It's easy to judge things after the fact.

Many liberation theologists were outspoken Marxists, and I think that if you've ever stood face to face with a Marxists barrel of a gun, you might talk differently.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')outweighs their drive for justice, reason and greater compassion.

Personally, I don't know any institution that has contributed more to justice and the wellbeing of millions of people than the Catholic Church. Through millennia.

Please name one.

Catholics cure the sick, teach children, help the weak, and feed the poor.

Not one other group of people does this. If you know one, please let me know.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'G')od, gave us scepticism, reason, logic, to counter blind emotionalism. I suggest "good" Catholics use it.

The teachings of the Catholic Church are entirely rational and logical. I think there's not one more consistent body of moral philosophy and theology than Catholic teachings.

Neither "rationalism", "existentialism", "postmodernism" or whatever kind of new philosophy is so consistent, comprehensive, rational and logical.

That's probably why it is still around after more than 2000 years. Because the Catholic Church is the incarnation of the apparent contradiction between reason and emotion.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron